×

Progressive construction of a parametric reduced-order model for PDE-constrained optimization. (English) Zbl 1352.49029

Summary: An adaptive approach to using reduced-order models (ROMs) as surrogates in partial differential equations (PDE)-constrained optimization is introduced that breaks the traditional offline-online framework of model order reduction. A sequence of optimization problems constrained by a given ROM is defined with the goal of converging to the solution of a given PDE-constrained optimization problem. For each reduced optimization problem, the constraining ROM is trained from sampling the high-dimensional model (HDM) at the solution of some of the previous problems in the sequence. The reduced optimization problems are equipped with a nonlinear trust-region based on a residual error indicator to keep the optimization trajectory in a region of the parameter space where the ROM is accurate. A technique for incorporating sensitivities into a reduced-order basis is also presented, along with a methodology for computing sensitivities of the ROM that minimizes the distance to the corresponding HDM sensitivity, in a suitable norm.{ }The proposed reduced optimization framework is applied to subsonic aerodynamic shape optimization and shown to reduce the number of queries to the HDM by a factor of 4-5, compared with the optimization problem solved using only the HDM, with errors in the optimal solution far less than 0.1%.

MSC:

49M25 Discrete approximations in optimal control
65N30 Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs

Software:

SNOPT; pyOpt

References:

[1] BieglerLT, GhattasO, HeinkenschlossM, vanBloemen WaandersB. Large‐Scale PDE‐Constrained Optimization: An Introduction. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. · Zbl 1094.49500
[2] ItoK, RavindranSS. A reduced‐order method for simulation and control of fluid flows. Journal of computational physics1998; 143(2):403-425. · Zbl 0936.76031
[3] RavindranSS. Reduced‐order adaptive controllers for fluid flows using pod. Journal of Scientific Computing2000; 15(4):457-478. · Zbl 1048.76016
[4] AfanasievK, HinzeM. Adaptive control of a wake flow using proper orthogonal decomposition. In Shape Optimization and Optimal Design, Proc. IFIP Conf., vol. 216CagnolJ (ed.), PolisMP (ed.), ZolesioJ‐P (ed.)(eds)., Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Marcel Dekker, 2001; 317-332. · Zbl 1013.76028
[5] FahlM. Trust‐region methods for flow control based on reduced order modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitätsbibliothek, Trier University, 2001.
[6] BergmannM, CordierL, BrancherJ‐P. Optimal rotary control of the cylinder wake using proper orthogonal decomposition reduced‐order model. Physics of Fluids2005; 17(9)097101-097101. · Zbl 1187.76044
[7] BergmannM, CordierL. Optimal control of the cylinder wake in the laminar regime by trust‐region methods and pod reduced‐order models. Journal of Computational Physics2008; 227(16)7813-7840. · Zbl 1388.76073
[8] KunischK, VolkweinS. Proper orthogonal decomposition for optimality systems. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis2008; 42(01)1-23. · Zbl 1141.65050
[9] GreplMA, NguyenNC, VeroyK, PateraAT, LiuGR. Certified rapid solution of partial differential equations for real‐time parameter estimation and optimization. Proceedings of the 2nd Sandia Workshop of PDE‐Constrained Optimization: Real‐Time PDE‐Constrained Optimization, SIAM Computational Science and Engineering Book Series, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2007; 197-216. · Zbl 1228.65223
[10] AmsallemD, CortialJ, FarhatC. Towards real‐time computational‐fluid‐dynamics‐based aeroelastic computations using a database of reduced‐order information. AIAA Journal2010; 48(9)2029-2037.
[11] HetmaniukU, TezaurR, FarhatC. Review and assessment of interpolatory model order reduction methods for frequency response structural dynamics and acoustics problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2012; 901636-1662. · Zbl 1246.74023
[12] LeGresleyP. A, AlonsoJJ. Airfoil design optimization using reduced order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition. Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, 2000; AIAA Paper 2000-2545.
[13] RozzaG, ManzoniA. Model order reduction by geometrical parametrization for shape optimization in computational fluid dynamics. Proceedings of ECCOMAS CFD, Lisbon, Portugal, 2010.
