×

A conflict analysis approach for illuminating distributional issues in sustainability policy. (English) Zbl 1179.90222

Summary: In the area of environmental and resource management and in policies aiming at sustainable development, conflicting issues and interests are the normal state of affairs. Mathematical approaches cannot of course be a panacea able to resolve all real-world conflicts; but they can help to provide more insight into the nature of these conflicts by providing systematic information. Moreover mathematical models are very useful in helping at finding potential social compromises by making a complex situation more transparent to policy-makers and lay people. This is the main objective of the conflict analysis procedure developed here. Distributional issues are taken into consideration by means of an eclectic approach using concepts from land-use planning, fuzzy cluster analysis and social choice. All the various properties presented by the proposed approach are made explicit thus allowing its evaluation on theoretical and empirical grounds. Possible relationships of complementarity or conflictuality with other existing approaches are also discussed briefly. A real-world illustrative example is presented too.

MSC:

90B90 Case-oriented studies in operations research
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives

Software:

NAIADE
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Allen, T. F.H.; Tainter, J. A.; Hoekstra, T. W., Supply-side Sustainability (2002), Columbia University Press: Columbia University Press New York
[2] Anderberg, M. R., Cluster Analysis for Applications (1973), Academic Press: Academic Press New York · Zbl 0299.62029
[3] Arrow, K. J., Social Choice and Individual Values (1963), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0984.91513
[4] Arrow, K. J., Invaluable goods, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 2, 757-763 (1997)
[5] Arrow, K. J.; Raynaud, H., Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making (1986), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge · Zbl 0602.90001
[6] Banville, C.; Landry, M.; Martel, J. M.; Boulaire, C., A stakeholder approach to MCDA, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 15-32 (1998)
[7] Baumol, W. J., Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State (1969), Bells and Sons: Bells and Sons London
[8] Bezdek, J. C., Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Functions Algorithms (1980), Plenum: Plenum New York
[9] Black, D., The Theory of Committees and Elections (1958), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 0091.15706
[10] Bojö, J.; Mäler, K. G.; Unemo, L., Environment and Development: An Economic Approach (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
[11] Buchanan, J. M.; Musgrave, R. A., Public Finance and Public Choice (1999), The MIT Press: The MIT Press Cambridge
[12] Duchin, F.; Lange, G. M., The Future of the Environment (1994), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press Oxford
[13] Fishburn, P. C., Binary choice probabilities: On the varieties of stochastic transitivity, Journal of Mathematical psychology, 10, 327-352 (1973) · Zbl 0277.92008
[14] Fishburn, P. C., The Theory of Social Choice (1973), Princeton University Press: Princeton University Press Princeton · Zbl 0253.92006
[15] Funtowicz, S. O.; Ravetz, J. R., The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science, Ecological Economics, 10, 197-207 (1994)
[16] Funtowicz, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., Ravetz, J., 1999. Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. European Environmental Agency, Experts’ Corner, Environmental Issues Series, No. 9.; Funtowicz, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G., Ravetz, J., 1999. Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. European Environmental Agency, Experts’ Corner, Environmental Issues Series, No. 9.
[17] Gamboa Jiménez, G.; Munda, G., The problem of wind-park location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework, Energy Policy, 35, 3, 1564-1583 (2007)
[18] Gravelle, H.; Rees, R., Microeconomics (1992), Longman: Longman London
[19] (Guimarães-Pereira, A.; Guedes, S.; Tognetti, S., Interfaces Between Science and Society (2006), Greenleaf Publishing: Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield)
[20] Hartigan, J., Clustering Algorithms (1975), John Wiley and Sons: John Wiley and Sons New York · Zbl 0372.62040
[21] Helmers, R. L.C. H., Project Planning and Income Distribution (1979), Martinus Nijhoff: Martinus Nijhoff Boston
[22] Hersh, H. M.; Caramazza, A., A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural languages, Journal of experimental psychology: General, 105, 254-276 (1976)
[23] Jasanoff, S., Learning from Disaster: Risk Management after Bhopal (1994), University of Pennsylavania Press: University of Pennsylavania Press Philadelphia
[24] (Kasemir, B.; Gardner, M.; Jäger, J.; Jaeger, C., Public Participation in Sustainability Science (2003), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge)
[25] Kemeny, J., Mathematics without numbers, Daedalus, 88, 571-591 (1959)
[26] Leung, Y., Spatial Analysis and Planning under Imprecision (1988), North Holland: North Holland Amsterdam · Zbl 0663.90019
[27] Lichfield, N., Cost benefit analysis in plan evaluation, Town Planning Review, 35, 2, 160-169 (1964)
[28] Lichfield, N., Economics in Urban Conservation (1988), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[29] Lichfield, N., Problems of valuation discussed, (Banister, D.; Button, K., Transport, the Environment and Sustainable Development (1993), E & FN Spon: E & FN Spon London), 205-211
[30] Martí, N., 2005. La multidimensionalidad de los sistemas locales de alimentación en los Andes peruanos: los chalayplasa del Valle de Lares (Cusco). Ph.D. Dissertation, Doctoral Programme in Environmental Science. Univ. Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.; Martí, N., 2005. La multidimensionalidad de los sistemas locales de alimentación en los Andes peruanos: los chalayplasa del Valle de Lares (Cusco). Ph.D. Dissertation, Doctoral Programme in Environmental Science. Univ. Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
