×

New venture creation: a drift-variance diffusion control model. (English) Zbl 1508.91608

Summary: We model the creation of a new venture with a novel drift-variance diffusion control framework in which the state of the venture is captured by a diffusion process. The entrepreneur creating the venture chooses costly controls, which determine both the drift and the variance of the process. When the process reaches an upper boundary, the venture succeeds and the entrepreneur receives a reward. When the process reaches a lower boundary, the venture fails. The entrepreneur can choose between two different controls and wishes to determine the policy that maximizes the expected total reward minus total cost. We consider two variations of the model: one in which both boundaries are fixed and one in which only the upper boundary is fixed but the lower is free. We derive closed-form expressions under which the optimal policy will be dynamic versus static; we prove that when the policy is dynamic, it switches between the two controls at most once. The results reveal a subtle trade-off between the cost of the two controls, their drift and their variances, in which controls that are more expensive may be utilized more than controls that are less expensive. We also demonstrate that in the fixed boundary case, the entrepreneur may wastefully use a more expensive control near the lower boundary to avoid hitting that boundary. This implies that efficient utilization of the two controls cannot happen when the entrepreneur does not have the freedom to choose when to abandon the venture.

MSC:

91G50 Corporate finance (dividends, real options, etc.)
49L20 Dynamic programming in optimal control and differential games
93E20 Optimal stochastic control
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):63-72.Google Scholar
[2] Brekke KA, Oksendal B (1994) Optimal switching in an economic activity under uncertainty. SIAM J. Control Optim. 32(4):1021-1036.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0801.60036 · doi:10.1137/S0363012992229835
[3] Byers TH, Dorf RC, Nelson AJ (2011) Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise, vol. 3 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
[4] Carson B (2019) DoorDash is now worth \(12.6 billion after new \)600 million investment. Retrieved September 23, 2020, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bizcarson/2019/05/23/doordash-12-billion-valuation-series-g-funding.Google Scholar
[5] Chess R, Denend L, Zenios S (2006) Genomic health: Launching a paradigm shift … and an innovative new test. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case Study No.OIT49, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
[6] Crunchbase (2019) Overview of DoorDash. Retrieved September 23, 2020, https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/doordash#section-funding-rounds.Google Scholar
[7] Duckworth K, Zervos M (2001) A model for investment decisions with switching costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11(1):239-260.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1083.91055 · doi:10.1214/aoap/998926992
[8] Harrison JM, Sunar N (2015) Investment timing with incomplete information and multiple means of learning. Oper. Res. 63(2):442-457.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1372.91041
[9] Kwon HD, Lippman SA (2011) Acquisition of project-specific assets with Bayesian updating. Oper. Res. 59(5):1119-1130.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1233.91307
[10] Kwon HD, Xu W, Agrawal A, Muthulingam S (2016) Impact of Bayesian learning and externalities on strategic investment. Management Sci. 62(2):550-570.Link, Google Scholar
[11] Lobel I, Patel J, Vulcano G, Zhang J (2016) Optimizing product launches in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 62(6):1778-1799.Link, Google Scholar
[12] Matoglu MO, Vate JV, Wang H (2015) Solving the drift control problem. Stochastic Systems 5(2):324-371.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1350.60088
[13] Oncotype DX Test (2019) Oncotype DX test. Retrieved September 23, 2020, https://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/testing/types/oncotype_dx.Google Scholar
[14] Radner R, Shepp L (1996) Risk vs. profit potential: A model for corporate strategy. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 20(8):1373-1393.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0875.90045 · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(95)00904-3
[15] Roy A (2019) Food-delivery company DoorDash valued at \(7.1 billion in new fund-raising round, nearly double from six months ago. Retrieved September 23, 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/21/doordash-raises-400-million-at-7point1-billion-valuation.Google Schola\)
[16] Sunar N, Birge JR, Vitavasiri S (2019) Optimal dynamic product development and launch for a network of customers. Oper. Res. 67(3):770-790.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1444.90020
[17] Sunar N, Yu S, Kulkarni VG (2020) Competitive investment with Bayesian learning: Choice of business size and timing. Oper. Res., ePub ahead of print March 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2020.2080.Google Scholar
[18] Ulrich K, Eppinger S (2012) Product Design and Development (McGraw Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
[19] Wang Z, Zenios S (2020) Adaptive design of clinical trials: A sequential learning approach. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
[20] Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
[21] Yock PG, Zenios S, Makower J, Brinton TJ, Kumar UN, Watkins J, Denend L (2015) Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1017/CBO9781316095843
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.