×

Operational research for, with, and by citizens: an overview. (English) Zbl 07874485

Summary: Interest in citizen participation is increasing generally. Almost all operational research (OR) is engaged with clients, but it is mainly in the areas of Soft and Community OR that wider stakeholder and citizen participation has been a significant focus. It is the involvement of citizens that is the subject of this paper. We surveyed OR literature and compiled a corpus of 62 studies, the earliest from 1970, to systematically characterize the involvement of citizens in OR processes. Our review produced three findings: First, some fields of OR have embraced citizen participation, but this is not yet a major concern outside the field of Community OR. Second, citizen participation in OR processes is often driven by a moral rationale. Third, progress in information and communication technology (ICT) enables broad participation, but traditional processes requiring physical presence can also be participatory. From these insights, we formulate research opportunities for OR. (1) OR may join Community OR’s endeavor to engage with and empower citizens who have so far rarely been involved in OR processes. (2) OR may identify benefits and drawbacks of digital OR processes in empirical studies. (3) OR may determine whether involving large numbers of citizens is suitable for the societal scale. (4) OR may research building and maintaining trust. (5) OR may join efforts for data protection of participants. (6) OR may systematically report and reflect on participatory OR processes. (7) OR should continue researching the fair aggregation of individual inputs. Citizen participation in OR is topical and challenging. Pursuing these research opportunities will contribute to OR fulfilling its mandate of better decision-making in close cooperation with all affected stakeholders.

MSC:

90Bxx Operations research and management science

Software:

Web-HIPRE
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Ackoff, RL, A black ghettos research on a university, Operations Research, 18, 761, 1970
[2] Arenilla, M., Concepts in democratic theory, (Rios Insua, D.; French, S., E-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective, 2010, Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation), 15-30, vol 5
[3] Arnstein, SR, A Ladder Of Citizen Participation Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224, 1969
[4] Aubert, AH; Esculier, F.; Lienert, J., Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making, Operations Research Perspectives, 7, Article 100156 pp., 2020
[5] Aubert AH, Lienert J, von Helversen B (2022) Gamified environmental multi-criteria decision analysis: information on objectives and range insensitivity bias International Transactions in Operational Research n/a doi:10.1111/itor.13206. · Zbl 07745344
[6] Handbuch für die Partizipation bei Wasserbauprojekten. Betroffene zu Beteiligten machen, 2019, Umwelt-Wissen. Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern (Switzerland), vol 1915
[7] Bayley, C.; French, S., Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision, Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 195-210, 2008
[8] Benyoucef, M.; Verrons, MH, Configurable e-negotiation systems for large scale and transparent decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 211-224, 2008
[9] Brans, J-P; Climaco, J.; Gallo, G.; Wenstop, F., Special issue on Ethics and O.R. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17, 413-523, 2010
[10] Brauer, T., Capturing the imprecision during an OR intervention: What is, what isn’t and what should be, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 798-808, 2018
[11] Brocklesby, J.; Beall, E., Processes of engagement and methodology design in Community Operational Research - Insights from the indigenous peoples sector, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 996-1005, 2018
[12] Burns, D., Deepening and scaling participatory research with the poorest and most marginalised, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 865-874, 2018
[13] Bwalya, KJ; Mutula, SM, E-government : implementation, adoption and synthesis in developing countries, Global studies in libraries and information, 1, 2014, de Gruyter: de Gruyter Berlin
[14] Cabrera, D.; Cabrera, L.; Powers, E.; Solin, J.; Kushner, J., Applying systems thinking models of organizational design and change in community operational research, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 932-945, 2018
[15] Callon, M.; Lascoumes, P.; Barthe, Y., Hybrid Forums (Chapter 1), (Callon, M.; Lascoumes, P.; Barthe, Y., Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy, 2009, MIT, Cambridge, Mass), 13-36
[16] Carton, F.; Brezillon, P.; Feller, J., Digital selves and decision-making contexts: towards a research agenda, Journal of Decision Systems, 25, 96-105, 2016
[17] Chen, ZJ; Vogel, D.; Wang, ZH, How to satisfy citizens? Using mobile government to reengineer fair government processes, Decision Support Systems, 82, 47-57, 2016
[18] Cockerill, K.; Glynn, P.; Chabay, I.; Farooque, M.; Hämäläinen, RP; Miyamoto, B.; McKay, P., Records of engagement and decision making for environmental and socio-ecological challenges, EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 7, 243-265, 2019
[19] Collins, K.; Ison, R., Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm, (Paper presented at the Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, 2006)
