×

Two-fluid model with interface sharpening. (English) Zbl 1217.76057

Summary: Two-fluid models are applicable for simulations of all types of two-phase flows ranging from separated flows with large characteristic interfacial length scales to highly dispersed flows with very small characteristic interfacial length scales. The main drawback of the two-fluid model, when used for simulations of stratified flows, is the numerical diffusion of the interface. Stratified flows can be easily and more accurately solved with interface tracking methods; however, these methods are limited to the flows, that do not develop into dispersed types of flows. The present paper describes a new approach, where the advantage of the two-fluid model is combined with the conservative level set method for interface tracking. The advection step of the volume fraction transport equation is followed by the interface sharpening, which preserves the thickness of the interface during the simulation. The proposed two-fluid model with interface sharpening was found to be more accurate than the existing two-fluid models. The mixed flow with both: stratified and dispersed flow, is simulated with the coupled model in this paper. In the coupled model, the dispersed two-fluid model and two-fluid model with interface sharpening are used locally, depending on the parameter which recognizes the flow regime.

MSC:

76M25 Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics) (MSC2010)
76E17 Interfacial stability and instability in hydrodynamic stability

Software:

CATHARE; FLUENT
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] The RELAP5 Code Development Team, Relap5/MOD3 Code Manual Models and Correlations 4 (1995)
[2] Bestion, The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code, Nuclear Engineering and Design 124 pp 229– (1990)
[3] Horvat, On incompressible buoyancy flow benchmarking, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals 39 pp 61– (2004)
[4] Hohne T Valle C Prasser H-M Experimental numerical prediction of horizontal stratified flows
[5] Yao, A three-dimensional two-fluid modelling of stratified flow with condensation for pressurized thermal shock investigations, Nuclear Technology 152 pp 129– (2004)
[6] Scheuerer M Galassi MC Coste P D’Auria F Numerical simulation of free surface flows with heat and mass transfer
[7] Prosperetti, Computational Methods for Multiphase Flows (2007)
[8] Končar, CFD simulation of convective flow boiling of refrigerant in a vertical annulus nuclear engineering and design, Nuclear Engineering and Design 238 pp 693– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.035
[9] Leskovar, Simulation of a reactor cavity steam explosion with a general purpose computational fluid dynamics code, Strojniki Vestnik 52 (5) pp 292– (2006)
[10] Hirt, An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds, Journal of Computational Physics 14 pp 227– (1974) · Zbl 0292.76018
[11] Hyman, Numerical methods for tracking interfaces, Physica 12D pp 396– (1984)
[12] Hirt, Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries, Journal of Computational Physics 39 pp 201– (1981) · Zbl 0462.76020
[13] Černe, Coupling of the interface tracking and the two-fluid models for the simulation of incompressible two-phase flow, Journal of Computational Physics 171 pp 776– (2001)
[14] Osher, Front propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations, Journal of Computational Physics 79 pp 12– (1988) · Zbl 0659.65132
[15] Sussman, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow, Journal of Computational Physics 114 pp 146– (1994) · Zbl 0808.76077
[16] Mehmandoust, An Eulerian particle level set method for compressible deforming solids with arbitrary EOS, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 79 (10) pp 1175– (2009) · Zbl 1176.74202
[17] Andreykiv, Numerical modelling of electromechanical coupling using fictitious domain and level set methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 80 (4) pp 478– (2009) · Zbl 1176.78027
[18] Harlow, Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface, Physics of Fluids 8 pp 2182– (1965) · Zbl 1180.76043
[19] Tryggvason, A front-racking method for the computations of multiphase flow, Journal of Computational Physics 169 pp 708– (2001)
[20] FLUENT 6 2 User’s Guide (2005)
[21] Leonard, The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 88 pp 17– (1991) · Zbl 0746.76067
[22] Muzaferija S Peric M Sames P Schellin T A two-fluid Navier-Stokes solver to simulate water entry
[23] Olsson, A conservative level set method for two phase flow, Journal of Computational Physics 210 pp 225– (2005) · Zbl 1154.76368
[24] Minato A Takamori K Ishida N An extended two-fluid model for interface behaviour in gas-liquid two-phase model
[25] Nagayoshi, Simulation of multi-dimensional heterogeneous and intermittent two-phase flow by using an extended two-fluid model, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 40 pp 827– (2003)
[26] 2007
[27] Höhne, Modelling of stratified two phase flows using an interfacial area density model, WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences Volume 63 pp 123– (2009) · doi:10.2495/MPF090111
[28] Vallée, Experimental investigation and CFD simulation of horizontal stratified two-phase flow phenomena, Nuclear Engineering and Design 238 pp 637– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.051
[29] Frank T Numerical simulation of slug flow regime for an air-water two-phase flow in horizontal pipes
[30] Wintterle, Experimental numerical investigation of counter-current stratified flows in horizontal channels, Nuclear Engineering and Design 238 pp 627– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.02.043
[31] Bartosiewicz, A first assessment of the NEPTUNE_CFD code: instabilities in a stratified flow comparison between the VOF method and a two-field approach, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 29 pp 460– (2008)
[32] Coste P Pouverau J Morel C Lavieville J Boucker M Martin A Modeling turbulence and friction around a large interface in a three-dimension two-velocity Eulerian code
[33] Prasser H-M Ezsol G Baranyai G PMK-2 water hammer tests, condensation caused by cold water injection into main steam-line of VVER-440-type PWR-Quick-Look Report (QLR) 2004
[34] Herrmann, A parallel Eulerian interface tracking/Lagrangian point particle multi-scale coupling procedure, Journal of Computational Physics 229 pp 745– (2010) · Zbl 1253.76126
[35] Olsson, A conservative level set method for two phase flow II, Journal of Computational Physics 225 pp 785– (2007) · Zbl 1256.76052
[36] Štrubelj, Simulations of free surface flows with implementation of surface tension and interface sharpening in the two-fluid model, Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow (2009)
[37] Ishii, Thermo-fluid Dynamics of Two-phase Flow (2006) · Zbl 1204.76002 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-29187-1
[38] Ferziger, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics (1996) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-97651-3
[39] LeVeque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems (2002)
[40] Štrubelj L Tiselj I Conservative level set method and surface tension 2006
[41] Štrubelj L Tiselj I Modeling of Rayleigh-Taylor instability with conservative level set method
[42] Černe G Two-fluid simulation with the coupling of volume-of-Fluid model and two-fluid model 2001
[43] Rayleigh, Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density, Scientific Papers 2 pp 200– (1900) · JFM 15.0848.02
[44] Cabot, Influence of subgrid scales on resovable turbulence and mixing in Rayleigh-Taylor flow, Physics of Fluids 16 pp 495– (2004) · Zbl 1186.76086
[45] Andrews, Accurate computation of convective transport in transient two-phase flow, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 21 pp 205– (1995) · Zbl 0840.76045
[46] Canot, Test-case no 4: Rayleigh-Taylor instability for isothermal, incompressible and non-viscous fluids (PA), Multiphase Science and Technology 16 pp 23– (2004)
[47] Lemonnier, Validation of Advanced Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow (2005)
[48] Chandrasekar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability (1961)
[49] Lavieville J Quemerais E Boucker M Maas L NEPTUNE_CFD V1.0 User Guide 2005
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.