×

Multi-level participation in integrative, systemic planning: the case of climate adaptation in Ghana. (English) Zbl 07709396

Summary: Adaptation to climate change is impacted by a range of interrelated processes operating from local to global levels. There are often significant disconnects between different people’s perceptions of responsibilities, capabilities and motivations, and divergent understandings of how the system works across actors, sectors and levels of governance. This results in misalignments of policies and practices, plus ineffective flows of resources and knowledge across the network of climate adaptation actors. As these disconnects are rooted in deep misunderstandings of the grounded realities of different actors, an experiential process of mutual discovery is required to build shared understanding and mutual respect. While it is common in the literature for people to talk about multi-level governance, most existing planning processes involve the production of separate plans at each individual level, based on the often-mistaken assumption that they will aggregate into an effective multi-level approach. This paper presents a new, multi-level integrated planning and implementation (MIPI) process, bringing together diverse actors from community, district, regional and national levels in the same workshop. The MIPI process creates a safe space that allows participants to interact directly in conducting systemic, cross-level analyses, as well as the multi-level integration of policies, plans and programs. The paper describes how the MIPI process was designed and facilitated in Ghana to address climate change, agricultural development and food security. This methodology has potential for much broader applicability to complex, multi-level planning and implementation processes.

MSC:

90Bxx Operations research and management science

References:

[1] Ackoff, R. L., The future of operational research is past, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 93-104 (1979)
[2] Ackoff, R. L., Resurrecting the future of operational research, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30, 189-199 (1979)
[3] Anderson, R.; Baxter, L. A.; Cissna, K. N., Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (2004), Sage: Sage Thousand Oaks CA
[4] Antwi-Agyei, P.; Fraser, E. D.G.; Dougill, A. J.; Stringer, L. C.; Simelton, E., Mapping the vulnerability of crop production to drought in Ghana using rainfall, yield and socioeconomic data, Applied Geography, 32, 2, 324-334 (2012)
[5] Arce, A., Beyond state intervention: Post-modernism and development, (Frerks, G. E.; den Houden, J. H.B., In search of the middle ground: Essays on the sociology of planned development (1995), Wageningen Agricultural University: Wageningen Agricultural University Wageningen)
[6] Bammer, G., Conditions for co-creation, Integration and Implementation Insights (2018)
[7] Barnaud, C.; d’Aquino, P.; Daré, W. S.; Fourage, C.; Mathevet, R.; Trébuil, G., Power asymmetries in companion modelling processes, (Etienne, M., Companion modelling: A participatory approach supporting sustainable development (2011), QUAE editions: QUAE editions Versailles)
[8] Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M.; van Beek, P.; Hordijk, L.; van Wassenhove, L. N., Interactions between operational research and environmental management, European Journal of Operational Research, 85, 2, 229-243 (1995) · Zbl 0909.90207
[9] Bodin, Ö.; Crona, B. I., The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?, Global Environmental Change, 19, 3, 366-374 (2009)
[10] Bohm, D., On dialogue (1996), Routledge: Routledge London
[11] Boyd, A.; Brown, M.; Midgley, G., Systemic intervention for community OR: Developing services with young people (under 16) living on the streets, (Midgley, G.; Ochoa-Arias, A., Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (2004), Kluwer: Kluwer New York)
[12] Bradbury, H., The Sage handbook of action research (3rd ed.) (2015), Sage: Sage London
[13] Buber, M., I and thou (1958), Scribner: Scribner New York
[14] Buizer, M.; Arts, B.; Kok, K., Governance, scale and the environment: The importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary arenas, Ecology and Society, 16, 1, 21 (2011)
[15] Burns, D., Deepening and scaling participatory research with the most marginalized, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 865-874 (2018)
[16] Callahan, S.; Schenk, M., The ultimate guide to anecdote circles (2006), Anecdote: Anecdote Melbourne
[17] Campbell, H.; Masser, I., GIS and organizations: How effective are GIS in practice? (1995), Taylor & Francis: Taylor & Francis London
[18] Cash, D. W.; Adger, W.; Berkes, F.; Garden, P.; Lebel, L.; Olsson, P.; Pritchard, L.; Young, O., Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world, Ecology and Society, 11, 2, 8 (2006)
[19] Cassidy, L.; Barnes, G. D., Understanding household connectivity and resilience in marginal rural communities through social network analysis in the village of Habu, Botswana, Ecology and Society, 17, 4, 11 (2012)
[20] Chambers, R., Whose reality counts? Putting the first last (1997), Intermediate Technology Publications: Intermediate Technology Publications London
[21] Chambers, R. (2002). Participatory workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. London: Earthscan.