[20] Córdoba, J-R; Midgley, G., Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning, European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 125-142, 2008
[21] Daraio, C.; Diana, M.; Di Costa, F.; Leporelli, C.; Matteucci, G.; Nastasi, A., Efficiency and effectiveness in the urban public transport sector: A critical review with directions for future research, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 248, 1-20, 2016 · Zbl 1346.90094
[22] de Gooyert, V.; Rouwette, E.; van Kranenburg, H.; Freeman, E., Reviewing the role of stakeholders in Operational Research: A stakeholder theory perspective, European Journal of Operational Research, 262, 402-410, 2017 · Zbl 1375.90154
[23] de Witte, K.; Geys, B., Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from local public libraries, European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 592-602, 2013
[24] Duijzer, LE; van Jaarsveld, W.; Dekker, R., Literature review: The vaccine supply chain, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 174-192, 2018 · Zbl 1403.90104
[25] Durbach, IN; Montibeller, G., Behavioural Analytics: Exploring judgments and choices in large data sets, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70, 255-268, 2019
[26] Efremov R, Insua DR (2010) Collaborative Decision Analysis and e-Democracy. In: Rios Insua D, French S (eds) E-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Perspective, vol 5. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation. pp 83-99. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9045-4_6.
[27] Espinosa, A.; Duque, C., Complexity management and multi-scale governance: A case study in an Amazonian indigenous association, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1006-1020, 2018
[28] Espinosa, A.; Walker, J., Complexity management in practice: A Viable System Model intervention in an Irish eco-community, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 225, 118-129, 2013
[29] EURO the Association of European Operational Research Societies (2020) What is Operational Research ? https://www.euro-online.org/web/pages/301/or-and-euro. Accessed retrieved on Nov. 2020.
[30] Ferretti, V.; Gandino, E., Co-designing the solution space for rural regeneration in a new World Heritage site: A Choice Experiments approach, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1077-1091, 2018
[31] Fitzgerald, C.; McCarthy, S.; Carton, F.; Connor, YO; Lynch, L.; Adam, F., Citizen participation in decision-making: Can one make a difference?, Journal of Decision Systems, 25, 248-260, 2016
[32] Foote, J.; Midgley, G.; Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.; Hepi, M.; Earl-Goulet, J., Systemic evaluation of community environmental management programmes, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 288, 207-224, 2021 · Zbl 1487.90471
[33] Franco, LA; Hämäläinen, RP; Rouwette, EAJA; Leppänen, I., Taking stock of behavioural OR: A review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 293, 401-418, 2021 · Zbl 1487.90472
[34] Freeman, RE, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, 2010, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Mass
[35] French, S., Participation and e-participation: Involving stakeholders in the management of food chain risks in the rural economy, 2005, Paper presented at the TED Workshop: e-Participation in Environmental Decision Making, Helsinki and conference ship (Finland)
[36] Gomes, SL; Hermans, LM; Thissen, WAH, Extending community operational research to address institutional aspects of societal problems: Experiences from peri-urban Bangladesh, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 904-917, 2018
[37] Gomez, J.; Insua, DR; Alfaro, C., A participatory budget model under uncertainty, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 249, 351-358, 2016 · Zbl 1346.90424
[38] Goulding, C.; Kelemen, M.; Kiyomiya, T., Community based response to the Japanese tsunami: A bottom-up approach, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 887-903, 2018
[39] Green, AO; Hunton-Clarke, L., A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 292-299, 2003
[40] Gregory, AJ; Atkins, JP, Community Operational Research and Citizen Science: Two icons in need of each other?, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1111-1124, 2018
[41] Gregory, AJ; Atkins, JP; Midgley, G.; Hodgson, AM, Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 283, 321-340, 2020 · Zbl 1431.90089
[42] Gregory, AJ; Jackson, MC, Evaluation Methodologies: A System for Use Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 19-28, 1992
[43] Gregory, R.; Satterfield, T.; Hasell, A., Using decision pathway surveys to inform climate engineering policy choices, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 560, 2016
[44] Grover, AK; Chopra, S.; Krejci, CC, A multi-criteria decision analysis for the public distribution system of food grains in Indian Punjab: Towards decentralized food policies in developing countries, J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal, 16, 2019
[45] Haag, F.; Zurcher, S.; Lienert, J., Enhancing the elicitation of diverse decision objectives for public planning, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 279, 912-928, 2019 · Zbl 1430.90325
[46] Hämäläinen RP (2015) Behavioural issues in environmental modelling - The missing perspective Environmental Modelling & Software 73:244-253 doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.019.
