[1] |
Adcock, CJ, Sample size determination: a review, Stat, 46, 261-283 (1997) |
[2] |
Bailer, AJ; Oris, JT, Estimating inhibition concentrations for different response scales using generalized linear models, Environ Toxicol Chem, 16, 1554-1559 (1997) · doi:10.1002/etc.5620160732 |
[3] |
Bailer, AJ; Hughes, MR; Denton, DL; Oris, JT, An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses, Environ Toxicol Chem, 19, 141-150 (2000) · doi:10.1002/etc.5620190117 |
[4] |
Bernardo, JM, Statistical inference as a decision problem: the choice of sample size. An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses, Stat, 46, 151-153 (1997) |
[5] |
Carr, GJ; Bailer, AJ; Rawlings, JM; Belanger, SE, On the impact of sample size on LC50 estimation in acute fish toxicity testing: Is \(N=7\)/Group enough?, Environ Toxicol Chem, 37, 1565-1578 (2018) · doi:10.1002/etc.4098 |
[6] |
Chen, M.; Ibrahim, JG; Shao, Q., Power prior distributions for generalized linear models, J Stat Plan Inference, 84, 121-137 (2000) · Zbl 0971.62036 · doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00140-8 |
[7] |
Cho, EA; Bailer, AJ; Oris, JT, Effect of methyl tert-butyl ether on the bioconcentration and photoinduced toxicity of fluoranthene in fathead minnow larvae (Pimephales promelas), Environ Sci Technol, 37, 7, 1306-1310 (2003) · doi:10.1021/es0207551 |
[8] |
Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press · Zbl 0747.62110 |
[9] |
Dattalo P (2008) Sample-size determination in quantitative social work research. Oxford University Press |
[10] |
De Santis, F., Sample size determination for robust Bayesian analysis, J Am Stat Assoc, 101, 278-291 (2006) · Zbl 1118.62314 · doi:10.1198/016214505000000510 |
[11] |
De Santis, F., Using historical data for Bayesian sample size determination, J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc), 170, 95-113 (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00438.x |
[12] |
Douglas, MT; Chanter, DO; Pell, IB; Burney, GM, A proposal for the reduction of animal numbers required for the acute toxicity to fish test (LC50 determination), Aquat Toxicol, 8, 4, 243-249 (1986) · doi:10.1016/0166-445X(86)90076-7 |
[13] |
Ellis PD (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press |
[14] |
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC · Zbl 1279.62004 |
[15] |
Hobbs, BP; Carlin, BP; Mandrekar, SJ; Sargent, DJ, Hierarchical commensurate and power prior models for adaptive incorporation of historical information in clinical trials, Biometrics, 67, 3, 1047-1056 (2011) · Zbl 1226.62114 · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01564.x |
[16] |
Hobbs, BP; Carlin, BP; Sargent, DJ, Commensurate priors for incorporating historical information in clinical trials using general and generalized linear models, Bayesian Anal, 7, 1-36 (2012) · Zbl 1330.62131 · doi:10.1214/12-BA722 |
[17] |
Hutchinson, TH; Barrett, S.; Buzby, M.; Constable, D.; Hartmann, A.; Hayes, E.; Huggett, D.; Laenge, R.; Lillicrap, AD; Straub, JO; Thompson, RS, A strategy to reduce the numbers of fish used in acute ecotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals, Environ Toxicol Chem, 22, 12, 3031-3036 (2003) · doi:10.1897/02-558 |
[18] |
Ibrahim, JG; Chen, MH, Power prior distributions for regression models, Stat Sci, 15, 46-60 (2000) |
[19] |
Jeram, S.; Sintes, JR; Halder, M.; Fentanes, JB; Sokull-Klüttgen, B.; Hutchinson, TH, A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union, Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 42, 2, 218-224 (2005) · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.04.005 |
[20] |
Joseph, L.; Wolfson, DB; du Berger, R., Sample size calculations for binomial proportions via highest posterior density intervals, Stat, 44, 143-154 (1995) |
[21] |
Joseph, L.; du Berger, R.; Belisle, P., Bayesian and mixed Bayesian/likelihood criteria for sample size determination, Stat Med, 16, 769-781 (1997) · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<769::AID-SIM495>3.0.CO;2-V |
