×

Obtaining separate measures for implicit and explicit memory. (English) Zbl 1238.91124

Summary: In this paper a new model, the Implicit/Explicit Separation (IES) model, is developed and applied. The model is designed to obtain separate probability measures for explicit memory storage, implicit memory storage, fractional storage, and non-storage. The model is needed because memory research has shown the importance of the distinction between a conscious memory of a target event and a memory residue that is unable to support conscious recall or confident recognition, but it is still able to support guessing at rates above chance. Maximum likelihood and population-parameter mapping estimates for the parameters of the IES model are provided. The accuracy of parameter estimates is studied as a function of sample size. Three experiments are reported to demonstrate how the IES model is used to achieve a more fine grained assessment of the quality of information storage. These experiments also provide strong validation support for the IES model itself. Across the three experiments, each of the four components for representing target information (explicit, implicit, fractional, and non-storage) demonstrates a different pattern. The IES model is discussed in terms of alternative models such as the dual-process model and the process-dissociation model.

MSC:

91E40 Memory and learning in psychology
62P15 Applications of statistics to psychology

Software:

GPT.EXE
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Arslan, O.; Constable, P. D.L.; Kent, J. T., Domains of convergence for the EM algorithm: a cautionary tale in a location estimation problem, Statistics and Computing, 3, 103-108 (1993)
[2] Atkinson, R. C.; Juola, J. F., Search and decision processes in recognition memory, (Krantz, D. H.; Atkinson, R. C.; Luce, R. D.; Suppes, P., Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: vol. 1, learning, memory, an thinking (1974), Freeman: Freeman San Franciso), 242-293 · Zbl 0288.92020
[3] Batchelder, W. H.; Riefer, D. M., Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86 (1999)
[4] Buchner, A.; Erdfelder, E.; Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B., Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160 (1995)
[5] Buchner, A.; Wippich, W., Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?, Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 197-220 (1996)
[6] Chechile, R. A., Trace susceptibility theory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 203-222 (1987)
[7] Chechile, R. A., A new method for estimating model parameters for multinomial data, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 432-471 (1998) · Zbl 0969.62073
[8] Chechile, R. A., New multinomial models for the chechile-Meyer task, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 48, 364-384 (2004) · Zbl 1173.91451
[9] Chechile, R. A., Memory hazard functions: a vehicle for theory development and test, Psychological Review, 113, 31-56 (2006)
[10] Chechile, R. A., A model-based storage-retrieval analysis of developmental dyslexia, (Neufeld, R. W.J., Advances in clinical cognitive science: formal modeling of processes and symptoms (2007), American Psychological Association: American Psychological Association Washington, D.C.), 51-79
[11] Chechile, R. A., Pooling data versus averaging model fits for some prototypical multinomial processing tree models, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 562-576 (2009) · Zbl 1182.91152
[12] Chechile, R. A., A novel Bayesian parameter mapping method for estimating the parameters of an underlying scientific model, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 39, 1190-1201 (2010) · Zbl 1188.62352
[13] Chechile, R. A., Modeling storage and retrieval processes with clinical populations with applications examining alcohol-induced amnesia and Korsakoff amnesia, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 150-166 (2010) · Zbl 1203.91267
[14] Chechile, R. A.; Meyer, D. L., A Bayesian procedure for separately estimating storage and retrieval components of forgetting, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13, 269-295 (1976) · Zbl 0351.92030
[15] Chechile, R. A.; Roder, B., Model-based measurement of group differences: an application directed toward understanding the information-processing mechanisms of developmental dyslexia, (Soraci, S.; McIlvane, W. J., Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning: a survey of research approaches (1998), Ablex: Ablex Stamford, CN), 91-112
[16] Chechile, R. A.; Soraci, S. A., Evidence for a multiple-process account of the generation effect, Memory, 7, 483-508 (1999)
[17] Cheng, R. C.H., Generating beta variates with non-integral shape parameters, Communication for the Association for Computing Machinery, 21, 317-322 (1978) · Zbl 0379.65004
[18] Cohen, N.; Squire, L. R., Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skills in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that, Science, 210, 207-210 (1980)
[19] DeCarlo, L. T., Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory, Psychological Review, 109, 710-721 (2002)
[20] Dempster, A. P.; Laird, N. M.; Rubin, D. B., Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38 (1977) · Zbl 0364.62022
[21] Dodson, C. S.; Johnson, M. K., Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194 (1996)
[22] Erdfelder, E.; Aver, T.-S.; Hilbig, B. E.; Aßfalg, A.; Moshagen, M.; Nadarevic, L., Multinomial processing tree models: a review of the literature, Zeithschrift fur¨ Psychologie/ Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124 (2009)
