×

Big principal series, \(p\)-adic families and \(\mathcal{L}\)-invariants. (English) Zbl 1500.11041

The paper proves several results about automorphic \(\mathcal L\)-invariants for reductive groups previously constructed by the first author in [J. Reine Angew. Math. 779, 57–103 (2021; Zbl 1482.11076)], generalizing a construction by M. Spieß in the case of Hilbert modular forms in [Invent. Math. 196, No. 1, 69–138 (2014; Zbl 1392.11027)], which in turn was inspired by H. Darmon’s construction in [Ann. Math. (2) 154, No. 3, 589–639 (2001; Zbl 1035.11027)].
The main result is a generalization of the classical formula \(\mathcal L^\pm(f)=-2\frac{da_p}{dk}\Big|_{k=2}\) for the \(\mathcal L\)-invariant of a classical weight \(2\) newform due to M. Bertolini et al. [Astérisque 331, 29–64 (2010; Zbl 1251.11033)].
In order to state the result, we need to recall the notion of \(\mathcal L\)-invariant under consideration.
Fix a connected, adjoint, semi-simple linear algebraic group \(G\) over a number field \(F\) and a cuspidal automorphic representation \(\pi\) of \(G\) with the following three properties: (i) \(\pi\) is cohomological with respect to trivial coefficients; (ii) \(\pi\) is tempered at all archimedean places; (iii) for a fixed finite place \(\mathfrak{p}\) of \(F\), \(G\) is split over \(F_{\mathfrak{p}}\) and the \(G(F_{\mathfrak{p}})\)-representation \(\pi_\mathfrak{p}\) is the smooth Steinberg representation \(\mathrm{St}_{G(F_{\mathfrak{p}})}^\infty(\mathbb C)\).
Any such \(\pi\) admits a model over a number field \(\mathbb Q(\pi)\) ( see [Zbl 1403.11042]). Fix a finite extension \(E/\mathbb Q_p\) together with an embedding \(\mathbb Q(\pi)\to E\), with respect to which we may consider models of \(\pi\) and \(\pi_{\mathfrak{p}}\) over \(E\).
Then for each simple root \(i\) of \(G\) and a sign character \(\varepsilon\), Gehrmann gave a cohomological definition of a space of \(\mathcal L\)-invariants \(\mathcal L_i(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\subseteq\operatorname{Hom}^{\mathrm{ct}}(F_{\mathfrak{p}}^\ast,E)\). Strictly speaking, this notion of \(\mathcal L\)-invariant depends on the cohomological degree \(q\). We henceforth assume that strong multiplicity one holds for \(\pi\) (hypothesis SMO). This then implies that the above subspace of \(\mathcal L\)-invariants is of codimension at least one. For details, see [Zbl 1482.11076].
The authors introduce the notion of \(\mathfrak{p}\)-étale point \(\mathfrak{m}_\pi\in\mathrm{Spm}\,\mathbb T_{\mathrm{sph}}\) for a suitable commutative Hecke algebra \(\mathbb T_{\mathrm{sph}}\) which at \(\mathfrak{p}\) is of Iwahori level, assuming that \(G\) satisfies Harish-Chandra’s condition at infinity and that the maximal ideal \(\mathfrak{m}_\pi\) attached to \(\pi\) is non-Eisenstein in the sense that the cohomology of the associated locally symmetric space is supported at \(\mathfrak{m}_\pi\) only in middle degree (hypothesis NE).
Then there is a sufficiently small open affinoid \(\mathcal U\) around \( 1\!\! 1\) in the affinoid space corresponding to the localization \(\mathbb T_{\mathrm{sph},\mathfrak{m}_\pi}\) such that the following holds.
Assuming that \(\mathfrak{m}_\pi\) is \(\mathfrak{p}\)-étale with associated character \(\chi_\alpha:T\to\mathcal O_{\mathcal U}^\times\), for every tangent vector \(v\) of \(\mathcal U\) at \(1\!\! 1\) Gehrmann-Rosso prove that \(\frac{\partial}{\partial v}\chi_{\alpha}\circ i^\vee\in\mathcal L_i(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\) for every simple root \(i\) of \(G\).