[14] LassilaT, RozzaG. Parametric free‐form shape design with pde models and reduced basis method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2010; 199(23)1583-1592. · Zbl 1231.76245
[15] ManzoniA, QuarteroniA, RozzaG. Shape optimization for viscous flows by reduced basis methods and free‐form deformation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids2012; 70(5)646-670. · Zbl 1412.76031
[16] Bui‐ThanhT, WillcoxK. Parametric reduced‐order models for probabilistic analysis of unsteady aerodynamic applications. AIAA Journal2008; 46(10)2520-2529.
[17] SirovichL. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. i‐coherent structures. ii‐symmetries and transformations. iii‐dynamics and scaling. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics1987; 45561-571. · Zbl 0676.76047
[18] WashabaughK. Personal Communication, 2013.
[19] RyckelynckD. A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach. Journal of Computational Physics2005; 202(1)346-366. · Zbl 1288.65178
[20] BarraultM, MadayY, NguyenNC, PateraAT. An empirical interpolation method: application to efficient reduced‐basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique2004; 339(9)667-672. · Zbl 1061.65118
[21] ChaturantabutS, SorensenDC. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2010; 32(5)2737-2764. · Zbl 1217.65169
[22] CarlbergK, Bou‐MoslehC, FarhatC. Efficient non‐linear model reduction via a least‐squares petrov-galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 86(2)155-181. · Zbl 1235.74351
[23] CarlbergK, FarhatC, CortialJ, AmsallemD. The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics2013; 242623-647. · Zbl 1299.76180
[24] FarhatC, AveryP, ChapmanT, CortialJ. Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy‐based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2014; 98(9)625-662. · Zbl 1352.74348
[25] EversonR, SirovichL. Karhunen-loeve procedure for gappy data. JOSA A1995; 12(8)1657-1664.
[26] OliveiraIB, PateraAT. Reduced‐basis techniques for rapid reliable optimization of systems described by affinely parametrized coercive elliptic partial differential equations. Optimization and Engineering2007; 8(1)43-65. · Zbl 1171.65404
[27] Bui‐ThanhT, WillcoxK, GhattasO. Model reduction for large‐scale systems with high‐dimensional parametric input space. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing2008; 30(6)3270-3288. · Zbl 1196.37127
[28] UrbanK, VolkweinS, ZeebO. Greedy sampling using nonlinear optimization. In Reduced Order Methods for Modeling and Computational Reduction. Springer International Publishing, 2014: 137-157. · Zbl 1322.65070
[29] HinzeM, MatthesU. Model order reduction for networks of ode and pde systems. In System Modeling and Optimization. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2013; 92-101. · Zbl 1266.93017
[30] HuynhDBP, PateraAT. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for stress intensity factors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2007; 72(10)1219-1259. · Zbl 1194.74413
[31] CarlbergK, FarhatC. A compact proper orthogonal decomposition basis for optimization‐oriented reduced‐order models. The 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Vol. 5964, Victoria, British Columbia Canada, 2008.
[32] RozzaG, HuynhDBP, PateraA. T. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering2008; 15(3)229-275. · Zbl 1304.65251
[33] CarlbergK, FarhatC. A low‐cost, goal‐oriented compact proper orthogonal decompositionbasis for model reduction of static systems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2011; 86(3)381-402. · Zbl 1235.74352
[34] EpureanuBI. A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery. Journal of Fluids and Structures2003; 17(7)971-982.
[35] LieuT, FarhatC, LesoinneM. Reduced‐order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2006; 195(41)5730-5742. · Zbl 1124.76042
[36] LieuT, FarhatC. Adaptation of aeroelastic reduced‐order models and application to an F‐16 configuration. AIAA Journal2007; 45(6)1244-1257.
[37] HayA, BorggaardJT, PelletierD. Local improvements to reduced‐order models using sensitivity analysis of the proper orthogonal decomposition. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2009; 62941-72. · Zbl 1181.76045
[38] AmsallemD, FarhatC. Interpolation method for adapting reduced‐order models and application to aeroelasticity. AIAA Journal2008; 46(7)1803-1813.