[31] Martinez-Alier, J.; O’Connor, M., Ecological and economic distribution conflicts, (Costanza, R.; Segura, O.; Martinez-Alier, J., Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics (1996), Island Press/ISEE: Island Press/ISEE Washington DC)
[32] Martinez-Alier, J.; Munda, G.; O’Neill, J., Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics, Ecological Economics, 26, 277-286 (1998)
[33] Matarazzo, B.; Munda, G., New approaches for the comparison of L-R fuzzy numbers: A theoretical and operational analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 3, 407-418 (2001) · Zbl 0972.03055
[34] Miyamoto, S., Fuzzy Sets in Information Retrieval and Cluster Analysis (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht · Zbl 0716.68030
[35] Moulin, H., The proportional veto principle, Review of Economic Studies, 48, 407-416 (1981) · Zbl 0484.90006
[36] Moulin, H., From social welfare orderings to acyclic aggregation of preferences, Mathematical Social Sciences, 9, 1-17 (1985) · Zbl 0577.90005
[37] Moulin, H., Axioms of co-operative decision making, Econometric Society Monographs (1988), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 0699.90001
[38] Mueller, D., Voting by veto, Journal of Public Economics, 10, 57-75 (1978)
[39] Munda, G., Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment, Contributions to Economics Series (1995), Physica-Verlag: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg · Zbl 0859.90046
[40] Munda, G., “Social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE)”: Methodological foundations and operational consequences, European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 3, 662-677 (2004) · Zbl 1056.90089
[41] Munda, G., Multi-criteria decision analysis and sustainable development, (Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M., Multiple-criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys (2005), Springer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science: Springer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science New York), 953-986 · Zbl 1072.90542
[42] Munda, G., Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a sustainable economy (2008), Springer: Springer Heidelber and New York
[43] Munda, G., Gamboa, G., Russi, D., Garmendia, E., 2005. Social multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy sources: two real world catalan examples. Report for the European Union Research Project “Development and Application of a Multicriteria Decision Analysis softwareTool for Renewable Energy sources (MCDA-RES)”. Contract NNE5-2001-273.; Munda, G., Gamboa, G., Russi, D., Garmendia, E., 2005. Social multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy sources: two real world catalan examples. Report for the European Union Research Project “Development and Application of a Multicriteria Decision Analysis softwareTool for Renewable Energy sources (MCDA-RES)”. Contract NNE5-2001-273.
[44] Musgrave, A., Unreal assumptions in economic theory: The F-twist untwisted, Kyklos, 34, 377-387 (1981)
[45] Norwich, A. M.; Turksen, I. B., The fundamental measurement of fuzziness, (Yager, R. R., Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory (1982), Pergamon: Pergamon New York) · Zbl 0538.94026
[46] Norwich, A. M.; Turksen, I. B., A model for the measurement of membership and the consequences of its empirical implementation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12, 1-25 (1984) · Zbl 0538.94026
[47] Olson, M., The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities (1982), Yale University press: Yale University press New Haven, Connecticut
[48] Podinovskii, V. V., Criteria importance theory, Mathematical Social Sciences, 27, 237-252 (1994) · Zbl 0898.90012
[49] Rajan, S. R., Disaster, development and governance: Reflections on the ‘lessons’ from Bhopal, Environmental Values, 11, 3, 369-394 (2002)
[50] Saari, D. G., Which is better: The Condorcet or Borda winner?, Social Choice and Welfare, 26, 107-129 (2006)
[51] Sittaro, F., 2006. Participative multicriteria planning in community development. A case study: The Cuyabeno wildlife reserve, Ecuador, Ph.D. dissertation, Venice International University, International Ph.D. programme in “Analysis and Governance for Sustainable Development”.; Sittaro, F., 2006. Participative multicriteria planning in community development. A case study: The Cuyabeno wildlife reserve, Ecuador, Ph.D. dissertation, Venice International University, International Ph.D. programme in “Analysis and Governance for Sustainable Development”.
[52] Stiglitz, J. E., New Perspectives on public finance: Recent achievements and future challenges, Journal of Public Economics, 86, 341-360 (2002)
[53] Truchon, M., Voting games and acyclic collective choice rules, Mathematical Social Sciences, 25, 165-179 (1995) · Zbl 0886.90023
[54] Vargas Isaza, O.L., 2004. La evaluación multicriterio social y su potencial en la gestión forestal de Colombia. Ph.D. Thesis, Doctoral programme in Environmental Sciences. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.; Vargas Isaza, O.L., 2004. La evaluación multicriterio social y su potencial en la gestión forestal de Colombia. Ph.D. Thesis, Doctoral programme in Environmental Sciences. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
[55] Vidu, L., Majority cycles in a multi-dimensional setting, Economic Theory, 20, 373-386 (2002) · Zbl 1035.91021
[56] Wallsten, T. S.; Budescu, D. V.; Rapoport, A.; Zwick, R.; Forsyth, B., Measuring the vague meaning of probability terms, Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 115, 348-365 (1986)
[57] Weber, J., How many voters are needed for paradoxes?, Economic Theory, 20, 341-355 (2002) · Zbl 1030.91015
[58] Williams, B., Morality (1972), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[59] Young, H. P., Condorcet’s theory of voting, American Political Science Review, 82, 4, 1231-1244 (1988)
[60] Young, H. P., Optimal voting rules, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 51-64 (1995)
[61] Young, H. P.; Levenglick, A., A consistent extension of Condorcet’s election principle, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35, 285-300 (1978) · Zbl 0385.90010
[62] Zimmermann, H. J.; Zysno, P., Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10, 243-260 (1983) · Zbl 0519.90049
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.