×

The interval structure of optimal disclosure. (English) Zbl 1422.91128

Summary: A sender persuades a receiver to accept a project by disclosing information about a payoff-relevant quality. The receiver has private information about the quality, referred to as his type. We show that the sender-optimal mechanism takes the form of nested intervals: each type accepts on an interval of qualities and a more optimistic type’s interval contains a less optimistic type’s interval. This nested-interval structure offers a simple algorithm to solve for the optimal disclosure and connects our problem to the monopoly screening problem. The mechanism is optimal even if the sender conditions the disclosure mechanism on the receiver’s reported type.

MSC:

91A28 Signaling and communication in game theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Angeletos, G.‐M., C.Hellwig, and A.Pavan (2006): “Signaling in a Global Game: Coordination and Policy Traps,” Journal of Political Economy, 114 (3), 452-484.
[2] Arieli, I., and Y.Babichenko (2018): “Private Bayesian Persuasion,” Working paper. · Zbl 1410.91324
[3] Au, P. H. (2015): “Dynamic Information Disclosure,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 46 (4), 791-823.
[4] Aumann, R. J., and M.Maschler (1995): Repeated Games With Incomplete Information. The MIT Press. · Zbl 0972.91501
[5] Azarmsa, E., and L.Cong (2018): “Persuasion in Relationship Finance,” Working paper.
[6] Bergemann, D., and S.Morris (2016a): “Bayes Correlated Equilibrium and the Comparison of Information Structures in Games,” Theoretical Economics, 11 (2), 487-522. · Zbl 1395.91007
[7] Bergemann, D., and S.Morris (2016b): “Information Design, Bayesian Persuasion, and Bayes Correlated Equilibrium,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 106 (5), 586-591.
[8] Bergemann, D., and S.Morris (2018): “Information Design: A Unified Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature (forthcoming).
[9] Bergemann, D., A.Bonatti, and A.Smolin (2018): “The Design and Price of Information,” American Economic Review, 108 (1), 1-48.
[10] Bradford, D. W., J.Turner, and J. W.Williams (2018): “Off‐Label Use of Pharmaceuticals: A Detection Controlled Estimation Approach,” Journal of Industrial Economics (forthcoming).
[11] Chen, Y. (2009): “Communication With Two‐Sided Asymmetric Information,” Working paper.
[12] Crawford, V. P., and J.Sobel (1982): “Strategic Information Transmission,” Econometrica, 50 (6), 1431-1451. · Zbl 0494.94007
[13] Diamond, D. W. (1984): “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring,” The Review of Economic Studies, 51 (3), 393-414. · Zbl 0539.90006
[14] Diamond, D. W. (1991): “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice Between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt,” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (4), 689-721.
[15] Dworczak, P., and G.Martini (2018): “The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion,” Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming).
[16] Feltovich, N., R.Harbaugh, and T.To (2002): “Too Cool for School? Signalling and Countersignalling,” RAND Journal of Economics, 33 (4), 630-649.
[17] Gentzkow, M., and E.Kamenica (2016): “A Rothschild‐Stiglitz Approach to Bayesian Persuasion,” American Economic Review, 5 (106), 597-601.
[18] Guo, Y., and E.Shmaya (2018): “Costly Miscalibration,” Working paper. · Zbl 1475.91035
[19] Guo, Y., and E.Shmaya (2019): “Supplement to ‘The Interval Structure of Optimal Disclosure’,” Econometrica Supplemental Material, 87, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15668. · Zbl 1422.91128 · doi:10.3982/ECTA15668
[20] Inostroza, N., and A.Pavan (2018): “Persuasion in Global Games With Application to Stress Testing,” Working paper.
[21] Kamenica, E., and M.Gentzkow (2011): “Bayesian Persuasion,” American Economic Review, 101 (6), 2590-2615.
[22] Kolotilin, A. (2018): “Optimal Information Disclosure: A Linear Programming Approach,” Theoretical Economics, 13 (2), 607-635. · Zbl 1396.91040
[23] Kolotilin, A., T.Mylovanov, A.Zapechelnyuk, and M.Li (2017): “Persuasion of a Privately Informed Receiver,” Econometrica, 85 (6), 1949-1964. · Zbl 1420.91028
[24] Lai, E. K. (2014): “Expert Advice for Amateurs,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 1-16.
[25] Lehrer, E., D.Rosenberg, and E.Shmaya (2010): “Signaling and Mediation in Games With Common Interests,” Games and Economic Behavior, 68 (2), 670-682. · Zbl 1200.91049
[26] Lehrer, E., D.Rosenberg, and E.Shmaya (2013): “Garbling of Signals and Outcome Equivalence,” Games and Economic Behavior, 81, 179-191. · Zbl 1282.91061
[27] Li, H., and X.Shi (2017): “Discriminatory Information Disclosure,” American Economic Review, 107 (11), 3363-3385.
[28] Mathevet, L., J.Perego, and I.Taneva (2018): “On Information Design in Games,” Working paper.
[29] Mayzlin, D., and J.Shin (2011): “Uninformative Advertising as an Invitation to Search,” Marketing Science, 30 (4), 666-685.
[30] Minaudier, C. (2018): “The Value of Confidential Policy Information: Persuasion, Transparency, and Influence,” Working paper.
[31] Mussa, M., and S.Rosen (1978): “Monopoly and Product Quality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 18 (2), 301-317. · Zbl 0403.90007
[32] Olszewski, W. (2004): “Informal Communication,” Journal of Economic Theory, 117 (2), 180-200. · Zbl 1181.91042
[33] Quigley, D., and A.Walther (2018): “Inside and Outside Information,” Working paper.
[34] Rayo, L., and I.Segal (2010): “Optimal Information Disclosure,” Journal of Political Economy, 118 (5), 949-987.
[35] Seidmann, D. (1990): “Effective Cheap Talk With Conflicting Interests,” Journal of Economic Theory, 50 (2), 445-458. · Zbl 0694.90097
[36] Taneva, I. (2018): “Information Design,” Working paper.
[37] Watson, J. (1996): “Information Transmission When the Informed Party Is Confused,” Games and Economic Behavior, 12 (1), 143-161. · Zbl 0844.90143
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.