×

A simple explicit single step time integration algorithm for structural dynamics. (English) Zbl 1425.74474

Summary: In this article, a new single-step explicit time integration method is developed based on the Newmark approximations for the analysis of various dynamic problems. The newly proposed method is second-order accurate and able to control numerical dissipation through the parameters of the Newmark approximations. Explicitness and order of accuracy of the proposed method are not affected in velocity-dependent problems. Illustrative linear and nonlinear examples are used to verify performances of the proposed method.

MSC:

74S05 Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)
65L05 Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations
65L06 Multistep, Runge-Kutta and extrapolation methods for ordinary differential equations
65L12 Finite difference and finite volume methods for ordinary differential equations
34C15 Nonlinear oscillations and coupled oscillators for ordinary differential equations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] SubbarajK, DokainishMA. A survey of direct time‐integration methods in computational structural dynamics—II. Implicit methods. Comput Struct. 1989;32(6):1387‐1401. · Zbl 0702.73073
[2] BatheK‐J, BaigMMI. On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics. Comput Struct. 2005;83(31‐32):2513‐2524.
[3] KimW, ChoiSY. An improved implicit time integration algorithm: the generalized composite time integration algorithm. Comput Struct. 2018;196:341‐354.
[4] KimW, ReddyJN. An improved time integration algorithm: a collocation time finite element approach. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2017;17(2):1750024. · Zbl 1535.74643
[5] ChungJ, LeeJM. A new family of explicit time integration methods for linear and non‐linear structural dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1994;37(23):3961‐3976. · Zbl 0814.73074
[6] TchamwaB, ConwayT, WielgoszC. An accurate explicit direct time integration method for computational structural dynamics. Paper presented at: Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference; 1999; Boston, MA.
[7] NohG, BatheK‐J. An explicit time integration scheme for the analysis of wave propagations. Comput Struct. 2013;129:178‐193.
[8] KimW, LeeJH. An improved explicit time integration method for linear and nonlinear structural dynamics. Comput Struct. 2018;206:42‐53.
[9] DokainishMA, SubbarajK. A survey of direct time‐integration methods in computational structural dynamics—I. Explicit methods. Comput Struct. 1989;32(6):1371‐1386. · Zbl 0702.73072
[10] SoaresJrD. A novel family of explicit time marching techniques for structural dynamics and wave propagation models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2016;311:838‐855. · Zbl 1439.65078
[11] KimW, ReddyJN. A new family of higher‐order time integration algorithms for the analysis of structural dynamics. J Appl Mech. 2017;84(7):071008.
[12] KimW, ReddyJN. Effective higher‐order time integration algorithms for the analysis of linear structural dynamics. J Appl Mech. 2017;84(7):071009.
[13] ZillD, WrightWS, CullenMR. Advanced Engineering Mathematics. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2011.
[14] BatheK‐J. Finite Element Procedures. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2006.
[15] BerendsenHJ, PostmaJPM, vanGunsterenWF, DiNolaA, HaakJR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984;81(8):3684‐3690.
[16] HilberHM, HughesTJR, TaylorRL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1977;5(3):283‐292.
[17] HughesTJR. Analysis of transient algorithms with particular reference to stability behavior. In: Computational Methods for Transient Analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North‐Holland; 1983:67‐155. (A 84‐29160 12‐64). · Zbl 0547.73070
[18] HilberHM. Analysis and Design of Numerical Integration Methods in Structural Dynamics. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley; 1976.
[19] ChungJ, HulbertGM. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized‐α method. J Appl Mech. 1993;60(2):371‐375. · Zbl 0775.73337
[20] ZienkiewiczOC, TaylorRL. The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth‐Heinemann; 2005. · Zbl 1084.74001
[21] IdesmanAV, SchmidtM, SierakowskiRL. A new explicit predictor-multicorrector high‐order accurate method for linear elastodynamics. J Sound Vib. 2008;310(1‐2):217‐229.
[22] FungTC. Construction of higher‐order accurate time‐step integration algorithms by equal‐order polynomial projection. J Vib Control. 2005;11(1):19‐49. · Zbl 1100.65060
[23] HarJ, TammaK. Advances in Computational Dynamics of Particles, Materials and Structures. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. · Zbl 1248.74001
[24] StachowiakT, OkadaT. A numerical analysis of chaos in the double pendulum. Chaos Solit Fractals. 2006;29(2):417‐422. · Zbl 1096.65127
[25] NohG, HamS, BatheKJ. Performance of an implicit time integration scheme in the analysis of wave propagations. Comput Struct. 2013;123:93‐105.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.