[23] Gaunt, R.; Leynes, J.; Demoulin, S., Intergroup relations and the attribution of emotions: control over memory for secondary emotions associated with the ingroup and outgroup, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 508-514 (2002)
[24] Gerrein, J. R.; Chechile, R. A., Storage and retrieval processes of alcohol- induced amnesia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 285-294 (1977)
[25] Graf, P.; Schacter, D. L., Selective effects of interference on implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic patients, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501-518 (1987)
[26] Hirschman, E.; Bjork, R. A., The generation effect: support for a two-factor theory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 484-494 (1988)
[27] Hu, X.; Phillips, G. A., GPT.EXE: a powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 220-234 (1999)
[28] Jacoby, L. L., A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory, Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541 (1991)
[29] Jacoby, L. L.; Toth, J. P.; Yonelinas, A. P., Separating conscious and unconscious influence of memory: measuring recollection, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154 (1993)
[30] Johnson, M. K., A multiple-entry, modular memory system, (Bower, G. H., The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 17 (1983), Academic Press: Academic Press New York), 81-123
[31] Kucera, H.; Francis, W. N., Computational analysis of present-day American english (1967), Brown University Press: Brown University Press Providence, RI
[32] Mandler, G., Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence, Psychological Review, 87, 252-271 (1980)
[33] McBride, D. M.; Dosher, B. A., Forgetting rates are comparable in conscious and automatic memory: a process-dissociation study, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 583-607 (1999)
[34] McBride, D. M.; Dosher, B. A.; Gage, N. M., A comparison of forgetting for conscious and automatic processes in word fragment completion tasks, Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 585-615 (2001)
[35] Parkin, A. J., Implicit memory across the lifespan, (Graf, P.; Masson, M. E.J., Implicit memory: new directions in cognition, development, and neuro- psychology (1993), Erlbaum: Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ), 191-206
[36] Roediger, H. L., Implicit memory: retention without remembering, American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056 (1990)
[37] Roediger III, H. L.; McDermott, K. B., Implicit memory in normal human subjects, (Spinnler, H.; Boller, F., Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 8 (1993), Elsevier: Elsevier Amsterdam), 63-131
[38] Roenker, D. L.; Wenger, S. K.; Thompson, C. P.; Watkins, B., Depth of processing: when the principle of congruity fails, Memory & Cognition, 6, 288-295 (1978)
[39] Rovee-Collier, C., Dissociations in infant memory: rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory, Psychological Review, 104, 467-498 (1997)
[40] Rumelhart, D. E.; McClelland, J. L.; The PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: foundations (1986), MIT Press: MIT Press Cambridge, MA
[41] Schacter, D. L., Implicit memory: history and current status, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518 (1987)
[42] Schacter, D. L., On the relation between memory and consciousness: dissociable interactions and conscious experience, (Roediger, H. L.; Craik, F. I.M., Varieties of memory and consciousness: essays in honour of Endel Tulving (1989), Erlbaum: Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ), 355-389
[43] Schacter, D. L.; Chin, C.-Y. P.; Ochsner, K. N., Implicit memory: a selective review, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 159-182 (1993)
[44] Slamecka, N. J.; Graf, P., The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604 (1978)
[45] Squire, L. R., Mechanisms of memory, Science, 232, 1612-1619 (1986)
[46] Squire, L. R., Memory and brain (1987), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York
[47] Tulving, E., Elements of episodic memory (1983), Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press New York
[48] Tulving, E., How many memory systems are there?, American Psychologist, 40, 385-398 (1985)
[49] Vaida, F., Parameter convergence for EM and MM algorithms, Statistica Sinica, 15, 831-840 (2005) · Zbl 1087.62035
[50] Warrington, E. K.; Weiskrantz, L., The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients, Neuropsychologia, 12, 419-428 (1974)
[51] Weiskrantz, L., Neuroanatomy of memory and amnesia: a case for multiple memory systems, Human Neurobiology, 6, 93-105 (1987)
[52] Weiskrantz, L., Remembering dissociations, (Roediger, H. L.; Craik, F. I.M., Varieties of memory and consciousness: essays in honour of Endel Tulving (1989), Erlbaum: Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ), 101-120
[53] Witmer, L. R., The association value of three-place consonant syllables, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 47, 337-359 (1935)
[54] Yonelinas, A. P., Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual process model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1341-1354 (1994)
[55] Yu, J.; Bellezza, F. S., Process dissociation as source monitoring, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1518-1533 (2000)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.