×

Optimal dynamic product development and launch for a network of customers. (English) Zbl 1444.90020

Summary: We consider a firm that dynamically chooses its effort to develop a product for a network of customers represented by a connected graph. The technology of the product evolves as a real-valued stochastic process that depends on the firm’s dynamic efforts over time. In addition to dynamically choosing its development effort, the firm chooses when to launch or abandon the product. If the firm launches the product, the firm also chooses a selling price, a promotional price, and a target customer to offer the promotion to. Once the target customer adopts the product, the product diffuses over the customer network based on the topology of the graph and the selling price. The product provides local network benefits to its adopters. The expected local network benefit of adoption is proportional to the number of neighbor customers that have already adopted the product. In a continuous-time setting, we explicitly solve the firm’s jointly optimal development, launch, and post-launch strategies for any connected network. We introduce metrics that allow ordering customer networks with respect to the firm’s optimal expected discounted profit, launch technology, and consumer surplus. We also analyze various extensions, including multiple target customers, heterogeneity in customer demand, and heterogeneity in benefit distributions.
The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1802.

MSC:

90B05 Inventory, storage, reservoirs
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1987) Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Rev. Econom. Statist. 69(4):567-574.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.2307/1935950
[2] Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):678-690.Google Scholar
[3] Bakshi N, Hosanagar K, den Bulte CV (2013) Chase and flight: New product diffusion with social attraction and repulsion. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
[4] Balcer Y, Lippman SA (1984) Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. J. Econom. Theory 34(2):292-318.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0551.90004 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(84)90146-7
[5] Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215-227.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1231.91323
[6] Bethuyne G (2002) The timing of technology adoption by a cost-minimizing firm. J. Econom. 76(2):123-154.Google Scholar · Zbl 1169.91399
[7] Bhaskaran SR, Krishnan V (2009) Effort, revenue, and cost sharing mechanisms for collaborative new product development. Management Sci. 55(7):1152-1169.Link, Google Scholar
[8] Big Think (2015) Big idea: Technology grows exponentially. Accessed March 4, 2017, https://bigthink.com/think-tank/big-idea-technology-grows-exponentially.Google Scholar
[9] Brooks FP (1995) The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, Anniversary Edition, 2/E (Pearson Education, Delhi, India).Google Scholar
[10] Candogan O, Bimpikis K, Ozdaglar A (2012) Optimal pricing in networks with externalities. Oper. Res. 60(4):883-905.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1260.91095
[11] Chandler DL (2013) How to predict the progress of technology. Accessed March 4, 2017, http://news.mit.edu/2013/how-to-predict-the-progress-of-technology-0306.Google Scholar
[12] Cohen MA, Eliasberg J, Ho T-H (1996) New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. 42(2):173-186.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 0881.90081
[13] Cohen WM, Klepper S (1992) The anatomy of industry R&D intensity distributions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(4):773-799.Google Scholar
[14] Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) A reprise of size and R&D. Econom. J. 106(437):925-951.Google Scholar
[15] Columbus L (2014) Where cloud computing is improving supply chain performance: Lessons learned from SCM world. Forbes (February 12), https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2014/02/12/where-cloud-computing-is-improving-supply-chain-performance-lessons-learned-from-scm-world/#3ded6bb867d3.Google Scholar
[16] Dutta PK (1997) Optimal management of an R&D budget. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 21(2):575-602.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0900.90262 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1889(96)00945-1
[17] Farzin YH, Huisman KJ, Kort PM (1998) Optimal timing of technology adoption. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 22(5):779-799.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 0899.90027 · doi:10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00097-3
[18] Friedman TL (2015) Moore’s law turns 50. New York Times (May 13), https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/opinion/thomas-friedman-moores-law-turns-50.html.Google Scholar
[19] Graves SB, Langowitz NS (1993) Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 14(8):593-605.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140803
[20] Graves SB, Langowitz NS (1996) R&D productivity: A global multi-industry comparison. Tech. Forecast. Soc. Change 53(2):125-137.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00068-6
[21] Grenadier SR, Weiss AM (1997) Investment in technological innovations: An option pricing approach. J. Financial Econom. 44(3):397-416.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00009-3
[22] Hackman JR, Coutu D (2009) Why teams don’t work. Interview by Diane Coutu. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87(5):98-105.Google Scholar