[22] Chaudhury, A. S.; Thornton, T. F.; Helfgott, A.; Sova, C., Applying the robust adaptation planning (RAP) framework to Ghana’s agricultural climate change adaptation regime, Sustainability Science, 12, 5, 657-676 (2017)
[23] Chaudhury, A. S.; Thornton, T. F.; Helfgott, A.; Ventresca, M. J.; Sova, C., Ties that bind: Local networks, communities and adaptive capacity in rural Ghana, Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 214-228 (2017)
[24] Chaudhury, A. S.; Ventresca, M. J.; Thornton, T. F.; Helfgott, A.; Sova, C.; Baral, P.; Rasheed, T.; Ligthart, J., Emerging meta-organisations and adaptation to global climate change: Evidence from implementing adaptation in Nepal, Pakistan and Ghana, Global Environmental Change, 38, 243-257 (2016)
[25] Checkland, P., Systems thinking, systems practice (1981), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[26] Checkland, P., From optimizing to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 757-767 (1985)
[27] Checkland, P.; Poulter, J., Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, Teachers and students (2006), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[28] Checkland, P.; Scholes, J., Soft systems methodology in action (1990), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[29] Churchman, C. W., Operations research as a profession, Management Science, 17, B37-B53 (1970)
[30] Churchman, C. W., The systems approach (1979), Dell: Dell New York
[31] Cooperrider, D. L.; Whitney, D., Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change (2005), Berrett-Koehler: Berrett-Koehler San Francisco CA
[32] Córdoba, J. R.; Midgley, G., Addressing organisational and societal concerns: An application of critical systems thinking to information systems planning in Colombia, (Cano, J., Critical reflections on information systems: A systemic approach (2003), Idea Group: Idea Group Hershey PA)
[33] Córdoba, J. R.; Midgley, G., Broadening the boundaries: An application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1064-1080 (2006) · Zbl 1171.90460
[34] Cronin, K.; Midgley, G.; Skuba Jackson, L., Issues mapping: A problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts, European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 145-158 (2014)
[35] d’Aquino, P.; Bah, A., A bottom-up participatory modelling process for a multi-level agreement on environmental uncertainty management in West Africa, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 2, 271-285 (2013)
[36] De Geus, A., Modeling to predict or to learn?, (Morecroft, J. D.W.; Sterman, J. D., Modeling for learning organizations. (1994), Productivity Press: Productivity Press Portland OR)
[37] Espejo, R.; Harnden, R., The viable system model: Interpretations and applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM (1989), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[38] Ferraro, F.; Etzion, D.; Gehman, J., Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited, Organization Studies, 36, 3, 363-390 (2015)
[39] Fischoff, B., Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process, (Lofstedt, R. E.; Frewer, L., The Earthscan reader in risk and modern society (1998), Earthscan: Earthscan London)
[40] Flood, R. L., Solving problem solving (1995), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[41] Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P.; Norberg, J., Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 1, 441-473 (2005)
[42] Foote, J.; Baker, V.; Gregor, J.; Hepi, M.; Houston, D.; Midgley, G., Systems thinking for community involvement in water conservation, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 645-654 (2007) · Zbl 1177.90266
[43] Foote, J.; Midgley, G.; Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.; Hepi, M.; Earl-Goulet, J., Systemic evaluation of community environmental management programmes, European Journal of Operational Research, 288, 207-224 (2021) · Zbl 1487.90471
[44] Foster, M.; Mathie, A., Situating asset-based community development in the international development context (2001), Coady Institute: Coady Institute Antigonish NS
[45] Franco, L. A., Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: A conceptual development, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 7, 813-821 (2006) · Zbl 1103.90373
[46] Freire, P., Pedagogy of the oppressed (1970), Continuum International Publishing Group: Continuum International Publishing Group London
[47] Funtowicz, S. O.; Ravetz, J. R., Emergent complex systems, Futures, 26, 568-582 (1994)
[48] Gardner, K.; Lewis, D., Anthropology, development and the post-modern challenge (1996), Pluto Press: Pluto Press London
[49] Gelman, A.; Hennig, C., Beyond subjective and objective in statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 180, 4, 967-997 (2017)
[50] Gergen, K. J.; McNamee, S.; Barrett, F. J., Toward transformative dialogue, International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 679-707 (2001)
[51] Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; Trow, M., The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1994), Sage: Sage London
[52] Gibson, C. C.; Ostrom, E.; Ahn, T. K., The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey, Ecological Economics, 32, 217-239 (2000)
[53] Gregory, A. J.; Atkins, J. P.; Midgley, G.; Hodgson, A. M., Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions, European Journal of Operational Research, 283, 321-340 (2020) · Zbl 1431.90089
[54] Gregory, W. J., Critical systems thinking and pluralismA new constellation (1992), City University: City University London, Ph.D. thesis
[55] Gregory, W. J. (1996a). Dealing with diversity. In R. L. Flood & N. R. A. Romm (Eds.), Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York: Plenum.
