×

A practical stress correction method for improving stability of state-based peridynamics based on stress equilibrium equation. (English) Zbl 1537.74013

Summary: State-based peridynamics (SPD) is effective for simulating fracture and damage in different materials. However, the solutions may suffer from numerical instabilities, particularly for strong nonlinearity cases or large displacement cases, leading to inaccurate predictions or oscillation in responses. This paper proposed a novel practical method to solve the instability problem of SPD based on stress equilibrium equation, referred to herein as the stress correction method (SCM). A correction force is applied on each SPD point surrounding the loading points. The correction force is defined as the difference between an internal force obtained by the stress equilibrium equation and that obtained by the force states of the SPD. Four examples are presented herein to verify the accuracy and stability of the proposed method in various conditions, e.g. static and dynamic analyses of elastic and plastic models subjected to force and displacement boundary conditions.

MSC:

74A70 Peridynamics
74A10 Stress
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Silling, S. A., Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces, J. Mech. Phys. Solids48(1) (2000) 175-209. · Zbl 0970.74030
[2] Silling, S. A., Epton, M., Weckner, O., Xu, J. and Askari, E., Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling, J. Elast.88(2) (2007) 151-184. · Zbl 1120.74003
[3] Askari, A., Azdoud, Y., Han, F., Lubineau, G. and Silling, S., Peridynamics for analysis of failure in advanced composite materials, Numerical Modelling of Failure in Advanced Composite Materials (Elsevier, 2015), pp. 331-350.
[4] Hu, Y., Madenci, E. and Phan, N., Peridynamics for predicting damage and its growth in composites, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.40(8) (2017) 1214-1226.
[5] Huang, D., Lu, G. and Liu, Y., Nonlocal peridynamic modeling and simulation on crack propagation in concrete structures, Math. Prob. Eng.2015(2) (2015) 1-11.
[6] Bazazzadeh, S., Zaccariotto, M. and Galvanetto, U., Fatigue degradation strategies to simulate crack propagation using peridynamic based computational methods, Latin Am. J. Solids Struct.16(2) (2019) 1-31.
[7] Madenci, E. and Oterkus, E., Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013). · Zbl 1295.74001
[8] Ren, B., Fan, H., Bergel, G. L., Regueiro, R. A., Lai, X. and Li, S., A peridynamics-SPH coupling approach to simulate soil fragmentation induced by shock waves, Comput. Mech.55(2) (2015) 287-302. · Zbl 1398.74395
[9] Bobaru, F. and Duangpanya, M., The peridynamic formulation for transient heat conduction, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer53(19-20) (2010) 4047-4059. · Zbl 1194.80010
[10] Ru, Y., Yong, H. and Zhou, Y., Fracture analysis of bulk superconductors under electromagnetic force, Eng. Fract. Mech.199 (2018) 257-273.
[11] Lai, X., Ren, B., Fan, H., Li, S., Wu, C., Regueiro, R. A.et al., Peridynamics simulations of geomaterial fragmentation by impulse loads, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech.39(12) (2015) 1304-1330.
[12] Bazazzadeh, S., Morandini, M., Zaccariotto, M. and Galvanetto, U., Simulation of chemo-thermo-mechanical problems in cement-based materials with Peridynamics, Meccanica56(9) (2021) 2357-2379.
[13] Li, P., Hao, Z. and Zhen, W., A stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamic model, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. Technol.339 (2018) 262-280. · Zbl 1440.74028
[14] Hashim, N. A., Coombs, W., Augarde, C. and Hattori, G., An implicit non-ordinary state-based peridynamics with stabilised correspondence material model for finite deformation analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.371 (2020) 113304. · Zbl 1506.74034
[15] Chowdhury, S. R., Roy, P., Roy, D. and Reddy, J., A modified peridynamics correspondence principle: Removal of zero-energy deformation and other implications, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.346 (2019) 530-549. · Zbl 1440.74036
[16] Chen, H. and Spencer, B. W., Peridynamic bond-associated correspondence model: Stability and convergence properties, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.117(6) (2019) 713-727. · Zbl 07865267
