×

Weight-adaptive isogeometric analysis for solving elastodynamic problems based on space-time discretization approach. (English) Zbl 07863653

Summary: In this paper, a novel adaptive isogeometric analysis (IGA) is introduced and its application in the numerical solution of two-dimensional elastodynamic problems based on the space-time discretization (STD) approach is studied. In the STD approach, the time is considered as an additional dimension and is discretized the same as the spatial domain. The weights of control points play the main role in the proposed method. In the conventional IGA, the same set of weights is used in the modeling of geometric and solution spaces. The idea is to define two groups of weights: geometric and solution weights. Geometric weights are known and can be determined based on the position of control points, but the solution weights are considered to be unknown and can be determined using a proper strategy so that the accuracy of the solution is optimized. This strategy is based on the minimization of an error function. The results obtained from the proposed method are compared with those obtained from the conventional IGA.
{© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
65Mxx Numerical methods for partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems
76Mxx Basic methods in fluid mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] HouboltJC. A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft. J Aeronaut Sci. 1950;17:540‐550.
[2] NewmarkN. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div. 1959;85:67‐94.
[3] WilsonE. A Computer Program for the Dynamic Stress Analysis of Underground Structures. SEL report number 68‐1. Berkeley, CA: Division of Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, University of California; 1968.
[4] HilberHM, HughesTJR, TaylorRL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1977;5:283‐292.
[5] WoodWL, BossakM, ZienkiewiczOC. An alpha modification of Newmark’s method. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1980;15:1562‐1566. · Zbl 0441.73106
[6] ChungJ, HulbertGM. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized‐α method. J Appl Mech. 1993;60:371‐375. · Zbl 0775.73337
[7] WoodWL. A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 2: theory. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1984;20:2303‐2309. · Zbl 0557.65042
[8] TammaKK, ZhouX, ShaD. A theory of development and design of generalized integration operators for computational structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2001;50:1619‐1664. · Zbl 1011.74029
[9] KujawskiJ, GallagherRH. A generalized least‐squares family of algorithms for transient dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1989;18:539‐550.
[10] FungTC. Higher‐order accurate least‐squares methods for first‐order initial value problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1999;45:77‐99. · Zbl 0938.74066
[11] ArgyrisJH, ScharpfDW. Finite element in time and space. Nucl Eng Des. 1969;10:456‐464.
[12] FriedI. Finite element analysis of time‐dependent phenomena. AIAA Journal. 1969;7:1170‐1173. · Zbl 0179.55001
[13] OdenJT. A general theory of finite elements. II. Applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1969;1:247‐259. · Zbl 0263.73048
[14] VarogluE, FinnWDL. Space‐time finite elements incorporating characteristics for the burgers’ equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1980;16:171‐184. · Zbl 0449.76076
[15] NguyenH, ReynenJ. A space‐time least‐square finite element scheme for advection‐diffusion equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1984;42:331‐342. · Zbl 0517.76089
[16] LewisDL, LundJ, BowersKL. The space‐time Sinc‐Galerkin method for parabolic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1987;24:1629‐1644. · Zbl 0643.65068
[17] FrenchDA, PetersonTE. A continuous space‐time finite element method for the wave equation. Math Comput. 1996;65:491‐506. · Zbl 0846.65048
[18] LiH, ZhaoZ, LuoZ. A space‐time continuous finite element method for 2D viscoelastic wave equation. Bound Value Probl. 2016;2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-016-0563-1 · Zbl 1332.74047 · doi:10.1186/s13661-016-0563-1
[19] KaryofylliV, FringsM, ElgetiS, BehrM. Simplex space‐time meshes in two‐phase flow simulation. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2018;86:218‐230.
[20] LesaintP, RaviartPA. On a finite element method for solving the neutron transport equation. In: deBoorC (ed.), ed. Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc; 1974:89‐123. · Zbl 0341.65076
[21] ReedWH, HillTR. Triangular Mesh Methods for the Neutron Transport Equation. Report LA‐UR‐73‐479. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory; 1973.
