×

Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors. (English) Zbl 1458.90394

Summary: Sustainable supply chain is recognized as a key component of corporate responsibility. Despite conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models that view decision making units (DMUs) as black boxes, two-stage DEA models take into account intermediate measures within a DMU. However, there might be stochastic data. Objective of this paper is to present a new stochastic two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable data. We present some linear models that obtain lower and upper bounds of efficiencies of stages 1 and 2. Also, we propose a linear model that calculates overall efficiency of DMUs. Meanwhile, we extend our proposed model for dealing with stochastic data in the presence of undesirable data. A case study demonstrates applicability of our approach.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abdollahi, M.; Arvan, M.; Razmi, J., An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile?, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 1, 679-690, (2015)
[2] Ahmady, N.; Azadi, M.; Sadeghi, S. A.H.; Saen, R. F., A novel fuzzy data envelopment analysis model with double frontiers for supplier selection, Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., 16, 2, 87-98, (2013)
[3] Aissaoui, N.; Haouari, M.; Hassini, E., Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: a review, Comput. Oper. Res., 34, 12, 3516-3540, (2007) · Zbl 1128.90033
[4] Aliakbarpoor, Z.; Izadikhah, M., Evaluation and ranking DMUs in the presence of both undesirable and ordinal factors in data envelopment analysis, Int. J. Autom. Comput., 9, 6, 609-615, (2012)
[5] Amindoust, A.; Ahmed, S.; Saghafinia, A.; Bahreininejad, A., Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system, Appl. Soft Comput., 12, 6, 1668-1677, (2012)
[6] Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S. S.; Goyal, S. K., A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 126, 2, 370-378, (2010)
[7] Aydın Keskin, G.; İlhan, S.; Özkan, C., The fuzzy ART algorithm: a categorization method for supplier evaluation and selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 2, 1235-1240, (2010)
[8] Azadeh, A.; Alem, S. M., A flexible deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for supply chain risk and vendor selection problem: simulation analysis, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 12, 7438-7448, (2010)
[9] Azadi, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Developing a chance-constrained free replicability hull model for supplier selection, Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag., 12, 4, 375-394, (2012)
[10] Azadi, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Developing a new chance-constrained DEA model for suppliers selection in the presence of undesirable outputs, Int. J. Oper. Res., 13, 1, 44-66, (2012) · Zbl 1362.90225
[11] Azadi, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Developing a nondiscretionary slacks-based measure model for supplier selection in the presence of stochastic data, Res. J. Bus. Manag., 6, 4, 103-120, (2012)
[12] Azadi, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Supplier selection using a new russell model in the presence of undesirable outputs and stochastic data, J. Appl. Sci., 12, 4, 336-344, (2012)
[13] Azadi, M.; Jafarian, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Mirhedayatian, S. M., A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context, Comput. Oper. Res., 54, 274-285, (2015) · Zbl 1348.90064
[14] Bai, C.; Sarkis, J., Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 124, 1, 252-264, (2010)
[15] Ballew, P. D.; Schnorbus, R. H., The impact of the auto industry on the economy, Chic. Fed Lett., 79, 1-4, (1994)
[16] Barros, C. P.; Managi, S.; Matousek, R., The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output, Omega, 40, 1, 1-8, (2012)
[17] Bowersox, D. J.C., Logistical management: the integrated supply chain process, (1996), McGraw-Hill New York
[18] Büyüközkan, G.; Çifçi, G., A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information, Comput. Ind., 62, 2, 164-174, (2011)
[19] Castelli, L.; Pesenti, R.; Ukovich, W., A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered, Annals Oper. Res., 173, 1, 207-235, (2010) · Zbl 1186.90073
[20] Çelebi, D.; Bayraktar, D., An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information, Expert Syst. Appl., 35, 4, 1698-1710, (2008)
[21] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W., Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Res. Logist. Q., 9, 181-186, (1962) · Zbl 0127.36901
[22] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2, 6, 429-444, (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[23] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Symonds, G. H., Cost horizons and certainty equivalents: an approach to stochastic programming of heating oil, Manag. Sci., 4, 235-263, (1958)
[24] Charnes, A.; Rousseau, J.; Semple, J., Sensitivity and stability of efficiency classifications in data envelopment analysis, J. Prod. Anal., 7, 5-18, (1996)
[25] Chen, Y.-J., Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain, Inf. Sci., 181, 9, 1651-1670, (2011)