[56] Gregory, W. J., Discordant pluralism: A new strategy for critical systems thinking?, Systems Practice, 9, 605-625 (1996)
[57] Gregory, W. J.; Romm, N. R.A., Critical facilitation: Learning through intervention in group processes, Management Learning, 32, 4, 453-467 (2001)
[58] Gupta, J., ’Glocal’ politics of scale on environmental issues: Climate change, water and forests, (Padt, F.; Opdam, P.; Polman, N.; Termeer, C., Scale-sensitive governance of the environment (2014), Wiley: Wiley Chichester)
[59] Hagmann, J.; Chuma, E.; Murwira, K.; Connolly, M.; Ficarelli, P., Success factors in integrated natural resource management R&D: Lessons from practice, Conservation Ecology, 5, 2, 29 (2002)
[60] Hajer, M. A.; Wagenaar, H., Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (2003), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[61] Helfgott, A., Situating strength-based approaches to community development in a systems thinking context, Systemist, 30, 2, 398-421 (2008)
[62] Helfgott, A., Operationalising systemic resilience, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 852-864 (2018)
[63] Helfgott, A.; Sova, C.; Thorn, J.; Chaudhury, A.; Bailey, M.; Vervoort, J.; Ademiluyi, A.; Grift, E. V., Multi-level integrated adaptation governance: Ghana workshop report (2014), CGIAR Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security Program: CGIAR Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security Program Copenhagen
[64] Helfgott, A.; Vervoort, J. M.; Bailey, M., Systemic integrated resilience and adaptation (SIRA) diagnostic, prioritization and planning toolkit: A guidebook for researchers and practitioners working with stakeholders (2014), CGIAR Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security Research Program: CGIAR Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security Research Program Copenhagen
[65] Hill, M.; Engle, L. N., Adaptive capacity: Tensions across scales, Environmental Policy and Governance, 23, 3, 177-192 (2013)
[66] Hisschemoller, M.; Richard, S. J.T.; Vellinga, P., The relevance of participatory approaches in integrated environmental assessment, Integrated Assessment, 2, 57-72 (2001)
[67] Hoos, I., Systems analysis in public policy: A critique (1972), University of California Press: University of California Press Berkeley, CA
[68] Irwin, A.; Wynne, B., Misunderstanding science?, The public reconstruction of science and technology (1996), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[69] Jacka, M.; Keller, P., Business process mapping: Improving customer satisfaction (2009), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[70] Jackson, M. C., Systems methodology for the management sciences (1991), Plenum: Plenum New York
[71] Jackson, M. C., Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers (2003), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[72] Jackson, M. C., Critical systems thinking and the management of complexity (2019), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[73] Johnson, G.; Prashantham, S.; Floyd, S. W.; Bourque, N., The ritualization of strategy workshops, Organization Studies, 31, 12, 1589-1618 (2010)
[74] Johnson, M. P., Community-based operations research: Decision modeling for local impact and diverse populations (2012), Springer: Springer New York
[75] Johnson, M. P.; Midgley, G.; Chichirau, G., Emerging trends and new frontiers in community operational research, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 1178-1191 (2018) · Zbl 1403.90002
[76] Kelsey, R., Patient safety: Investigating and reporting serious clinical incidents (2017), CRC Press: CRC Press Boca Raton
[77] Kok, K.; Veldkamp, A., Scale and governance: Conceptual considerations and practical implications, Ecology and Society, 16, 2, 23 (2011)
[78] Kuhn, T., The structure of scientific revolutions (1970), University of Chicago Press: University of Chicago Press Chicago
[79] Laouris, Y.; Michaelides, M., Structured democratic dialogue: An application of a mathematical problem structuring method to facilitate reforms with local authorities in Cyprus, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 918-931 (2018)
[80] Lazarus, R. J., Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future, Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153-1234 (2009)
[81] Lee, D. B., Requiem for large-scale models, AIP Journal, (1973), May, 163-178
[82] Leiss, W., Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 85-94 (1996)
[83] Lilley, R.; Whitehead, M.; Midgley, G., Mindfulness and behavioural insights: Reflections on the meditative brain, systems theory and organizational change, Journal of Awareness-Based System Change, 2, 2, 29-58 (2022)
[84] MacIntosh, R.; MacLean, D.; Seidl, D., Unpacking the effectivity paradox of strategy workshops: Do strategy workshops produce strategic change?, (Golsorkhi, D.; Rouleau, L.; Seidl, D.; Vaara, E., Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (2012), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge)
[85] Maple Croft (2011). Climate change vulnerability index 2011. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi.html [accessed: 10 January 2015].