[47] Hämäläinen RP, Mustajoki J, Marttunen M (2010) Web-based decision support: Creating a culture of applying multi-criteria decision analysis and web-supported participation in environmental decision making. In: Rios Insua D, French S (eds) E-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective, vol 5. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation. pp 201-221. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9045-4_12.
[48] Helfgott, A., Operationalising systemic resilience, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 852-864, 2018
[49] Helfgott, A.; Midgley, G.; Chaudhury, A.; Vervoort, J.; Sova, C.; Ryan, A., Multi-level participation in integrative, systemic planning: The case of climate adaptation in Ghana, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 309, 1201-1217, 2023 · Zbl 07709396
[50] Herron, R.; Bendek, ZM, Take Part: Active Learning for Active Citizenship Contributing to Community O.R. Reflections and Practices OR Insight, 20, 3-7, 2007
[51] Herron, R.; Mendiwelso-Bendek, Z., Supporting self-organised community research through informal learning, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 825-835, 2018
[52] Hipel, KW; Obeidi, A.; Fang, L.; Kilgour, DM, Adaptive Systems Thinking in Integrated Water Resources Management with Insights into Conflicts over Water Exports INFOR, Information Systems and Operational Research, 46, 51-69, 2008 · Zbl 07683681
[53] Hjortso, CN, Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR - an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 152, 667-683, 2004 · Zbl 1043.90042
[54] Johnson M (2012) Community-Based Operations Research: Decision Modeling for Local Impact and Diverse Populations. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0806-2_1.
[55] Johnson, MP; Chichirau, GR, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Operations Research and Analytics: A Research Agenda for Scholarship, Practice, and Service, (Druehl, Cheryl; E, Wedad Elmaghraby, Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research, 2020, INFORMS: INFORMS Catonsville, MD), 1-38
[56] Kaplan, EH, Adventures in policy modeling! Operations research in the community and beyond, Omega, 36, 1-9, 2008
[57] Kassen M (2018) Open data and its intermediaries: a cross-country perspective on participatory movement among independent developers Knowledge Management Research & Practice 16:327-342 doi:10.1080/14778238.2018.1471377.
[58] Konsti-Laakso, S.; Rantala, T., Managing community engagement: A process model for urban planning, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1040-1049, 2018
[59] Kunsch, PL; Kavathatzopoulos, I.; Rauschmayer, F., Modelling complex ethical decision problems with operations research, Omega, 37, 1100-1108, 2009
[60] Larousse (2020) Dictionnaire de français en ligne. https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais-monolingue. Accessed retrieved on Oct. 2021.
[61] Lavin JM, Rios Insua D (2010) Participatory Processes and Instruments. In: Rios Insua D, French S (eds) E-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Perspective, vol 5. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation. pp 31-45. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9045-4_3.
[62] Le Menestrel M, Wassenhove L, (editors) (2009) Ethics and Operations Research (Special Issue) Omega 37:1039-1132.