[39] AmsallemD, CortialJ, CarlbergK, FarhatC. A method for interpolating on manifolds structural dynamics reduced‐order models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2009; 80(9)1241-1258. · Zbl 1176.74077
[40] DihlmannM, HaasdonkB. Certified pde‐constrained parameter optimization using reduced basis surrogate models for evolution problems. SimTech Preprint, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2013.
[41] YueY, MeerbergenK. Accelerating optimization of parametric linear systems by model order reduction. SIAM Journal on Optimization2013; 23(2)1344-1370. · Zbl 1273.35279
[42] ZahrMJ, AmsallemD, FarhatC. Construction of parametrically‐robust cfd‐based reduced‐order models for pde‐constrained optimization. 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, CA, 2013; AIAA Paper 2013-2845.
[43] NocedalJ, WrightS. Numerical Optimization, Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer: New York, 2006. · Zbl 1104.65059
[44] WashabaughK, AmsallemD, ZahrM, FarhatC. Nonlinear model reduction for cfd problems using local reduced order bases. 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, New Orleans, LA, 2012; AIAA Paper 2012-2686.
[45] GunzburgerMD. Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization. Vol. 5, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2003. · Zbl 1088.93001
[46] HinzeM, PinnauR, UlbrichM, UlbrichS. Optimization with PDE Constraints. Springer: New York, 2009. · Zbl 1167.49001
[47] AkçelikV, BirosG, GhattasO, HillJ, KeyesD, vanBloemen WaandersB. Parallel algorithms for pde‐constrained optimization. Frontiers of Parallel Computing2006; 20291-320. SIAM.
[48] KelleyCT, KeyesDE. Convergence analysis of pseudo‐transient continuation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis1998; 35(2)508-523. · Zbl 0911.65080
[49] KelleyCT, LiaoL‐Z, QiL, ChuMT, ReeseJP, WintonC. Projected pseudo‐transient continuation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis2008; 46(6)3071-3083. · Zbl 1180.65060
[50] ArianE, FahlM, SachsEW. Trust‐region proper orthogonal decomposition for flow control. Report no. 2000‐25, DTIC Document, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE),NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA, 2000.
[51] EftangJL, GreplMA, PateraAT, RønquistEM. Approximation of parametric derivatives by the empirical interpolation method. Foundations of Computational Mathematics2013; 13(5)763-787. · Zbl 1284.65041
[52] GolubGH, Van LoanCF. Matrix Computations. vol. 3, The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore and London, 2012.
[53] BrandM. Fast low‐rank modifications of the thin singular value decomposition. Linear algebra and its applications2006; 415(1)20-30. · Zbl 1088.65037
[54] SamarehJA. A survey of shape parameterization techniques. NASA Conference Publication, Citeseer, Williamsburg, VA, 1999; 333-344.
[55] AndersonGR, AftosmisMJ, NemecM. Parametric deformation of discrete geometry for aerodynamic shape design. AIAA Paper 20122012; 965AIAA Paper 2012-0965.
[56] MauteK, NikbayM, FarhatC. Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three‐dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method. The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2003; 56911-933. · Zbl 1078.74633
[57] MauteK, RaulliM. Fem—optimization module and sdesign user guides, 0.2. 2006.
[58] ImamMH. Three‐dimensional shape optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1982; 18(5)661-673. · Zbl 0482.73071
[59] FarinGE. Curves and surfaces for computer‐aided geometric design: A practical code. Academic Press, Inc.: Orlando, FL, USA, 1996.
[60] GeuzaineP, BrownG, HarrisC, FarhatC. Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F‐16 configuration for various flight conditions. AIAA Journal2003; 41363-371.
[61] RoePL. Approximate riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics1981; 43(2)357-372. · Zbl 0474.65066
[62] GillPE, MurrayW, SaundersMA. Snopt: An sqp algorithm for large‐scale constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization2002; 12(4)979-1006. · Zbl 1027.90111
[63] PerezRE, JansenPW, MartinsJRRA. pyOpt: A Python‐based object‐oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization. Structures and Multidisciplinary Optimization2012; 45(1)101-118. · Zbl 1274.90008
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.