The value of the blockchain platform for shipping logistics considering the perceived utility of consumers. (English) Zbl 1521.90082
Summary: Blockchain has been widely used to trace logistics information from sources to destinations in shipping logistics practices. Motivated by market practices, this study intends to discuss the potential application value of blockchain platforms in shipping logistics, considering the perceived utility of consumers. For this purpose, to investigate the shipping logistics supply chain (SLSC) of a shipping company (SC) and a freight forwarding company (FFC), in which FFC decides whether to introduce a blockchain platform and its introduction channel. Specifically, three channel models are considered: Model T (i.e., traditional logistics supply chain channel), Model B (i.e., FFCs applied a blockchain platform via a self-built platform channel), and Model J (i.e., FFCs applied a blockchain platform via joining a third-party platform channel). Meanwhile, the Nash and Stackelberg game are used to characterize the companies’ equilibrium outcomes under different power structures. By comparing these three modes, some interesting results are found: consumer perception of the level of service and privacy protection and consumer sensitivity to price has critical effects on the value of blockchain platforms. Results also show that the blockchain platform does not always motivate the members of the SLSC to become better. Whether the power structure is symmetrical or asymmetrical, FFC adopts Model B instead of Model J, in which the blockchain platform can help FFC increase profits, and the value of blockchain is significant. Moreover, the FFC can obtain at least approximately 78% more benefit when the power structure is symmetrical than asymmetrical. However, the value of blockchain platforms to SC is not necessarily significant. The value of the blockchain platform for SC is significant only in Model B with the power structure asymmetric. Therefore, the value of the blockchain platform in Model B with the power structure asymmetrical for both FFCs and SCs is significant, achieving a win-win situation. Also, an extensive numerical analysis showing the optimal channel strategy in the three models generated additional management insights.
MSC:
| 90B50 | Management decision making, including multiple objectives |
| 90B06 | Transportation, logistics and supply chain management |
| 91A80 | Applications of game theory |
References:
| [1] | M. Baglio, S. Perotti, F. Dallari and A. Creazza, How can logistics real estate support third-party logistics providers? Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. (2021) 1-25. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2021.1908242 · doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1908242 |
| [2] | J. Wang, J. Liu and X. Zhang, Service purchasing and market-entry problems in a shipping supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 136 (2020) 101895. |
| [3] | C.H. Chang and P.L. Lai, An evaluation of logistics policy enablers between Taiwan and the UK. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2 (2017) 2-20. |
| [4] | C.S. Yang, Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 131 (2019) 108-117. |
| [5] | M. Mas-Machuca, F. Marimon, C. Jaca, The unexplored potential of trust to boost customer loyalty for transport platforms. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 41 (2021) 100618. |
| [6] | R.W. Ahmad, H. Hasan, R. Jayaraman, K. Salah, M. Omar, Blockchain applications and architectures for port operations and logistics management. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 41 (2021) 100620. |
| [7] | N. Hackius and M. Petersen, Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or treat? Proc. Hambg. Int. Conf. Logist. 23 (2017) 3-18. |
| [8] | H. Zhong, F. Zhang and Y. Gu, A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freight rate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-based market, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 149 (2021) 102303. |
| [9] | T.M. Choi, Blockchain-technology-supported platforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 128 (2019) 17-29. |
| [10] | N. Saeed, Cooperation among freight forwarders: Mode choice and intermodal freight transport. Res. Transp. Econ. 42 (2013) 77-86. |
| [11] | V. Babich and G. Hilary, Distributed ledgers and operations: what operations management researchers should know about blockchain technology. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 22 (2020) 223-240. |
| [12] | Y. Yu, Y. Luo and Y. Shi, Adoption of blockchain technology in a two-stage supply chain: spillover effect on workforce. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 161 (2022) 102685. |
| [13] | Y. Wang, M. Singgih, J. Wang and M. Rit, Making sense of blockchain technology: How will it transform supply chains? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 211 (2019) 221-236. |
| [14] | Y.T.Huang, B.Z. Zheng and Z.J.Wang, The value of information sharing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain. RAIRO: OR 55 (2005) 2001-2022. · Zbl 1472.90007 |
| [15] | S. Liu, G. Hua, Y. Kang, T.C.E. Cheng and Y. Xu, What value does blockchain bring to the imported fresh food supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 165 (2022) 102859. |
| [16] | T.M. Choi, L. Feng and R. Li, Information disclosure structure in supply chains with rental service platforms in the blockchain technology era. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 221 (2020) 107473. |