Moreover, the codimension of \(\mathcal L_i(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\) in \(\operatorname{Hom}^{\mathrm{ct}}(F_{\mathfrak{p}}^\ast,E)\) is precisely one in this case.
The proof is based on an automorphic Colmez-Greenberg-Stevens formula, i.e., an interpretation of \(\mathcal L\)-invariants in terms of infinitesimal deformations, which in turn relates \(\mathcal L\)-invariants to the existence of cohomology classes with values in duals of families of principal series representations.
As an application, the authors show that their theory, applied to inner forms \(G\) of \(\mathrm{PGL}_2\) over the totally real field \(F\), settles two conjectures of Spieß: Assuming \(G\) split at \(\mathfrak{p}\), in this setting the automorphic \(\mathcal L\)-invariants \(\mathcal L(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\) for the unique positive root are independent of the sign character \(\varepsilon\) and are invariant under Jacquet-Langlands transfer. Moreover, the authors show that in this case the automorphic \(\mathcal L\)-invariant \(\mathcal L(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\) agrees with the Fontaine-Mazur \(\mathcal L\)-invariant \(\mathcal L^{\mathrm{FM}}(\rho_{\pi,\mathfrak{p}})\) attached to the Galois representation \(\rho_\pi\) associated to \(\pi\).
Similar results hold for adjoints \(G\) of definite unitary groups of rank \(n-1\) over \(F\): Again assuming \(G\) split at \(\mathfrak{p}\), for any cuspidal automorphic representation \(\pi\) of \(G\), trivial at all archimedean places and Steinberg at \(\mathfrak{p}\), again assuming strong multiplicity one and \(\mathfrak{m}_\pi\) being \(\mathfrak{p}\)-étale and \(\rho_\pi\) irreducible the authors prove the identity \(\mathcal L_i^{\mathrm{FM}}(\rho_{\pi,\mathfrak{p}})=\mathcal L_i(\pi,\mathfrak{p})^\varepsilon\) where \(i\) indexes the \(n-1\) canonical two-dimensional subquotients of \(\rho_{\pi,\mathfrak{p}}\) and the \(n-1\) simple roots of \(G\).
Finally, the authors also consider identities and invariants of automorphic \(\mathcal L\)-invariants attached to Bianchi newforms \(f\) of weight \(2\), which simplify in the case when \(f\) is a base change of a classical modular form. When extended to higher weight, Gehrmann-Rosso’s approach makes the construction of Stark-Heegner cycles attached to Bianchi modular forms by G. Venkat and C. Williams [J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 104, No. 1, 394–422 (2021; Zbl 1490.11055)] unconditional.

MSC:

11F55 Other groups and their modular and automorphic forms (several variables)
11F33 Congruences for modular and \(p\)-adic modular forms
11F70 Representation-theoretic methods; automorphic representations over local and global fields
11F75 Cohomology of arithmetic groups
11F80 Galois representations

References:

[1] Ash, A. and Stevens, G., \(p\)-adic deformations of arithmetic cohomology, Preprint (2008), https://math.bu.edu/people/ghs/preprints/Ash-Stevens-02-08.pdf. · Zbl 0866.20038
[2] Barnet-Lamb, T., Gee, T., Geraghty, D. and Taylor, R., Potential automorphy and change of weight, Ann. of Math. (2)179 (2014), 501-609. · Zbl 1310.11060
[3] Barrera Salazar, D., Dimitrov, M. and Jorza, A., \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions of Hilbert cusp forms and the trivial zero conjecture, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2021), doi:10.4171/JEMS/1165. · Zbl 1523.11092
[4] Barrera Salazar, D. and Williams, C., Exceptional zeros and \(\mathcal{L} \)-invariants of Bianchi modular forms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), 1-34. · Zbl 1443.11060
[5] Barrera Salazar, D. and Williams, C., Families of Bianchi modular symbols: critical base-change \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions and \(p\)-adic Artin formalism, Selecta Math. (N.S.)27 (2021), 82. · Zbl 1480.11054
