×

A multilevel projection-based model order reduction framework for nonlinear dynamic multiscale problems in structural and solid mechanics. (English) Zbl 07867235

Summary: A reduction/hyper reduction framework is presented for dramatically accelerating the solution of nonlinear dynamic multiscale problems in structural and solid mechanics. At each scale, the dimensionality of the governing equations is reduced using the method of snapshots for proper orthogonal decomposition, and computational efficiency is achieved for the evaluation of the nonlinear reduced-order terms using a carefully designed configuration of the energy conserving sampling and weighting method. Periodic boundary conditions at the microscales are treated as linear multipoint constraints and reduced via projection onto the span of a basis formed from the singular value decomposition of Lagrange multiplier snapshots. Most importantly, information is efficiently transmitted between the scales without incurring high-dimensional operations. In this proposed proper orthogonal decomposition-energy conserving sampling and weighting nonlinear model reduction framework, training is performed in two steps. First, a microscale hyper reduced-order model is constructed in situ, or using a mesh coarsening strategy, in order to achieve significant speedups even in non-parametric settings. Next, a classical offline-online training approach is performed to build a parametric hyper reduced-order macroscale model, which completes the construction of a fully hyper reduced-order parametric multiscale model capable of fast and accurate multiscale simulations. A notable feature of this computational framework is the minimization, at the macroscale level, of the cost of the offline training using the in situ or coarsely trained hyper reduced-order microscale model to accelerate snapshot acquisition. The effectiveness of the proposed hyper reduction framework at accelerating the solution of nonlinear dynamic multiscale problems is demonstrated for two problems in structural and solid mechanics. Speedup factors as high as five orders of magnitude are shown to be achievable.
{Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