[86] Matthews, D. (2004). Rethinking systems thinking: Towards a postmodern understanding of the nature of systemic inquiry. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide.
[87] Maturana, H.; Varela, F. J., The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (1992), Shambala: Shambala Boston
[88] McSweeney, C.; New, M.; Lizcano, G., UNDP climate change country profiles: Ghana (2010), United Nations Development Programme: United Nations Development Programme New York
[89] Meppem, T.; Gill, R., Planning for sustainability as a learning concept, Ecological Economics, 26, 2, 121-137 (1998)
[90] Metz, A.; Bartley, L., Cocreating the conditions to sustain the use of research evidence in public child welfare, Child Welfare, 94, 115-139 (2015)
[91] Metz, A.; Boaz, A.; Robert, G., Co-creative approaches to knowledge production: What next for bridging the research to practice gap?, Evidence and Policy, 15, 3, 331-337 (2019)
[92] Midgley, G., Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science, Systems Practice, 5, 147-172 (1992)
[93] Midgley, G. (1996). The ideal of unity and the practice of pluralism in systems science. In, R. L. Flood & N. R. A. Romm (Eds.), Critical systems thinking: Current research and practice. New York: Plenum.
[94] Midgley, G., Dealing with coercion: Critical systems heuristics and beyond, Systems Practice, 10, 37-57 (1997)
[95] Midgley, G., Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice (2000), Kluwer/Plenum: Kluwer/Plenum New York
[96] Midgley, G., Rethinking the unity of science, International Journal of General Systems, 30, 379-409 (2001) · Zbl 1121.00304
[97] Midgley, G., Systemic intervention for public health, American Journal of Public Health, 96, 466-472 (2006)
[98] Midgley, G., Theoretical pluralism in systemic action research, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 1-15 (2011)
[99] Midgley, G., Systemic intervention, (Bradbury, H., The Sage handbook of action research (2015), Sage: Sage London)
[100] Midgley, G., Moving beyond value conflicts: Systemic problem structuring in action (2016), Research Memorandum No. 96. Hull: Business School, University of Hull
[101] Midgley, G., Systemic intervention: Theory, methodology and practice, (Proceedings of the 5^thjubilee international research and practice conference on system analysis in economics, Moscow, Russia, (2018)), November 2018
[102] Midgley, G., The systemic intervention approach, (Cabrera, D.; Cabrera, L.; Midgley, G., Routledge handbook of systems thinking (2023), Routledge: Routledge London)
[103] Midgley, G.; Johnson, M. P.; Chichirau, G., What is community operational research?, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 771-783 (2018) · Zbl 1403.90425
[104] Midgley, G.; Munlo, I.; Brown, M., The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 467-478 (1998) · Zbl 1131.90418
[105] Midgley, G.; Ochoa-Arias, A. E., Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (2004), Kluwer: Kluwer New York
[106] Midgley, G.; Pinzón, L., The implications of boundary critique for conflict prevention, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 1543-1554 (2011)
[107] Midgley, G.; Pinzón, L., Systemic mediation: Moral reasoning and boundaries of concern, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30, 607-632 (2013)
[108] Midgley, G.; Rajagopalan, R., Critical systems thinking, systemic intervention and beyond, (Kijima, K.; Deguchi, H.; Metcalf, G., The Handbook of Systems Sciences (2021), Springer: Springer New York)
[109] Midgley, G.; Reynolds, M., Operational research and environmental management: A new agenda (2001), Operational Research Society: Operational Research Society Birmingham
[110] Midgley, G.; Reynolds, M., Operational research and environmental management: A new agenda, (Ragsdell, G.; West, D.; Wilby, J., Systems thinking and practice in the knowledge age (2002), Kluwer/Plenum: Kluwer/Plenum New York)
[111] Midgley, G.; Reynolds, M., Systems/operational research and sustainable development: Towards a new agenda, Sustainable Development, 12, 56-64 (2004)
[112] Midgley, G.; Reynolds, M., Community operational research and environmental management: A new agenda, (Midgley, G.; Ochoa-Arias, A. E., Community operational research: OR and systems thinking for community development (2004), Kluwer: Kluwer New York)
[113] Mikkelsen, B., Methods for development work and research: A new guide for practitioners (1995), Sage: Sage Copenhagen
[114] Mingers, J. C.; Gill, A., Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (1997), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[115] Mingers, J.; Rosenhead, J., Problem structuring methods in action, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530-554 (2004) · Zbl 1044.90027
[116] Morgan, M. G.; Fischoff, B.; Bostrom, A.; Atman, C. J., Risk communication: A mental models approach (2002), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge
[117] Newman, L.; Dale, A., Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger, Ecology and Society, 10, 1, r2 (2005)
[118] Nicholas, G.; Foote, J.; Kainz, K.; Midgley, G.; Prager, K.; Zurbriggen, C., Towards a heart and soul for co-creative research and practice: A systemic approach, Evidence and Policy, 15, 3, 353-370 (2019)
[119] Ormerod, R., The history and ideas of critical rationalism: The philosophy of Karl Popper and its implications for OR, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 441-460 (2009) · Zbl 1163.90306
[120] Palazzo, A.; Rutting, L.; Zougmoré, R.; Vervoort, J. M.; Havlik, P.; Jalloh, A.; Aubee, E.; Helfgott, A. E.R.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Islam, S.; Valin, H.; Ericksen, P. J.; Segda, Z.; Moussa, A. S.; Bayala, J.; Kadi Kadi, H.; Traoré, P. C.S.; Thornton, P. K., The future of food security, environments and livelihoods in Western Africa: Four socio-economic scenarios (2016), CGIAR Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security: CGIAR Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security CCAFS working paper number 130. Copenhagen
[121] Palazzo, A.; Vervoort, J.; Havlik, P.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Islam, S., Simulating stakeholder-driven food and climate scenarios for policy development in Africa, Asia and Latin America: A multi-regional synthesis (2014), CGIAR Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security: CGIAR Programme on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security CCAFS working paper number 109. Copenhagen
[122] Pinzón Salcedo, L. A., Exploring justice in professional mediationA systemic intervention in Colombia. (2002), Hull: University of Hull, PhD thesis
[123] Ramirez, R.; Selsky, J. W.; van der Heijden, K., Business planning for turbulent times: New methods for applying scenarios (2008), Earthscan: Earthscan London
[124] Revelle, C., Research challenges in environmental management, European Journal of Operational Research, 12, 2, 218-231 (2000) · Zbl 0951.91506
[125] Richards, C.; Blackstock, K.; Carter, C., Practical approaches to participation (2007), Macaulay Institute: Macaulay Institute SERG policy brief no. 1. Aberdeen
[126] Ritchie, C.; Taket, A.; Bryant, J., Community works: 26 Case studies showing community operational research in action (1994), Pavic Press: Pavic Press Sheffield
[127] Roeser, S.; Pesch, U., An emotional deliberation approach to risk, Science, Technology and Human Values, 41, 2, 274-297 (2015)
[128] Rolling, N. G., Towards an interactive agricultural science, European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2, 4, 35-48 (1996)
[129] Rosenhead, J., Rational analysis for a problematic world: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (1989), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[130] Rosenhead, J., Into the swamp: The analysis of social issues, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43, 293-305 (1992)
[131] Rosenhead, J., What’s the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods, Interfaces, 26, 6, 117-131 (1996)
[132] Rosenhead, J.; Mingers, J., Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: Problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict (2001), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[133] Sandström, A. C.; Rova, C. V., The network structure of adaptive governance: A single case study of a fish management area, International Journal of the Commons, 4, 1, 528-551 (2010)
[134] Sartre, J. P., Existentialism is a humanism, English language translation from the original French (2007), Yale University Press: Yale University Press New Haven
[135] Schipper, E. L.F.; Ayers, J.; Reid, H.; Huq, S.; Rahman, A., Community-based adaptation to climate change: Scaling it up (2014), Routledge: Routledge London
[136] Sellamna, N. E., Relativism in agricultural research and development: Is participation a post-modern concept? (1999), Overseas Development Institute: Overseas Development Institute London
[137] Simon, H. A., A behavioral model of rational choice, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 1, 99-118 (1955)
[138] Smajgl, A., Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia, Environmental Modelling and Software, 25, 11, 1470-1476 (2010)
[139] Smith, C. M.; Shaw, D., The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 274, 2, 403-416 (2019)
[140] Sova, C. A.; Thornton, T. F.; Zougmore, R.; Helfgott, A.; Chaudhury, A. S., Power and influence mapping in Ghana’s agricultural adaptation policy regime, Climate and Development, 9, 5, 399-414 (2016)
[141] Stein, C.; Ernstson, H.; Barron, J., A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36, 14-15, 1085-1092 (2011)
[142] Sterman, J. D., Learning in and about complex systems, System Dynamics Review, 10, 291-330 (1994)
[143] Sydelko, P. (2023). Collaborative learning and coordination across agency boundaries to tackle wicked problems. PhD thesis. Hull: University of Hull.
