×

General formulation of eliminating unusual amplitude growth for structure-dependent integration algorithms. (English) Zbl 1535.70070

Summary: An unusual amplitude growth of the steady-state response for structures with high natural frequencies was found in explicit or semi-explicit structure-dependent integration algorithms with unconditional stability, second-order accuracy and no overshoot. This paper proposes a general formulation for eliminating such an unusual amplitude growth, by incorporating the load-dependent term into the displacement recursive formula without changing the numerical properties of the integration algorithm. Compared with the existing formulation using the local truncation error for eliminating the unusual amplitude growth, the proposed formulation has the advantages of less symbolic operations, while naturally including the existing formulation. In addition, it is observed that the coefficients of the load-dependent term are proportional to the limit values of the displacement coefficients in the displacement recursive formula as the natural frequency of the system tends to infinity. Then, the general formulation of the load-dependent term is tested for 15 structure-dependent integration algorithms to verify its correctness. Finally, numerical examples of linear and nonlinear multiple-degrees-of-freedom systems illustrate that the general formulation can remove effectively and conveniently the unusual amplitude growth for dynamic response analyses.

MSC:

70J35 Forced motions in linear vibration theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Newmark, N. M., A method of computation for structural dynamics, J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE85(3) (1959) 67-94.
[2] Wilson, E. L., Farhoomand, I. and Bathe, K. J., Nonlinear dynamic analysis of complex structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.1(3) (1972) 241-252.
[3] Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R. and Taylor, R. L., Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.5(3) (1977) 283-292.
[4] Wood, W. L., Bossak, M. and Zienkiewicz, O. C., An alpha modification of Newmark’s method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.15(10) (1980) 1562-1566. · Zbl 0441.73106
[5] Chung, J. and Hulbert, G. M., A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-\( \alpha\) method, J. Appl. Mech. ASME60(2) (1993) 371-375. · Zbl 0775.73337
[6] Bathe, K. J. and Baig, M. M. I., On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics, Comput. Struct.83(31-32) (2005) 2513-2524.
[7] Tamma, K. K., Zhou, X. and Sha, D. S., A theory of development and design of generalized integration operators for computational structural dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.50(7) (2001) 1619-1664. · Zbl 1011.74029
[8] Zhou, X. and Tamma, K. K., Design, analysis, and synthesis of generalized single step single solve and optimal algorithms for structural dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.59(5) (2004) 597-668. · Zbl 1068.74616
[9] Yu, K. P., A new family of generalized-\( \alpha\) time integration algorithms without overshoot for structural dynamics, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.37(12) (2008) 1389-1409.
[10] Kuo, S. R., Yau, J. D. and Yang, Y. B., A robust time-integration algorithm for solving nonlinear dynamic problems with large rotations and displacements, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.12(6) (2012) 1250051. · Zbl 1359.70003
[11] Shojaee, S., Rostami, S. and Abbasi, A., An unconditionally stable implicit time integration algorithm: Modified quartic B-spline method, Comput. Struct.153 (2015) 98-111.
[12] Rezaiee-Pajand, M. and Hashemian, M., Time integration method based on discrete transfer function, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.16(5) (2016) 1550009. · Zbl 1359.74440
[13] Rezaiee-Pajand, M., Hashemian, M. and Bohluly, A., A novel time integration formulation for nonlinear dynamic analysis, Aerosp. Sci. Technol.69 (2017) 625-635.
[14] Kim, W., A simple explicit single step time integration algorithm for structural dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.119(5) (2019) 383-403. · Zbl 1425.74474
[15] Noh, G. and Bathe, K. J., An explicit time integration scheme for the analysis of wave propagations, Comput. Struct.129 (2013) 178-193.
[16] Soares, D., A novel family of explicit time marching techniques for structural dynamics and wave propagation models, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.311 (2016) 838-855. · Zbl 1439.65078
[17] Kim, W., An accurate two-stage explicit time integration scheme for structural dynamics and various dynamic problems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.120(1) (2019) 1-28. · Zbl 07859723
[18] Kim, W. and Reddy, J. N., An improved time integration algorithm: A collocation time finite element approach, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.17(2) (2017) 1750024. · Zbl 1535.74643
[19] Noh, G. and Bathe, K. J., The Bathe time integration method with controllable spectral radius: The \(\rho_\infty \)-Bathe method, Comput. Struct.212 (2019) 299-310.
[20] Kim, W. and Choi, S. Y., An improved implicit time integration algorithm: The generalized composite time integration algorithm, Comput. Struct.196 (2018) 341-354.
