×

On the role of global conservation property for finite difference schemes. (English) Zbl 07512378

Summary: High-order finite difference schemes are widely used in the field of numerical solutions of partial differential equations. Although the importance of their local conservation property is well recognized, especially for solving hyperbolic conservation laws, the importance of their global conservation property (GCP) is seldom considered. To show that in some cases the GCP is indeed important in improving performance of finite difference schemes, we make a comparative study of two fifth-order schemes with boundary closures satisfying the GCP or not. For some toy models considered in this short note, we show that the scheme satisfying the GCP does perform better than its counterpart without the GCP.

MSC:

65Mxx Numerical methods for partial differential equations, initial value and time-dependent initial-boundary value problems
76Mxx Basic methods in fluid mechanics
35Lxx Hyperbolic equations and hyperbolic systems
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Deng, X.; Zhu, H.; Min, Y.; Liu, H.; Mao, M.; Wang, G.; Zhang, H., Symmetric conservative metric method: a link between high order finite-difference and finite-volume schemes for flow computations around complex geometries, (Eighth International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (2014)), ICCFD8-2014-005
[2] Deng, X.; Min, Y.; Mao, M.; Liu, H.; Tu, G.; Zhang, H., Further studies on geometric conservation law and applications to high-order finite difference schemes with stationary grids, J. Comput. Phys., 239, 90-111 (2013) · Zbl 1284.65101
[3] Abe, Y.; Nonomura, T.; Iizuka, N.; Fujii, K., Geometric interpretations and spatial symmetry property of metrics in the conservative form for high-order finite-difference schemes on moving and deforming grids, J. Comput. Phys., 260, 163-203 (2014) · Zbl 1349.65552
[4] Lax, P.; Wendroff, B., Systems of conservation laws, Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 13, 217-237 (1960) · Zbl 0152.44802
[5] Perot, J. B., Discrete conservation properties of unstructured mesh schemes, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43, 299-318 (2011) · Zbl 1299.76127
[6] Svärd, M.; Nordström, J., Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial-boundary-value problems, J. Comput. Phys., 268, 17-38 (2014) · Zbl 1349.65336
[7] Fernáandez, D. C.D. R.; Hicken, J. E.; Zingg, D. W., Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations, Comput. Fluids, 95, 171-196 (2014) · Zbl 1390.65064
[8] Morinishi, Y.; Lund, T.; Vasilyev, O.; Moin, P., Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow, J. Comput. Phys., 143, 90-124 (1998) · Zbl 0932.76054
[9] Morinishi, Y., Skew-symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low-Mach number flows, J. Comput. Phys., 229, 276-300 (2010) · Zbl 1375.76113
[10] van’t Hof, B.; Veldman, A. E., Mass, momentum and energy conserving (MaMEC) discretizations on general grids for the compressible Euler and shallow water equations, J. Comput. Phys., 231, 4723-4744 (2012) · Zbl 1245.76074
[11] Coppola, G.; Capuano, F.; de Luca, L., Discrete energy-conservation properties in the numerical simulation of the Navier-Stokes equations, Appl. Mech. Rev., 71, Article 010803 pp. (2019)
[12] Pirozzoli, S., Generalized conservative approximations of split convective derivative operators, J. Comput. Phys., 229, 7180-7190 (2010) · Zbl 1426.76485
[13] Coppola, G.; Capuanoa, F.; Pirozzolib, S.; de Lucaa, L., Numerically stable formulations of convective terms for turbulent compressible flows, J. Comput. Phys., 382, 86-104 (2019) · Zbl 1451.76081
[14] Jameson, A., The construction of discretely conservative finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy, J. Sci. Comput., 34, 152-187 (2008) · Zbl 1133.76030
[15] Nek Sharan, P. B.; Livescu, D., Stable and conservative boundary treatment for difference methods, with application to cut-cell discretizations, (AIAA SciTech Forum (2020))
[16] Turner, J. M.; Haeri, S.; Kim, J. W., Improving the boundary efficiency of a compact finite difference scheme through optimising its composite template, Comput. Fluids, 138, 9-25 (2016) · Zbl 1390.76632
[17] Brady, P.; Livescu, D., High-order, stable, and conservative boundary schemes for central and compact finite differences, Comput. Fluids, 183, 84-101 (2019) · Zbl 1411.76097
[18] Brady, P.; Livescu, D., Foundations for high-order, conservative cut-cell methods: stable discretizations on degenerate meshes, J. Comput. Phys., 426, Article 109794 pp. (2020) · Zbl 07510037
[19] Ding, S.; Shu, C.-W.; Zhang, M., On the conservation of finite difference WENO schemes in non-rectangular domains using the inverse Lax-Wendroff boundary treatments, J. Comput. Phys., 415, Article 109516 pp. (2020) · Zbl 1440.65086
[20] Deng, X.; Chen, Y., A novel strategy for deriving high-order stable boundary closures based on global conservation, I: basic formulas, J. Comput. Phys., 372, 80-106 (2018) · Zbl 1415.76484
[21] Carpenter, M. H.; Gottlieb, D.; Abarbanel, S., Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 111, 220-236 (1994) · Zbl 0832.65098
[22] Hermanns, M.; Hernandez, J. A., Stable high-order finite-difference methods based on non-uniform grid point distributions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 56, 233-255 (2008) · Zbl 1131.65074
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.