[22] |
Katsiadaki, I.; Ellis, T.; Andersen, L.; Antczak, P.; Blaker, E.; Burden, N.; Fisher, T.; Green, C.; Labram, B.; Pearson, A.; Petersen, K., Dying for change: a roadmap to refine the fish acute toxicity test after 40 years of applying a lethal endpoint, Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 223, 112585 (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112585 |
[23] |
Keddig, N.; Schubert, S.; Wosniok, W., Optimal test design for binary response data: the example of the fish embryo toxicity test, Environ Sci Europe, 27, 15 (2015) · doi:10.1186/s12302-015-0046-5 |
[24] |
Lenth, RV, Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination, Am Stat, 55, 187-193 (2001) · doi:10.1198/000313001317098149 |
[25] |
Lindley, DV, The choice of sample size, Stat, 46, 129-138 (1997) |
[26] |
Lillicrap, A.; Belanger, S.; Burden, N.; Pasquier, DD; Embry, MR; Halder, M.; Lampi, MA; Lee, L.; Norberg-King, T.; Rattner, BA; Schirmer, K.; Thomas, P., Alternative approaches to vertebrate ecotoxicity tests in the 21st century: a review of developments over the last 2 decades and current status, Environ Toxicol Chem, 35, 11, 2637-2646 (2016) · doi:10.1002/etc.3603 |
[27] |
Lipsey MW, Aiken LS (1990) Design sensitivity: statistical power for experimental research, vol 19. Sage Publishing |
[28] |
M’Lan, CE; Joseph, L.; Wolfson, DB, Bayesian sample size determination for binomial proportions, Bayesian Anal, 3, 269-296 (2008) · Zbl 1330.62064 |
[29] |
National Institutes of Health (last updated on November 27, 2018) Enhancing reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/reproducibility/index.htm. Accessed 23 Aug 2021 |
[30] |
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (last updated on July 13, 2021) Draft-approaches to developing occupational exposure limits or bands for engineered nanomaterials: user guide and technical report https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/07/13/2021-14801/draft-approaches-to-developing-occupational-exposure-limits-or-bands-for-engineered-nanomaterials. Accessed 20 Feb 2022 |
[31] |
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) Test No. 203: Fish, Acute Toxicity Test, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2. OECD Publishing, Paris, France |
[32] |
Pham-Gia, T.; Turkkan, N., Sample size determination in Bayesian analysis, Stat, 41, 4, 389-397 (1992) · Zbl 0756.90024 |
[33] |
R Development Core Team 2017 (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria |
[34] |
Rufli, H.; Springer, TA, Can we reduce the number of fish in the OECD acute toxicity test?, Environ Sci Technol, 30, 1006-1111 (2011) |
[35] |
Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen |
[36] |
Stan Development Team (2020) RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2(19):3 |
[37] |
Stephenson, RR, Evaluation of a rapid range-finding test for use in acute lethality studies with fish, Environ Pollut Ser A Ecol Biol, 35, 75-81 (1984) · doi:10.1016/0143-1471(84)90132-6 |
[38] |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 4th edn. EPA-821-R-02-013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC |
[39] |
Walker, SG, How many samples?: A Bayesian nonparametric approach, Stat, 52, 475-482 (2003) |
[40] |
Wang, F.; Gelfand, AE, A simulation-based approach to Bayesian sample size determination for performance under a given model and for separating models, Stat Sci, 17, 193-208 (2002) · Zbl 1013.62025 |
[41] |
Wright, SE; Sigal, B.; Bailer, AJ, Workweek optimization of experimental designs: exact designs for variable sampling costs, J Agric Biol Environ Stat, 15, 491-509 (2010) · Zbl 1306.62364 · doi:10.1007/s13253-010-0037-3 |
[42] |
Zhang, J.; Bailer, AJ; Oris, JT, Bayesian potency estimation in aquatic toxicity testing when a toxicant affects both fecundity and survival of organisms, Environ Toxicol Chem, 31, 8, 1920-1930 (2012) · doi:10.1002/etc.1886 |