[17] Littlewood, D. J., Simulation of dynamic fracture using peridynamics, finite element modeling, and contact, in ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (ASME, British Columbia, 2010), pp. 209-217.
[18] Silling, S. A., Stability of peridynamic correspondence material models and their particle discretizations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.322 (2017) 42-57. · Zbl 1439.74017
[19] Behzadinasab, M. and Foster, J. T., On the stability of the generalized, finite deformation correspondence model of peridynamics, Int. J. Solids Struct.182 (2020) 64-76.
[20] Yaghoobi, A. and Chorzepa, M. G., Higher-order approximation to suppress the zero-energy mode in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics, Comput. Struct.188 (2017) 63-79.
[21] Foster, J. T. and Xu, X., A generalized, ordinary, finite deformation constitutive correspondence model for peridynamics, Int. J. Solids Struct.141-142 (2018) 245-253.
[22] Wu, C. and Ren, B., A stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamics for the nonlocal ductile material failure analysis in metal machining process, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.291 (2015) 197-215. · Zbl 1423.74067
[23] Ganzenmüller, G. C., Hiermaier, S. and May, M., On the similarity of meshless discretizations of peridynamics and smooth-particle hydrodynamics, Comput. Struct.150 (2015) 71-78. · Zbl 1342.74139
[24] Hashim, N. A., Coombs, W. M., Augarde, C. E. and Hattori, G., An implicit non-ordinary state-based peridynamics with stabilised correspondence material model for finite deformation analysis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.371 (2020) 113304. · Zbl 1506.74034
[25] Breitenfeld, M. S., Geubelle, P. H., Weckner, O. and Silling, S. A., Non-ordinary state-based peridynamic analysis of stationary crack problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.272 (2014) 233-250. · Zbl 1296.74099
[26] Gu, X., Madenci, E. and Zhang, Q., Revisit of non-ordinary state-based peridynamics, Eng. Fract. Mech.190 (2018) 31-52.
[27] Madenci, E., Dorduncu, M., Phan, N. and Gu, X., Weak form of bond-associated non-ordinary state-based peridynamics free of zero energy modes with uniform or non-uniform discretization, Eng. Fract. Mech.218 (2019) 106613.
[28] Imachi, M., Tanaka, S. and Bui, T. Q., Mixed-mode dynamic stress intensity factors evaluation using ordinary state-based peridynamics, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.93 (2018) 97-104.
[29] Macek, R. W. and Silling, S. A., Peridynamics via finite element analysis, Finite Elem. Anal. Des.43(15) (2007) 1169-1178.
[30] Bergman, D. and Yang, B., An analytical shape memory polymer composite beam model for space applications, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.16(2) (2015) 1450093. · Zbl 1359.74192
[31] McKenna, F., OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation, Comput. Sci. Eng.13(4) (2011) 58-66.
[32] Gu, Q., Pan, J. and Liu, Y., Consistent tangent stiffness of a three-dimensional wheel-rail interaction element, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn.21(14) (2021) 2140010. · Zbl 1535.74566
[33] Sha, B., Xing, C., Xu, J., Wang, H. and Li, A., A novel orthogonally separated isolation system and its seismic performance on a curved concrete bridge, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn.21(11) (2021) 2150158.
[34] Zhang, J., Chen, K.-J., Zeng, Y.-P., Yang, Z.-Y., Zheng, S.-X. and Jia, H.-Y., Seismic reliability analysis of cable-stayed bridges subjected to spatially varying ground motions,Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn.21(7) (2021) 2150094.
[35] Gu, Q., Qiu, Z. and Huang, S., A modified multi-yield-surface plasticity model: Sequential closest point projection method, Comput. Geotech.69 (2015) 378-395.
[36] Elgamal, A., Yang, Z. H., Parra, E. and Ragheb, A., Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils, Int. J. Plast.19(6) (2003) 883-905. · Zbl 1090.74630
[37] Gu, Q., Conte, J., Yang, Z. and Elgamal, A., Consistent tangent moduli for multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model, Comput. Mech.48(1) (2011) 97-120. · Zbl 1320.74024
[38] Gu, Q., Conte, J. P., Elgamal, A. and Yang, Z., Finite element response sensitivity analysis of multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model by direct differentiation method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.198(30-32) (2009) 2272-2285. · Zbl 1229.74130
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.