[144] Sydelko, P., Midgley, G., & Espinosa, A. (2017). A systemic integration approach to designing interagency responses to wicked problems. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Conference of the International Society of the Systems Sciences (ISSS), Vienna, Austria, July 2017. https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings61st/article/view/3251.
[145] Sydelko, P.; Midgley, G.; Espinosa, A., Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: Creating a common, cross-agency understanding, European Journal of Operational Research, 294, 250-263 (2021) · Zbl 1487.90475
[146] Tannen, D., The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words (1998), Balentine: Balentine New York
[147] Termeer, C. J.A. M.; Dewulf, A.; van Lieshout, M., Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance, Ecology and Society, 15, 4, 29 (2010)
[148] Ufua, D.; Papadopoulos, T.; Midgley, G., Systemic lean intervention: Enhancing lean with community operational research, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 1134-1148 (2018)
[149] Ulrich, W., Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy (1983), Haupt: Haupt Bern
[150] Ulrich, W., Critical heuristics of social systems design, European Journal of Operational Research, 31, 276-283 (1987)
[151] van Lieshout, M.; Dewulf, A.; Aarts, N.; Termeer, C., Doing scalar politics: Interactive scale framing for managing accountability in complex policy processes, Critical Policy Studies, 6, 2, 163-181 (2012)
[152] Van Notten, P. W.F., An updated scenarios typology, Futures, 35, 5, 423-443 (2003)
[153] Vennix, J., Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics (1996), Wiley: Wiley Chichester
[154] Vervoort, J. M.; Bendor, R.; Kelliher, A.; Strik, O.; Helfgott, A. E.R., Scenarios and the art of worldmaking, Futures, 74, 62-70 (2015)
[155] Vervoort, J. M.; Rutting, L.; Kok, K.; Hermans, F. L.P.; Veldkamp, T.; Bregt, A. K.; van Lammeren, R., exploring dimensions, scales, and cross-scale dynamics from the perspectives of change agents in social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 17, 4, 24 (2012)
[156] Vervoort, J. M.; Thornton, P. K.; Kristjanson, P.; Förch, W.; Ericksen, P. J.; Kok, K.; Ingram, J. S.I.; Herrero, M.; Palazzo, A.; Helfgott, A. E.S.; Wilkinson, A.; Havlík, P.; Mason-D’Croz, D.; Jost, C., Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change, Global Environmental Change, 28, 383-394 (2014)
[157] Vickers, G., The art of judgement (1965), Chapman and Hall: Chapman and Hall London
[158] Vignola, R.; McDaniels, T. L.; Scholz, R. W., Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy-network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas, Environmental Science and Policy, 31, 71-84 (2013)
[159] Voorberg, W. H.; Bekkers, V. J.J. M.; Tummers, L. G., A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17, 9, 1333-1357 (2015)
[160] White, L., A Cook’s tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organizations, European Journal of Operational Research, 268, 3, 784-797 (2018)
[161] White, L.; Taket, A., The death of the expert, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 733-748 (1994)
[162] White, L.; Taket, A., Critiquing multimethodology as metamethodology: Working towards pragmatic pluralism, (Mingers, J.; Gill, A., Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (1997), Wiley: Wiley Chichester)
[163] Wilkinson, A.; Eidinow, E., Evolving practices in environmental scenarios: A new scenario typology, Environmental Research Letters, 3, 4, Article 045017 pp. (2008)
[164] Wynne, B., Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: The weaving of public alienation, Politeia, 17, 51-76 (2000)
[165] Zurek, M. B.; Henrichs, T., Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 8, 1282-1295 (2007)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.