[63] Lee, J.; Rao, HR, Task complexity and different decision criteria for online service acceptance: A comparison of two e-government compliance service domains, Decision Support Systems, 47, 424-435, 2009
[64] Li, MN; Gregor, S., Outcomes of effective explanations: Empowering citizens through online advice, Decision Support Systems, 52, 119-132, 2011
[65] Li, Y.; Zhu, Z., Soft OR in China: A critical report, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 232, 427-434, 2014 · Zbl 1305.90008
[66] Lienert, J.; Duygan, M.; Zheng, J., Preference stability over time with multiple elicitation methods to support wastewater infrastructure decision-making, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 253, 746-760, 2016
[67] Lienert, J.; Schnetzer, F.; Ingold, K., Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134-148, 2013
[68] Lourenco, RP; Costa, JP, Incorporating citizens’ views in local policy decision making processes, Decision Support Systems, 43, 1499-1511, 2007
[69] Marttunen, M.; Lienert, J.; Belton, V., Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 263, 1-17, 2017 · Zbl 1380.91063
[70] Mateos A, Jimenez-Martin A, Rios-Insua S (2015) A Group Decision-Making Methodology with Incomplete Individual Beliefs Applied to e-Democracy Group Decision and Negotiation 24:633-653 doi:10.1007/s10726-014-9401-y.
[71] McKenna, R.; Bertsch, V.; Mainzer, K.; Fichtner, W., Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1092-1110, 2018
[72] Merriam-Webster (2020) Online English dictionary https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/. Accessed retrieved on Oct. 2021.
[73] Midgley, G.; Cavana, RY; Brocklesby, J.; Foote, JL; Wood, DRR; Ahuriri-Driscoll, A., Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 229, 143-154, 2013 · Zbl 1317.90147
[74] Midgley, G.; Johnson, MP; Chichirau, G., What is community operational research?, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 771-783, 2018 · Zbl 1403.90425
[75] Midgley, G.; Ochoa-Arias, AE, Visions of community for community OR Omega, 27, 259-274, 1999
[76] Morgan, TKKB; Fa“aui, TN, Empowering indigenous voices in disaster response: Applying the Mauri Model to New Zealand”s worst environmental maritime disaster, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 984-995, 2018
[77] Munda, G., Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy, 2008, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
[78] Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP (2000) Web-Hipre: Global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis INFOR: Information systems and operational research 38:208-220 doi:10.1080/03155986.2000.11732409. · Zbl 07677618
[79] Mwiti, F.; Goulding, C., Strategies for community improvement to tackle poverty and gender issues: An ethnography of community based organizations (‘Chamas’) and women’s interventions in the Nairobi slums, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 875-886, 2018
[80] O’Brien, F.; Meadows, M., Developing a visioning methodology: Visioning Choices for the future of operational research, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 557-575, 2007 · Zbl 1177.90003
[81] Okada N, Fang LP, Kilgour DM (2013) Community-based Decision Making in Japan Group Decision and Negotiation 22:45-52 doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9320-8.