65Nxx Numerical methods for partial differential equations, boundary value problems
65Mxx Numerical methods for partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems
74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] CardosoL, FrittonSP, GailaniG, BenallaM, CowinSC. Advances in assessment of bone porosity, permeability and interstitial fluid flow. Journal of Biomechanics2013; 46(2):253-265.
[2] AdamsMF, BayraktarHH, KeavenyTM, PapadopoulosP. Ultrascalable implicit finite element analyses in solid mechanics with over a half a billion degrees of freedom. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2004; 34.
[3] ArbenzP, vanLentheGH, MennelU, MüllerR, SalaM. A scalable multi‐level preconditioner for matrix‐free μ‐finite element analysis of human bone structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 73(7):927-947. · Zbl 1262.74031
[4] FarhatC, AveryP, ChapmanT, CortialJ. Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy‐based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2014; 98(9):625-662. · Zbl 1352.74348
[5] FarhatC, ChapmanT, AveryP. Structure‐preserving, stability, and accuracy properties of the energy‐conserving sampling and weighting method for the hyper reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2015; 102(5):1077-1110. · Zbl 1352.74349
[6] HillR. Continuum micro‐mechanics of elastoplastic polycrystals. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1965; 13(2):89-101. · Zbl 0127.15302
[7] HillR. A self‐consistent mechanics of composite materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1965; 13(4):213-222.
[8] BensoussanA, LionsJ‐L, PapanicolaouG. Asymptotic Analysis for Periodic Structures, vol. 5. North‐Holland Publishing Company Amsterdam, 1978. · Zbl 0404.35001
[9] FishJ, FanR. Mathematical homogenization of nonperiodic heterogeneous media subjected to large deformation transient loading. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 76(7):1044-1064. · Zbl 1195.74142
[10] HillR. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids1963; 11(5):357-372. · Zbl 0114.15804
[11] Van der SluisO, SchreursP, BrekelmansW, MeijerH. Overall behaviour of heterogeneous elastoviscoplastic materials: effect of microstructural modelling. Mechanics of Materials2000; 32(8):449-462.
[12] SmitR, BrekelmansW, MeijerH. Prediction of the mechanical behavior of nonlinear heterogeneous systems by multi‐level finite element modeling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1998; 155(1):181-192. · Zbl 0967.74069
[13] MieheC, SchröderJ, SchotteJ. Computational homogenization analysis in finite plasticity simulation of texture development in polycrystalline materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1999; 171(3):387-418. · Zbl 0982.74068
[14] FeyelF, ChabocheJ‐L. FE^2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2000; 183(3):309-330. · Zbl 0993.74062
[15] KouznetsovaV, BrekelmansW, BaaijensF. An approach to micro-macro modeling of heterogeneous materials. Computational Mechanics2001; 27(1):37-48. · Zbl 1005.74018
[16] YvonnetJ, HeQ‐C. The reduced model multiscale method (R3M) for the non‐linear homogenization of hyperelastic media at finite strains. Journal of Computational Physics2007; 223(1):341-368. · Zbl 1163.74048
[17] MonteiroE, YvonnetJ, HeQi‐C. Computational homogenization for nonlinear conduction in heterogeneous materials using model reduction. Computational Materials Science2008; 42(4):704-712.
[18] NguyenNC. A multiscale reduced‐basis method for parametrized elliptic partial differential equations with multiple scales. Journal of Computational Physics2008; 227(23):9807-9822. · Zbl 1155.65391
[19] AbdulleA, BaiY. Adaptive reduced basis finite element heterogeneous multiscale method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2013; 257:203-220. · Zbl 1286.74088
[20] HernándezJ, OliverJ, HuespeAE, CaicedoM, CanteJ. High‐performance model reduction techniques in computational multiscale homogenization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2014; 276:149-189. · Zbl 1423.74785
[21] RedekerM, HaasdonkB. A POD‐EIM reduced two‐scale model for crystal growth. Advances in Computational Mathematics2015; 41(5):987-1013. · Zbl 1336.82015
[22] BarraultM, MadayY, NguyenNC, PateraAT. An ‘empirical interpolation’ method: application to efficient reduced‐basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique2004; 339(9):667-672. · Zbl 1061.65118
[23] ChaturantabutS, SorensenDC. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2010; 32(5):2737-2764. · Zbl 1217.65169
[24] OhlbergerM, SchindlerF. Error control for the localized reduced basis multiscale method with adaptive on‐line enrichment. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2015; 37(6):A2865-A2895. · Zbl 1329.65255
[25] HesthavenJS, ZhangS, ZhuX. Reduced basis multiscale finite element methods for elliptic problems. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation2015; 13(1):316-337. · Zbl 1317.65238
[26] YvonnetJ, ZahrouniH, Potier‐FerryM. A model reduction method for the post‐buckling analysis of cellular microstructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2007; 197(1):265-280. · Zbl 1169.74663
[27] FishJ, YuanZ. N‐scale Model Reduction Theory. Oxford University Press: USA, 2008.
[28] AbdulleA, BaiY. Reduced basis finite element heterogeneous multiscale method for high‐order discretizations of elliptic homogenization problems. Journal of Computational Physics2012; 231(21):7014-7036. · Zbl 1284.65161
[29] AbdulleA, BaiY, VilmartG. An offline-online homogenization strategy to solve quasilinear two‐scale problems at the cost of one‐scale problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2014; 99(7):469-486. · Zbl 1352.65462
[30] AbdulleA, BaiY, VilmartG. Reduced basis finite element heterogeneous multiscale method for quasilinear elliptic homogenization problems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems‐Series S2014; 8(1):91-118. · Zbl 1304.65245
[31] BalajewiczM, AmsallemD, FarhatC. Projection‐based model reduction for contact problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2015;106:644-663. · Zbl 1352.74196
[32] PinaJ, KouznetsovaV, GeersM. Thermo‐mechanical analyses of heterogeneous materials with a strongly anisotropic phase: the case of cast iron. International Journal of Solids and Structures2015; 63:153-166.
[33] SirovichL. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part i: coherent structures. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics1987; 45(3):561-571. · Zbl 0676.76047
[34] RyckelynckD. A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach. Journal of Computational Physics2005; 202(1):346-366. · Zbl 1288.65178
[35] CarlbergK, FarhatC. A low‐cost, goal‐oriented ‘compact proper orthogonal decomposition’ basis for model reduction of static systems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 86(3):381-402. · Zbl 1235.74352
[36] ZahrMJ, FarhatC. Progressive construction of a parametric reduced‐order model for PDE‐constrained optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2015; 102(5):1111-1135. · Zbl 1352.49029
[37] GreplMA, MadayY, NguyenNC, PateraAT. Efficient reduced‐basis treatment of nonaffine and nonlinear partial differential equations. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis2007; 41(03):575-605. · Zbl 1142.65078
[38] AnSS, KimT, JamesDL. Optimizing cubature for efficient integration of subspace deformations. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)2008; 27(5):165:1-165:10.
[39] NguyenN, PeraireJ. An efficient reduced‐order modeling approach for non‐linear parametrized partial differential equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 76(1):27-55. · Zbl 1162.65407
[40] AstridP, WeilandS, WillcoxK, BackxT. Missing point estimation in models described by proper orthogonal decomposition. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on2008; 53(10):2237-2251. · Zbl 1367.93110
[41] CarlbergK, Bou‐MoslehC, FarhatC. Efficient non‐linear model reduction via a least‐squares Petrov-Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 86(2):155-181. · Zbl 1235.74351
[42] CarlbergK, FarhatC, CortialJ, AmsallemD. The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics2013; 242(C):623-647. · Zbl 1299.76180
[43] RewieńskiM, WhiteJ. Model order reduction for nonlinear dynamical systems based on trajectory piecewise‐linear approximations. Linear Algebra and its Applications2006; 415(2):426-454. · Zbl 1105.93020
[44] ChapmanT, AveryP, CollinsJP, FarhatC. Accelerated mesh sampling for the hyper reduction of nonlinear computational methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2016;109:1623-1654 . · Zbl 07867162
[45] LawsonCL, HansonRJ. Solving least squares problems, 1974;109:1623-1654. · Zbl 0860.65028
[46] RozzaG. Shape design by optimal flow control and reduced basis techniques: applications to bypass configurations in haemodynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, 2005.
[47] LvgrenAE, MadayY, RonquistEM. Reduced basis element method for the steady Stokes problem. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis2006; 40:529-552. · Zbl 1129.76036
[48] RozzaG, HuynhDBP, PateraAT. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering2008; 15(3):229-275. · Zbl 1304.65251
[49] KnapJ, SpearC, LeiterK, BeckerR, PowellD. A computational framework for scalebridging in multiscale simulations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2016;108:1649-1666. · Zbl 07870057
[50] FarhatC, GeuzaineP, BrownG. Application of a three‐field nonlinear fluid‐structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F‐16 fighter. Computers & Fluids2003; 32:3-29. · Zbl 1009.76518
[51] GeuzaineP, BrownG, HarrisC, FarhatC. Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F‐16 configuration for various flight conditions. AIAA Journal2003; 41:363-371.
[52] TaylorG. The use of flat‐ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress. I. Theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences1948; 194(1038):289-299.
[53] Top500: TOP 500 supercomputer sites, 2016. http://www.top500.org. Accessed on October 1, 2016.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.