[22] HughesTJR, HulbertGM. Space‐time finite element methods for elastodynamics: formulations and error estimates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1988;66:339‐363. · Zbl 0616.73063
[23] HulbertGM. Time finite element methods for structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1992;33:307‐331. · Zbl 0760.73064
[24] LiX, YaoD, LewisRW. A discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for dynamic and wave propagation problems in non‐linear solids and saturated porous media. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;57:1775‐1800. · Zbl 1062.74621
[25] LiuY, LiH, HeS. Mixed time discontinuous space‐time finite element method for convection diffusion equations. Appl Math Mech. 2008;29:1579‐1586. · Zbl 1168.65052
[26] GuoP, WuWH, WuZG. A time discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for generalized thermo‐elastic wave analysis, considering non‐Fourier effects. Acta Mechanica. 2014;225:299‐307. · Zbl 1401.74290
[27] PeiC, SussmanM, Yousuff HussainiM. A space‐time discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method for nonlinear hyperbolic problems. Int J Comput Methods. 2019;16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876218500937 · Zbl 1404.65200 · doi:10.1142/S0219876218500937
[28] ZhaoR, YuK, HulbertGM. Time discontinuous finite element method for transient response analysis of linear time‐varying structures. Mechanica. 2018;53:703‐726. · Zbl 1432.65152
[29] WnagL, PerssonPO. A high‐order discontinuous Galerkin method with unstructured space-time meshes for two‐dimensional compressible flows on domains with large deformations. Comput Fluids. 2015;118:53‐68. · Zbl 1390.76366
[30] HughesTJR, CottrellJA, BazilevsY. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2005;194:4135‐4195. · Zbl 1151.74419
[31] KiendlJ, BletzingerKU, LinhardJ, WüchnerR. Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff-Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2009;198:3902‐3914. · Zbl 1231.74422
[32] BensonDJ, BazilevsY, HsuY, HughesTJR. Isogeometric shell analysis: the Reissner-Mindlin shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010;199:276‐289. · Zbl 1227.74107
[33] ShojaeeS, IzadpanahE, ValizadehN, KiendlJ. Free vibration analysis of thin plates by using a NURBS‐based isogeometric approach. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2012;61:23‐34.
[34] JariH, AtriHR, ShojaeeS. Nonlinear thermal analysis of functionally graded material plates using a NURBS based isogeometric approach. Composite Structures. 2015;119:333‐345.
[35] Nguyen‐ThanhN, ZhouK, ZhuangX, et al. Isogeometric analysis of large‐deformation thin shells using RHT‐splines for multiple‐patch coupling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;316:1157‐1178. · Zbl 1439.74455
[36] ShojaeeS, GhelichiM, IzadpanahE. Combination of isogeometric analysis and extended finite element in linear crack analysis. Struct Eng Mech. 2013;48:125‐150.
[37] Nguyen‐ThanhN, ZhouK. Extended isogeometric analysis based on PHT‐splines for crack propagation near inclusions. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2017;112:1777‐1800. · Zbl 07867190
[38] BazilevsY, HughesTJR. NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Computational Mechanics. 2008;43:143‐150. · Zbl 1171.76043
[39] RahgozarR, MahmoudzadehZ, MalekinejadM, RahgozarP. Dynamic analysis of combined system of framed tube and shear walls by Galerkin method using B‐spline functions. Struct Design Tall Spec Build. 2015;24:591‐606.
[40] LangerU, MooreSE, NeumüllerM. Space-time isogeometric analysis of parabolic evolution problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;306:342‐363. · Zbl 1436.76027
[41] TakizawaK, TezduyarTE, TaraharaT. Ram‐air parachute structural and fluid mechanics computations with the space-time Isogeometric analysis (ST‐IGA). Comput Fluids. 2016;141:191‐200. · Zbl 1390.76359
[42] HoferC, LangerU, NeumüllerM, ToulopoulosI. Time‐multipatch discontinuous Galerkin space‐time isogeometric analysis of parabolic evolution problems. Electron Trans Numer Anal. 2018;49:126‐150. · Zbl 1394.35212
[43] CottrellJA, HughesTJR, BazilevsY. Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009. · Zbl 1378.65009
[44] RuanY. Inverse optimal design of cooling conditions for continuous quenching processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2001;51:127‐142. · Zbl 0985.80002
[45] KnopoffDA, FernándezDR, TorresGA, TurnerCV. Adjoint method for a tumor growth PDE‐constrained optimization problem. Comput Math Appl. 2013;66:1104‐1119. · Zbl 07863342
[46] SerbanR, LiS, PetzoldLR. Adaptive algorithms for optimal control of time‐dependent partial differential‐algebraic equation systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2003;57:1457‐1469. · Zbl 1062.49506
[47] ZiemsJC. Adaptive multilevel inexact SQP‐methods for PDE‐constrained optimization with control constraints. SIAM J Optim. 2013;23:1257:1283 · Zbl 1272.49055
[48] HeinkenschlossM, RidzalD. An inexact trust‐region SQP method with applications to PDE‐constrained optimization. In: Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2008:613‐620. · Zbl 1157.65385
[49] AgnantiarisJP, PolyzosD, BeskosDE. Some studies on dual reciprocity BEM for elastodynamic analysis. Computational Mechanics. 1996;17:270‐277. · Zbl 0841.73066
[50] BrebbiaCA, NardiniD. Dynamic analysis in solid mechanics by an alternative boundary elements procedure. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2000;24:513‐518. · Zbl 0978.74076
[51] DominguezJ. Boundary Element in Dynamics. London, UK: Computational Mechanics Publications; 1993. · Zbl 0790.73003
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.