[82] Ormerod, RJ; Ulrich, W., Operational research and ethics: A literature review, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 228, 291-307, 2013 · Zbl 1317.90005
[83] Ortiz-Fournier, LV; Marquez, E.; Flores, FR; Rivera-Vazquez, JC; Colon, PA, Integrating educational institutions to produce intellectual capital for sustainability in Caguas, Puerto Rico Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8, 203-215, 2010
[84] Osman, IH; Anouze, AL; Irani, Z.; Lee, H.; Medeni, TD; Weerakkody, V., A cognitive analytics management framework for the transformation of electronic government services from users’ perspective to create sustainable shared values, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 278, 514-532, 2019 · Zbl 1430.90413
[85] Ostrom, E., A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems, Science, 325, 419-422, 2009 · Zbl 1226.91043
[86] Page, MJ, The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, Systematic Reviews, 10, 89, 2021
[87] Pala, A.; Zhuang, J., Information sharing in cybersecurity, A Review Decision Analysis, 16, 172-196, 2019
[88] Papadopoulos, Y.; Warin, P., Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective?, European Journal of Political Research, 46, 445-472, 2007
[89] Parry, R.; Mingers, J., Community operational research: Its context and its future, Omega, 19, 577-586, 1991
[90] Pinzon-Salcedo, LA; Torres-Cuello, MA, Community Operational Research: Developing a systemic peace education programme involving urban and rural communities in Colombia, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 946-959, 2018
[91] Pollock, SM; Maltz, MD, Chapter 1 Operations research in the public sector: An introduction and a brief history, Handbooks in operations research and management science, 1-22, 1994, Elsevier, vol 6 · Zbl 0898.90002
[92] Poortinga, W.; Pidgeon, NF, Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation, Risk Analysis, 23, 961-972, 2003
[93] Power, DJ, Big Brother, can watch us Journal of Decision Systems, 25, 578-588, 2016
[94] Reed, MS, Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-2431, 2008
[95] Reed, MS, A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?, Restoration Ecology, 26, S7-S17, 2018
[96] Rios, J.; Insua, DR, A framework for participatory budget elaboration support, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 203-212, 2008 · Zbl 1175.90235
[97] Rosenhead, J., Custom and Practice The Journal of the, Operational Research Society, 37, 335-343, 1986
[98] Rosenhead, J., Introduction: old and new paradigms of analysis, (Rosenhead, J., Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problems structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict, 1989, John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Chichester), 1-20
[99] Rowe, G.; Frewer, LJ, A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30, 251-290, 2005
[100] Siskos, E.; Askounis, D.; Psarras, J., Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation Omega-Int, J Manage Sci, 46, 51-63, 2014
[101] Sommer, KA; Mabin, VJ, Insights into the eldercare conundrum through complementary lenses of Boardman’s SSM and TOC’s Evaporating Cloud, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 248, 286-300, 2016
[102] Stevens, CH, SCIENCE, GOVERNMENT, AND CITIZEN FEEDBACK Operations Research, 18, 577, 1970, -&
[103] Taket, A.; White, L., Doing community operational research with multicultural groups, Omega, 22, 579-588, 1994
[104] Tavella, E.; Papadopoulos, T., Applying OR to problem situations within community organisations: A case in a Danish non-profit, member-driven food cooperative, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 258, 726-742, 2017 · Zbl 1394.90416
[105] Taylor, KC, Teaching decision-making and building resilience in youth - A case study to reduce the supply of vulnerable youth to sex traffickers in Atlanta, Georgia Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 960-970, 2018
[106] Ufua, DE; Papadopoulos, T.; Midgley, G., Systemic Lean Intervention: Enhancing Lean With Community Operational Research, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1134-1148, 2018
[107] Ulrich, W., Critical heuristics of social planning : a new approach to practical philosophy, 1994, Wiley, Chichester, [Paperback ed.] edn
[108] Voinov, A., Modelling with stakeholders - Next generation, Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196-220, 2016
[109] Walczak, D.; Rutkowska, A., Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 260, 706-714, 2017 · Zbl 1403.90664
[110] Wang, Y.; Touboulic, A.; O’Neill, M., An exploration of solutions for improving access to affordable fresh food with disadvantaged Welsh communities, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 1021-1039, 2018
[111] White, L., Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of, PSMs Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 842-855, 2006 · Zbl 1103.90381
[112] White, L.; Bourne, H., Voices and values: Linking values with participation in ORMS in public policy making, Omega-Int J Manage Sci, 35, 588-603, 2007
[113] White L, Taket A (1997) Beyond appraisal: Participatory Appraisal of Needs and the Development of Action (PANDA) Omega 25:523-534 doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00027-3.
[114] Yamori K (2012) Using Games in Community Disaster Prevention Exercises Group Decision and Negotiation 21:571-583 doi:10.1007/s10726-011-9227-9.
[115] Yearworth, M.; White, L., Spontaneous emergence of Community OR: Self-initiating, self-organising problem structuring mediated by social media, Europian Journal of Operational Research, 268, 809-824, 2018
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.