×

Learning from like-minded people. (English) Zbl 1458.91169

Summary: We propose a social learning model where agents choose who to communicate with based on the trade-off between collecting information and influencing others’ actions. Like-minded people reveal more truthful information, but talking to someone different makes an agent more likely to influence another person’s action, because like-minded people will take similar actions anyway. In our model agents start with heterogeneous priors about an unknown state of the world. First agents form coalitions of communication partners. Then everyone observes a private i.i.d. signal and sends a message to her partner. Finally everyone takes an action based on her prior, her private signal, and her partner’s message. Our main finding is that when signals and actions are binary, agents form assortative coalitions, even though assortative coalitions are inefficient for social welfare.

MSC:

91D15 Social learning
91A28 Signaling and communication in game theory
91B15 Welfare economics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Allcott, H.; Boxell, L.; Conway, J. C.; Gentzkow, M.; Thaler, M.; Yang, D. Y., Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic (2020), Working Paper
[2] Alonso, R.; Camara, O., Bayesian persuasion with heterogeneous priors, J. Econ. Theory, 165, 672-706 (2016) · Zbl 1371.91040
[3] Asker, J.; Baccaray, M.; Lee, S., Patent Auctions and Bidding Coalitions: Structuring the Sale of Club Goods (2020), Working Paper
[4] Baccara, M.; Yariv, L., Homophily in peer groups, Am. Econ. J. Microecon., 5, 69-96 (2013)
[5] Banerjee, A.; Somanathan, R., A simple model of voice, Q. J. Econ., 116, 189-227 (2001) · Zbl 0979.91021
[6] Banerjee, S.; Konishi, H.; Sönmez, T., Core in a simple coalition formation game, Soc. Choice Welf., 18, 135-153 (2001) · Zbl 1069.91504
[7] Basurto, P.; Dupas, P.; Robinson, J., Decentralization and Efficiency of Subsidy Targeting: Evidence from Chiefs in Rural Malawi (2019), Working Paper
[8] Benabou, R.; Tirole, J., Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets, Q. J. Econ., 126, 805-855 (2011) · Zbl 1219.91050
[9] Boxell, L.; Gentzkow, M.; Shapiro, J., Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 114 (2017)
[10] Brunnermeier, M. K.; Simsek, A.; Xiong, W., A welfare criterion for models with distorted beliefs, Q. J. Econ., 1753-1797 (2014) · Zbl 1400.91167
[11] Che, Y.; Kartik, N., Opinions as incentives, J. Polit. Econ., 117, 815-860 (2009)
[12] Crawford, V.; Sobel, J., Strategic information transmission, Econometrica, 50, 1431-1451 (1982) · Zbl 0494.94007
[13] DellaVigna, S.; List, J.; Malmendier, U., Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving, Q. J. Econ., 127, 1-56 (2012) · Zbl 1400.91168
[14] Ellickson, B.; Grodal, B.; Scotchmer, S.; Zame, W. R., Clubs and the market, Econometrica, 67, 1185-1217 (1999) · Zbl 1026.91516
[15] Farrell, J.; Scotchmer, S., Partnerships, Q. J. Econ., 103, 279-297 (1988)
[16] Galeotti, A.; Goyal, S., The law of the few, Am. Econ. Rev., 100, 1468-1492 (2010)
[17] Gentzkow, M., Polarization in 2016 (2016), Toulouse Network for Information Technology Whitepaper
[18] Gentzkow, M.; Shapiro, J., Ideological segregation online and offline, Q. J. Econ., 126, 1799-1839 (2011)
[19] Gilboa, I.; Samuelson, L.; Schmeidler, D., No-betting Pareto dominance, Econometrica, 82, 1405-1442 (2014) · Zbl 1419.91479
[20] Golub, B.; Jackson, M., How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics, Q. J. Econ., 127, 1287-1338 (2012) · Zbl 1400.91465
[21] Goyal, S.; Hernández, P.; Martínez-Cánovasz, G.; Moisan, F.; Muñoz-Herrera, M.; Sánchez, A., Integration and Diversity (2017), Working Paper
[22] Guo, Y.; Shmaya, E., The interval structure of optimal disclosure, Econometrica, 87, 653-675 (2019) · Zbl 1422.91128
[23] Herskovic, B.; Ramos, J., Acquiring information through peers, Am. Econ. Rev., 110, 2128-2152 (2020)
[24] Kamenica, E.; Gentzkow, M., Bayesian persuasion, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 2590-2615 (2011)
[25] King, M. L., An Address by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr (1962), Cornell College: Cornell College Mount Vernon, Iowa
[26] Kolotilin, A., Optimal information disclosure: a linear programming approach, Theor. Econ., 13, 607-635 (2018) · Zbl 1396.91040
[27] Kolotilin, A.; Mylovanov, T.; Zapechelnyuk, A.; Li, M., Persuasion of a privately informed receiver, Econometrica, 85, 1949-1964 (2017) · Zbl 1420.91028
[28] Levy, G.; Razin, R., Correlation neglect, voting behavior, and information aggregation, Am. Econ. Rev., 105, 1634-1645 (2015)
[29] Levy, G.; Razin, R., The coevolution of segregation, polarised beliefs and discrimination: the case of private vs. state education, Am. Econ. J. Microecon., 9, 141-170 (2017)
[30] Long, E.; Chen, K.; Rhola, R., Political Storms: Tracking Hurricane Evacuation Behavior using Smartphone Data (2019), Working Paper
[31] Marmaros, D.; Sacerdote, B., How do friendships form?, Q. J. Econ., 121, 79-119 (2006) · Zbl 1179.91222
[32] Mayer, A.; Puller, S. L., The old boy (and girl) network: social network formation on university campuses, J. Public Econ., 92, 329-347 (2008)
[33] Meng, D.; Wang, S., To Learn or to Convince? Homophily in Communication (2020), Working Paper
[34] Mirkin, K.; Pycia, M., Directed Search and the Futility of Cheap Talk (2015), Working Paper
[35] Morris, S., Political correctness, J. Polit. Econ., 109, 231-265 (2001)
[36] Pycia, M., Stability and preference alignment in matching and coalition formation, Econometrica, 80, 323-362 (2012) · Zbl 1274.91332
[37] Pycia, M.; Yenmez, B., Matching with Externalities (2016), Working Paper
[38] Sasakia, H.; Toda, M., Two-sided matching problems with externalities, J. Econ. Theory, 70, 93-108 (1996) · Zbl 0859.90011
[39] Sethi, R.; Yildiz, M., Communication with unknown perspectives, Econometrica, 84, 2029-2069 (2016) · Zbl 1420.91395
[40] Shapley, L.; Shubik, M., The assignment game 1: the core, Int. J. Game Theory, 1, 111-130 (1972) · Zbl 0236.90078
[41] Sunstein, C., #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media (2018), Princeton University Press
[42] Wooders, M.; Cartwright, E.; Selten, R., Behavioral conformity in games with many players, Games Econ. Behav., 57, 347-360 (2006) · Zbl 1153.91374
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.