[21] Chang, S. Y., Explicit pseudodynamic algorithm with unconditional stability, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE128(9) (2002) 935-947.
[22] Kolay, C. and Ricles, J. M., Assessment of explicit and semi-explicit classes of model-based algorithms for direct integration in structural dynamics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.107(1) (2016) 49-73. · Zbl 1352.74182
[23] Chang, S. Y. and Huang, C. L., An improved structure-dependent explicit method for structural dynamics, in Proc. ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Chicago, , July 2008, pp. 91-96.
[24] Chang, S. Y., A new family of explicit methods for linear structural dynamics, Comput. Struct.88(11-12) (2010) 755-772.
[25] Chang, S. Y., Enhanced, unconditionally stable, explicit pseudodynamic algorithm, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE133(5) (2007) 541-554.
[26] Chang, S. Y., A general technique to improve stability property for a structure-dependent integration method, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.101(9) (2015) 653-669. · Zbl 1352.65213
[27] Chang, S. Y., An explicit structure-dependent algorithm for pseudodynamic testing, Eng. Struct.46 (2013) 511-525.
[28] Chang, S. Y., Development and validation of a new family of computationally efficient methods for dynamic analysis, J. Earthq. Eng.19(6) (2015) 847-873.
[29] Chang, S. Y., A family of noniterative integration methods with desired numerical dissipation, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.100(1) (2014) 62-86. · Zbl 1325.65116
[30] Chang, S. Y., Dissipative, noniterative integration algorithms with unconditional stability for mildly nonlinear structural dynamic problems, Nonlinear Dyn.79(2) (2015) 1625-1649.
[31] Chang, S. Y., Tran, N. C., Wu, T. H. and Yang, Y. S., A one-parameter controlled dissipative unconditionally stable explicit algorithm for time history analysis, Sci. Iran.24(5) (2017) 2307-2319.
[32] Kolay, C. and Ricles, J. M., Development of a family of unconditionally stable explicit direct integration algorithms with controllable numerical energy dissipation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.43(9) (2014) 1361-1380.
[33] Chen, C. and Ricles, J. M., Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE134(8) (2008) 676-683.
[34] Gui, Y., Wang, J. T., Jin, F. and Zhou, M. X., Development of a family of explicit algorithms for structural dynamics with unconditional stability, Nonlinear Dyn.77(4) (2014) 1157-1170.
[35] Du, X. Q., Yang, D. X., Zhou, J. L., Yan, X. L., Zhao, Y. L. and Li, S., New explicit integration algorithms with controllable numerical dissipation for structural dynamics, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn.18(3) (2018) 1850044. · Zbl 1535.65092
[36] Li, J. and Yu, K. P., Noniterative integration algorithms with controllable numerical dissipations for structural dynamics, Int. J. Comput. Meth.15(3) (2018) 1850111. · Zbl 1479.74043
[37] Kolay, C. and Ricles, J. M., Response to Maxam and Tamma’s discussion (EQE-18-0306) to Kolay and Ricles’s paper, “Development of a family of unconditionally stable explicit direct integration algorithms with controllable numerical energy dissipation”, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.48 (2019) 482-485.
[38] Chang, S. Y., Elimination of overshoot in forced vibration responses for Chang explicit family methods, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE144(2) (2017) 04017177.
[39] Chang, S. Y., An unusual amplitude growth property and its remedy for structure-dependent integration methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.330 (2018) 498-521. · Zbl 1439.70027
[40] Chang, S. Y., Unusual overshooting in steady-state response for structure-dependent integration methods, J. Earthq. Eng.21(8) (2017) 1220-1233.
[41] Goudreau, G. L. and Taylor, R. L., Evaluation of numerical integration methods in elastodynamics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.2(1) (1973) 69-97. · Zbl 0255.73085
[42] Belytschko, T. and Hughes, T. J. R., Computational Methods for Transient Analysis (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983). · Zbl 0521.00025
[43] Hughes, T. J. R., The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis (Dover Publications Inc, New York, 2000). · Zbl 1191.74002
[44] Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Marullo, T. M. and Mercan, O., Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.38(1) (2009) 23-44.
[45] Zhu, F., Wang, J. T., Jin, F. and Gui, Y., Comparison of explicit integration algorithms for real-time hybrid simulation, Bull. Earthq. Eng.14(1) (2016) 89-114.
[46] Chang, S. Y., An efficient computing explicit method for structural dynamics, J. Press. Vess. T. ASME131(2) (2009) 021211.
[47] Chang, S. Y., Hsu, C. W. and Chen, T. W., Comparison of capability of time integration methods in capturing dynamic loading, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib.9(3) (2010) 409-423.
[48] Yang, D. X. and Yang, K. S., Multi-step prediction of strong earthquake ground motions and seismic responses of SDOF systems based on EMD-ELM method, Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng.85 (2016) 117-129.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.