[6] Benois, D., \(p\)-adic heights and \(p\)-adic Hodge theory, Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N.S.)167 (2021). · Zbl 1465.11207
[7] Bertolini, M., Darmon, H. and Iovita, A., Families of automorphic forms on definite quaternion algebras and Teitelbaum’s conjecture, Astérisque331 (2010), 29-64. · Zbl 1251.11033
[8] Borel, A., Admissible representations of a semi-simple group over a local field with vector fixed under an Iwahori subgroup, Invent. Math. 35 (1976), 233-260. · Zbl 0334.22012
[9] Borel, A. and Serre, J.-P., Cohomologie d’immeubles et de groupes S-arithmétiques, Topology15 (1976), 211-232. · Zbl 0338.20055
[10] Caraiani, A., Monodromy and local-global compatibility for \(l=p\), Algebra Number Theory8 (2014), 1597-1646. · Zbl 1310.11061
[11] Cartier, P., Representations of p-adic groups: a survey, in Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, , vol. XXXIII (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979), 111-155. · Zbl 0421.22010
[12] Chenevier, G., The p-adic analytic space of pseudocharacters of a profinite group and pseudorepresentations over arbitrary rings, in Automorphic forms and Galois representations. Vol. 1, , vol. 414 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014), 221-285. · Zbl 1350.11063
[13] Darmon, H., Integration on \(H_{ p}\times H\) and arithmetic applications, Ann. of Math. (2)154 (2001), 589-639. · Zbl 1035.11027
[14] Dasgupta, S., Stark-Heegner points on modular jacobians, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér (4)38 (2005), 427-469. · Zbl 1173.11334
[15] Dasgupta, S. and Greenberg, M., L-invariants and Shimura curves, Algebra Number Theory6 (2012), 455-485. · Zbl 1285.11072
[16] Ding, Y., Simple \(\mathcal{L} \)-invariants for \(\text{GL}_n\), Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), 7993-8042. · Zbl 1446.11106
[17] Gehrmann, L., Derived Hecke algebra and automorphic L-invariants, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 372 (2019), 7767-7784. · Zbl 1472.11141
[18] Gehrmann, L., Functoriality of automorphic \(L\)-invariants and applications, Doc. Math. 24 (2019), 1225-1243. · Zbl 1469.11106
[19] Gehrmann, L., Automorphic \(\mathcal{L} \)-invariants for reductive groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 779 (2021), 57-103. · Zbl 1482.11076
[20] Geraghty, D., Modularity lifting theorems for ordinary Galois representations, Math. Ann. 373 (2019), 1341-1427. · Zbl 1539.11080
[21] Goldring, W., Galois representations associated to holomorphic limits of discrete series, Compos. Math. 150 (2014), 191-228. · Zbl 1309.11038
[22] Greenberg, M., Stark-Heegner points and the cohomology of quaternionic Shimura varieties, Duke Math. J. 147 (2009), 541-575. · Zbl 1183.14030
[23] Guitart, X., Masdeu, M. and Sengün, M. H., Darmon points on elliptic curves over number fields of arbitrary signature, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3)111 (2015), 484-518. · Zbl 1391.11081
[24] Hansen, D., Universal eigenvarieties, trianguline Galois representations, and \(p\)-adic Langlands functoriality, J. Reine Angew. Math. 730 (2017), 1-64, with an appendix by James Newton. · Zbl 1425.11117
[25] Howe, R. and Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I., Some examples of automorphic forms on \({\rm Sp}_4\), Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 55-106. · Zbl 0529.22012
[26] Jacquet, H. and Shalika, J. A., On Euler products and the classification of automorphic forms. II, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), 777-815. · Zbl 0491.10020
[27] Jacquet, H. and Shalika, J. A., On Euler products and the classification of automorphic representations. I, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), 499-558. · Zbl 0473.12008