[23] Hartline J, Mirrokni V, Sundararajan M (2008) Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 189-198.Google Scholar
[24] Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C (2006) Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. 21(2):256-276.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1426.62374 · doi:10.1214/088342306000000222
[25] HotSchedules (2017) iTunes preview—HotSchedules. Accessed March 1, 2017, https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hotschedules/id294934058?mt=8.Google Scholar
[26] Huchzermeier A, Loch CH (2001) Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. 47(1):85-101.Link, Google Scholar
[27] Jackson MO (2010) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4gh1
[28] Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proc. 9th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 137-146.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1145/956750.956769
[29] Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2005) Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. Automata, Languages and Programming (Springer, Berlin), 1127-1138.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1084.91053 · doi:10.1007/11523468_91
[30] Kimura M, Saito K (2006) Tractable models for information diffusion in social network. Knowledge Discovery Databases: PKDD 2006, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4213 (Springer, Berlin), 259-271.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1007/11871637_27
[31] Klastorin T, Tsai W (2004) New product introduction: Timing, design, and pricing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 6(4):302-320.Link, Google Scholar
[32] Krankel RM, Duenyas I, Kapuscinski R (2006) Timing successive product introductions with demand diffusion and stochastic technology improvement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(2):119-135.Link, Google Scholar
[33] Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1-21.Link, Google Scholar
[34] Kruchten P (2004) The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston).Google Scholar
[35] Kumar S, Swaminathan JM (2003) Diffusion of innovations under supply constraints. Oper. Res. 51(6):866-879.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1165.90475
[36] Kwon HD, Lippman SA, Tang CS (2010) Optimal time-based and cost-based coordinated project contracts with unobservable work rates. Internat. J. Production Econom. 126(2):247-254.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.03.013
[37] Liu H, Özer Ö (2009) Managing a product family under stochastic technological changes. Internat. J. Production Econom. 122(2):567-580.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.039
[38] Lobel I, Patel J, Vulcano G, Zhang J (2015) Optimizing product launches in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. 62(6):1778-1799.Link, Google Scholar
[39] McCardle KF (1985) Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. 31(11):1372-1389.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 0599.90072
[40] Özer Ö, Uncu O (2013) Competing on time: An integrated framework to optimize dynamic time-to-market and production decisions. Production Oper. Management 22(3):473-488.Crossref, Google Scholar · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01413.x
[41] Özer Ö, Uncu O (2015) Integrating dynamic time-to-market, pricing, production and sales channel decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242(2):487-500.Crossref, Google Scholar · Zbl 1341.90076 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.001
[42] Quick Appointments (2016) Quick Appointments, Android. Accessed March 1, 2017, https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nordic_tomato.drappointmentpro.Google Scholar
[43] Rahmani M, Ramachandran K (2017) Delegating innovation services. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
[44] Salas E, Tannenbaum S, Cohen D, Latham G (2013) Developing and Enhancing Teamwork in Organizations: Evidence-Based Best Practices and Guidelines, vol. 33 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
[45] Savin S, Terwiesch C (2005) Optimal product launch times in a duopoly: Balancing life-cycle revenues with product cost. Oper. Res. 53(1):26-47.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1165.90521
[46] Shane SA, Ulrich KT (2004) 50th anniversary article: Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in Management Science. Management Sci. 50(2):133-144.Link, Google Scholar
[47] Sharif B, Khan SA, Bhatti MW (2012) Measuring the impact of changing requirements on software project cost: An empirical investigation. Internat. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 9(3):170-174.Google Scholar
[48] Shen W, Duenyas I, Kapuscinski R (2011) New product diffusion decisions under supply constraints. Management Sci. 57(10):1802-1810.Link, Google Scholar
[49] Shields A (2014) Must-know: Enterprise resource planning. Accessed November 15, 2015, https://marketrealist.com/2014/07/must-know-enterprise-resource-planning/.Google Scholar
[50] Smith JE, Ulu C (2012) Technology adoption with uncertain future costs and quality. Oper. Res. 60(2):262-274.Link, Google Scholar · Zbl 1248.91031
[51] Tan T (2012) Domain-based effort distribution model for software cost estimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
[52] Viticci F (2011) Eavesdrop: Share your iOS music library over WiFi & Bluetooth. MacStories (blog) (March 27),
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.