×

Critical tests of the two high-threshold model of recognition via analyses of hazard functions. (English) Zbl 1479.91289

Summary: The research described in this paper began with the goal to develop critical tests of the two-high-threshold model of memory. Based on initial findings by D. Kellen and K. C. Klauer [“Discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: testing core properties under minimal assumptions”, J. Exp. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40, No. 6, 1795–1804 (2014; doi:10.1037/xlm0000016)], we focus on a ranking task in which one target and \(n - 1\) foils are ranked in decreasing order of perceived likelihood of being the target. The resulting distribution of interest is the probability that the target is ranked in position \(k\). We show that the two-high-threshold model predicts that the hazard function of this distribution increases monotonically for \(k > 1\). We generalize this result to the case in which each foil has a different probability of being detected under the model. These results are compared with two alternative models for recognition memory. The research exploring these issues has led us to an investigation of the Poisson-binomial distribution, showing that it too has a monotonically increasing hazard. In our opinion this finding is novel and significant because the Poisson binomial distribution can have many other applications outside of memory research and outside of psychology. In addition it is proved that any memory theory for the ranking task, which produces rank probabilities that form a strictly log-concave sequence, predicts a monotonically increasing hazard function. The hazard function for the ranking task for a single experimental condition thus enables a critical test for a potentially large class of memory theories other than just the two-high-threshold model.

MSC:

91E10 Cognitive psychology
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Aitken, A. C., Statistical mathematics (1945), Oliver and Boyd: Oliver and Boyd Edinburgh · JFM 65.1350.05
[2] Atkinson, R. C.; Juola, J. F., Search and decision processes in recognition memory, (Krantz, D. H.; Luce, R. D.; Suppes, P., Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, vol. 1. Learning, memory and thinking (1974), Freeman: Freeman San Francisco, CA), 243-293 · Zbl 0288.92020
[3] Barlow, R. E.; Proschan, F., Statistical analysis of reliability and life-testing methods (1965), Marcel Dekker: Marcel Dekker New York · Zbl 0132.39302
[4] Bertoin, J.; LeJan, Y., Representation of measures by balayage from a regular point, The Annals of Probability, 20, 538-548 (1992) · Zbl 0749.60038
[5] Brenti, F., Unimodal, log-concave and Pólya frequency sequences in combinatorics (1988), MIT, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) · Zbl 0697.05011
[6] Bröder, A.; Schütz, J., Recognition ROCs are curvilinear - or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 587-606 (2009)
[7] Chechile, R. A., Likelihood and posterior identification: Implications for mathematical psychology, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30, 177-184 (1977) · Zbl 0371.62044
[8] Chechile, R. A., Mathematical tools for hazard function analysis, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 478-494 (2003) · Zbl 1077.91043
[9] Chechile, R. A., New multinomial models for the Chechile-Meyer task, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 364-384 (2004) · Zbl 1173.91451
[10] Chechile, R. A., Memory hazard functions: A vehicle for theory development and test, Psychological Review, 113, 31-56 (2006)
[11] Chechile, R. A., A novel Bayesian parameter mapping method for estimating the parameters of an underlying scientific model, Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods, 39, 1190-1201 (2010) · Zbl 1188.62352
[12] Chechile, R. A., A novel method for assessing rival models of recognition memory, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 196-214 (2013) · Zbl 1292.91153
[13] Chechile, R. A., Using a multinomial tree model for detecting mixtures in perceptual detection, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 641 pp. (2014), 1-11
[14] Chechile, R. A., Analyzing memory: The formation, retention, and measurement of memory (2018), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[15] Chechile, R. A., Bayesian statistics for experimental scientist: A general introduction using distribution-free statistics (2020), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1444.62002
[16] Chechile, R. A.; Pintea, G. I., Measuring components of the memory of order, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 100, Article 102476 pp. (2021) · Zbl 1471.91423
[17] Chechile, R. A.; Sloboda, L. N.; Chamberland, J. R., Obtaining separate measures for implicit and explicit memory, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 35-53 (2012) · Zbl 1238.91124
[18] Chechile, R. A.; Soraci, S. A., Evidence for a multiple-process account of the generation effect, Memory, 7, 483-508 (1999)
[19] Drèze, J. H., Bayesian theory of identification in simultaneous equation models, (Fienberg, S.; Zellner, A., Studies in Bayesian econometrics and statistics (1975), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam), 159-174
[20] Dube, C.; Rotello, C. M., Binary ROCs in perception and recognition memory are curved, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 130-151 (2012)
[21] Dube, C.; Starns, J. J.; Rotello, C. M.; Ratcliff, R., Beyond ROC curvature: Strength effects and response time data support continuous evidence models of recognition memory, Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 389-406 (2012)
[22] Egan, J. P., Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (technical note AFCRC-TN-58-51) (1958), Hearing and Communication Laboratory, Indiana University
[23] Feller, W., An introduction to probability theory and its applications (1957), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0077.12201
[24] Graczyk, P., Cramér theorem on symmetric spaces of noncompact type, Journal of Theoretical Probability, 7, 609-613 (1994) · Zbl 0808.60013
[25] Hong, Y., On computing the distribution function for the Poisson binomial distribution, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 59, 41-51 (2013) · Zbl 1400.62036
[26] Johnson, N. L.; Kotz, S.; Kemp, A. W., Univariate discrete distributions (1992), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0773.62007
[27] Kalish, M. L.; Dunn, J. C.; Burdakov, O. P.; Sysoev, O., A statistical test of the equality of latent orders, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 70, 1-11 (2016) · Zbl 1359.62502
[28] Karlin, S., Total positivity: vol. 1 (1968), Stanford University Press: Stanford University Press Stanford, CA · Zbl 0219.47030
[29] Keilson, J.; Gerber, H., Some results for discrete unimodality, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 386-389 (1971) · Zbl 0236.60017
[30] Kellen, D.; Klauer, K. C., Discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: Testing core properties under minimal assumptions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1795-1804 (2014)
[31] Kellen, D.; Klauer, K. C., Signal detection and threshold modeling of confidence-rating ROCs: A critical test with minimal assumptions, Psychological Review, 122, 542-557 (2015)
[32] Laming, D., Mathematical psychology (1973), Academic Press: Academic Press London
[33] Luce, R. D., Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization (1986), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York
[34] Rao, C. R.; Shanbhag, D. N., An elementary proof for an extended version of the Choquet-Deny theorem, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 38, 141-148 (1991) · Zbl 0732.60009
[35] Samuels, S. M., On the number of successes in independent trials, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36, 1272-1278 (1965) · Zbl 0156.40506
[36] Snodgrass, J. G.; Corwin, J., Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50 (1988)
[37] Steffensen, J. F., Some recent researches in the theory of statistics and actuarial science (1930), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press New York · JFM 56.1095.01
[38] Stevens, S. S., Toward a resolution of the fechner-thurstone legacy, Psychometrika, 26, 35-47 (1961)
[39] Swets, J. A., Is there a sensory threshold?, Science, 134, 168-177 (1961)
[40] Tanner, W. P.; Swets, J. A., A decision-making theory of visual detection, Psychological Review, 61, 401-409 (1954)
[41] Thomas, E. A.C., Sufficient conditions for monotone hazard rate and applications to latency-probability curves, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 303-332 (1971)
[42] Townsend, J. T.; Ashby, F. G., Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems, (Castellan, N. J.; Restle, F., Cognitive theory, vol. 3 (1978), Erlbaum: Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ), 199-239
[43] Townsend, J. T.; Ashby, F. G., The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes (1983), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK · Zbl 0595.92015
[44] Van Zandt, T., Analysis of response time distributions, (Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology, vol. 4: Methodology in experimental psychology (2002), Wiley: Wiley New York), 461-516
[45] Wang, Y. H., On the number of successes in independent trials, Statistica Sinica, 3, 295-312 (1993) · Zbl 0822.60006
[46] Yonelinas, A. P.; Parks, C. M., Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review, Psychological Bulletin, 133, 800-832 (2007)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.