[28] Januszewski, F., Rational structures on automorphic representations, Math. Ann. 370 (2018), 1805-1881. · Zbl 1403.11042
[29] Knapp, A. W., Representation theory of semisimple groups, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001). An overview based on examples, reprint of the 1986 original. · Zbl 0993.22001
[30] Kohlhaase, J., The cohomology of locally analytic representations, J. Reine Angew. Math. 651 (2011), 187-240. · Zbl 1226.22020
[31] Kohlhaase, J. and Schraen, B., Homological vanishing theorems for locally analytic representations, Math. Ann. 353 (2012), 219-258. · Zbl 1259.22012
[32] Longo, M., Rotger, V. and Vigni, S., On rigid analytic uniformization of Jacobians of Shimura curves, Amer. J. Math. 134 (2012), 1197-1246. · Zbl 1294.11099
[33] Ollivier, R., Resolutions for principal series representations of \(p\)-adic \({\rm GL}_n\), Münster J. Math. 7 (2014), 225-240. · Zbl 1316.22015
[34] Orlik, S., On extensions of generalized Steinberg representations, J. Algebra293 (2005), 611-630. · Zbl 1080.22008
[35] Orton, L., An elementary proof of a weak exceptional zero conjecture, Can. J. Math. 56 (2004), 373-405. · Zbl 1060.11030
[36] Piatetski-Shapiro, I. I., Multiplicity one theorems, in Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1, , vol. XXXIII (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979), 209-212. · Zbl 0423.22017
[37] Reeder, M., On certain Iwahori invariants in the unramified principal series, Pacific J. Math. 153 (1992), 313-342. · Zbl 0804.22010
[38] Rosso, G., \( \mathcal{L} \)-invariant for Siegel-Hilbert forms, Doc. Math. 20 (2015), 1227-1253. · Zbl 1376.11073
[39] Saito, T., Hilbert modular forms and \(p\)-adic Hodge theory, Compos. Math. 145 (2009), 1081-1113. · Zbl 1259.11060
[40] Scholze, P., On torsion in the cohomology of locally symmetric varieties, Ann. of Math. (2)182 (2015), 945-1066. · Zbl 1345.14031
[41] Seveso, M. A., The Teitelbaum conjecture in the indefinite setting, Amer. J. Math. 135 (2013), 1525-1557. · Zbl 1288.11051
[42] Soudry, D., A uniqueness theorem for representations of \({\rm GSO}(6)\) and the strong multiplicity one theorem for generic representations of \({\rm GSp}(4)\), Israel J. Math. 58 (1987), 257-287. · Zbl 0642.22003
[43] Spieß, M., On special zeros of \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions of Hilbert modular forms, Invent. Math. 196 (2014), 69-138. · Zbl 1392.11027
[44] Spieß, M., On \(\mathcal{L} \)-invariants associated to Hilbert modular forms, Preprint (2020), arXiv:2005.11892.
[45] Taylor, R., On Galois representations associated to Hilbert modular forms, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), 265-280. · Zbl 0705.11031
[46] Teitelbaum, J. T., Values of \(p\)-adic \(L\)-functions and a \(p\)-adic Poisson kernel, Invent. Math. 101 (1990), 395-410. · Zbl 0731.11065
[47] Thorne, J. A., Automorphy lifting for residually reducible \(l\)-adic Galois representations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), 785-870. · Zbl 1396.11087
[48] Urban, E., Eigenvarieties for reductive groups, Ann. of Math. (2)174 (2011), 1685-1784. · Zbl 1285.11081
[49] Venkat, G. and Williams, C., Stark-Heegner cycles attached to Bianchi modular forms, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 104 (2021), 394-422. · Zbl 1490.11055
[50] Vignéras, M.-F., A criterion for integral structures and coefficient systems on the tree of \({\rm PGL}(2, F)\), Pure Appl. Math. Q. 4 (2008), 1291-1316. · Zbl 1192.22010
[51] Wiles, A., On ordinary \(\lambda \)-adic representations associated to modular forms, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), 529-573. · Zbl 0664.10013
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.