| [17] | N. Saxena, B. Sarkar, How does the retailing industry decide the best replenishment strategy by utilizing technological support through blockchain? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 71 (2023) 103151. |
| [18] | Y.J. Cai, T.M. Choi and J. Zhang, Platform supported supply chain operations in the blockchain era: supply contracting and moral hazards. Decis. Sci. (2020) 1-27. DOI: 10.1111/deci.12475. · doi:10.1111/deci.12475 |
| [19] | J.J. Sikorski, J. Haughton and M. Kraft, Blockchain technology in the chemical industry: machine-to-machine electricity market. Appl. Energy 195 (2017) 234-246. |
| [20] | B. Niu, J. Dong and Y. Liu, Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 152 (2021) 102276. |
| [21] | B. Shen, X. Xu and Q. Yuan, Selling secondhand products through an online platform with blockchain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 142 (2020) 102066. |
| [22] | Y. Cao and B. Shen, Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 161 (2022) 102695. |
| [23] | T.M. Choi, S. Guo and S. Luo, When blockchain meets social-media: Will the result benefit social media analytics for supply chain operations management? Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 135 (2020) 101860. |
| [24] | I.J. Orji, S. Kusi-Sarpong, S. Huang and D. Vazquez-Brust, Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 141 (2020) 102025. |
| [25] | L. Li and R.Q. Zhang, Cooperation through capacity sharing between competing forwarders. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 75 (2015) 115-131. |
| [26] | Z. Song, W. Tang and R. Zhao, Ocean carrier canvassing strategies with uncertain demand and limited capacity. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 104 (2017) 189-210. |
| [27] | T.M. Choi and Y. He, Peer-to-peer collaborative consumption for fashion products in the sharing economy: platform operations. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 126 (2019) 49-65. |
| [28] | T.M. Choi, S. Guo, N. Liu and X. Shi, Values of food leftover sharing platforms in the sharing economy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 213 (2019) 23-31. |
| [29] | F. Zeng, H.K. Chan and K. Pawar, The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 141 (2020) 102019. |
| [30] | A.V. Barenji, W.M. Wang, Z. Li and D.A. Guerra-Zubiaga, Intelligent E-commerce logistics platform using hybrid agent based approach. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 126 (2019) 15-31. |
| [31] | K. Cao, Y. Su, Y. Xu and J. Wang, Optimal channel selection of remanufacturing firms with considering asymmetric information in platform economy. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 1259-1281. · Zbl 1489.90038 |
| [32] | C. Wang, M. Leng and L. Liang, Choosing an online retail channel for a manufacturer: direct sales or consignment? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195 (2018) 338-358. |
| [33] | B. Niu, Q. Li, Z. Mu, L. Chen and P. Ji, Platform logistics or self-logistics? Restaurants’ cooperation with online food-delivery platform considering profitability and sustainability. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 234 (2021) 108064. |
| [34] | M. Li, S. Shao, Q. Ye, G. Xu and G.Q. Huang, Blockchain-enabled logistics finance execution platform for capital-constrained E-commerce retail. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 65 (2020) 101962. |
| [35] | J.F. Chaab and O.C. Demirag, Effects of consumer loyalty and product web compatibility on cooperative advertising and pricing policies in a dual-channel supply chain. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 2557-2580. · Zbl 1498.90018 |
| [36] | B. Pal, A. Sarkar and B. Sarkar, Optimal decisions in a dual-channel competitive green supply chain management under promotional effort. Expert Syst. Appl. 211 (2023) 118315. |
| [37] | B.K. Dey, I. Yilmaz and H. Seok, A Sustainable supply chain integrated with autonomated inspection, flexible eco-production, and smart transportation. Processes 10 (2022) 1775. |
| [38] | X. Fu, S. Liu and G. Han, Supply chain partners’ decisions with heterogeneous marketing efforts considering consumer’s perception of quality. RAIRO: OR 55 (2021) 3227-3243. · Zbl 1483.91118 |
| [39] | L. Liu and Y. Li, Greening level and pricing decisions of the green product supply chain in the presence of consumers’ anticipated regret. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 3293-3309. · Zbl 1502.90093 |
| [40] | Y. Gao and L. Fang, Selection of financing strategies and business modes for a capital-constrained manufacturer. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 3219-3244. · Zbl 1501.90038 |
| [41] | T.M. Choi and X. Ouyang, Initial coin offerings for blockchain based product provenance authentication platforms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 233 (2020) 107995. |
| [42] | P. Liu, Z.R. Zhang and F.Y. Dong, Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of big data and blockchain. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 1995-2014. · Zbl 1493.90029 |
| [43] | F. Zarouri, A.A. Khamseh and S.H.R. Pasandideh, Dynamic pricing in a two-echelon stochastic supply chain for perishable products. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 2425-2442. |
| [44] | L. Yan, X. Li, K. Lay Teo, F. Xu and J. Liu, Pricing strategy and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain based on reference quality effect. RAIRO: OR 56 (2022) 2701-2720. · Zbl 1498.90039 |
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.