[26] Chen, Y.; Cook, W. D.; Li, N.; Zhu, J., Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 196, 3, 1170-1176, (2009) · Zbl 1176.90393
[27] Chen, Y.; Liang, L.; Yang, F.; Zhu, J., Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach, Comput. Oper. Res., 33, 5, 1368-1379, (2006) · Zbl 1126.91386
[28] Chen, Y.; Liang, L.; Zhu, J., Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 193, 2, 600-604, (2009) · Zbl 1153.90502
[29] Chen, Y.; Zhu, J., Measuring information Technology’s indirect impact on firm performance, Inf. Technol. Manag., 5, 1-2, 9-22, (2004)
[30] Clift, R., Metrics for supply chain sustainability, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 5, 3-4, 240-247, (2003)
[31] Cook, W. D.; Liang, L.; Zhu, J., Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective, Omega, 38, 6, 423-430, (2010)
[32] Cooper, W.; Huang, Z.; Lelas, V.; Li, S.; Olesen, O., Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA, J. Prod. Anal., 9, 1, 53-79, (1998)
[33] Cooper, W. W.; Seiford, L. M.; Tone, K., Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers New York · Zbl 0990.90500
[34] de Boer, L.; Labro, E.; Morlacchi, P., A review of methods supporting supplier selection, Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag., 7, 2, 75-89, (2001)
[35] Desai, A.; Ratick, S. J.; Schinnar, A. P., Data envelopment analysis with stochastic variations in data, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 39, 2, 147-164, (2005)
[36] Dibachi, H.; Behzadi, M. H.; Izadikhah, M., Stochastic multiplicative DEA model for measuring the efficiency and ranking of DMUs under VRS technology, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 7, 11, 1765-1773, (2014)
[37] Dibachi, H.; Behzadi, M. H.; Izadikhah, M., Stochastic modified MAJ model for measuring the efficiency and ranking of dmus, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 8, 8, 549-555, (2015)
[38] Du, J.; Chen, Y.; Cook, W.; Liang, L.; Zhu, J., Evaluating two-stage network structures: bargaining game approach, (Cook, W. D.; Zhu, J., Data Envelopment Analysis, 208, (2014), Springer US), 165-187
[39] Du, J.; Liang, L.; Chen, Y.; Cook, W. D.; Zhu, J., A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 210, 2, 390-397, (2011) · Zbl 1210.90037
[40] Ebrahimnejad, A.; Tavana, M.; Lotfi, F. H.; Shahverdi, R.; Yousefpour, M., A three-stage data envelopment analysis model with application to banking industry, Measurement, 49, 0, 308-319, (2014)
[41] Ehsanbakhsh, H.; Izadikhah, M., Applying BSC-DEA model to performance evaluation of industrial cooperatives: an application of fuzzy inference system, Appl. Res. J., 1, 1, 9-26, (2015)
[42] Erol, I.; Sencer, S.; Sari, R., A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain, Ecol. Econ., 70, 6, 1088-1100, (2011)
[43] Falagario, M.; Sciancalepore, F.; Costantino, N.; Pietroforte, R., Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 218, 2, 523-529, (2012) · Zbl 1244.90156
[44] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach, Econ. Lett., 50, 1, 65-70, (1996) · Zbl 0900.90164
[45] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Network DEA, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 34, 1, 35-49, (2000)
[46] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: comment, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 85, 4, 1070-1074, (2003)
[47] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 157, 1, 242-245, (2004) · Zbl 1080.90527
[48] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 91, 2, 535-538, (2009)
[49] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. A.K.; Yaisawarng, S., Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach, Rev. Econ. Stat., 75, 2, 374-380, (1993)
[50] Färe, R.; Whittaker, G., An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data, J. Agric. Econ., 46, 2, 201-213, (1995)
[51] Farzipoor Saen, R., Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 51, 9-12, 1243-1250, (2010)
[52] Farzipoor Saen, R., A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors, Annals Oper. Res., 172, 1, 177-192, (2009) · Zbl 1182.91101
[53] Farzipoor Saen, R.; Zohrehbandian, M., A data envelopment analysis approach to supplier selection in volume discount environments, Int. J. Procure. Manag., 1, 4, 472-488, (2008)
[54] Gauthier, C., Measuring corporate social and environmental performance: the extended life-cycle assessment, J. Bus. Ethics, 59, 1-2, 199-206, (2005)
[55] Giannakis, M.; Papadopoulos, T., Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 171, Part 4, 455-470, (2016)
[56] Goebel, P.; Reuter, C.; Pibernik, R.; Sichtmann, C., The influence of ethical culture on supplier selection in the context of sustainable sourcing, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 140, 1, 7-17, (2012)
[57] Golany, B.; Roll, Y., An application procedure for DEA, Omega, 17, 3, 237-250, (1989)
[58] Govindan, K.; Khodaverdi, R.; Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach, J. Cleaner Prod., 47, 0, 345-354, (2013)
[59] Hadi Vencheh, A.; Kazemi Matin, R.; Tavassoli Kajani, M., Undesirable factors in efficiency measurement, Appl. Math. Comput., 163, 2, 547-552, (2005) · Zbl 1116.90379
[60] Handfield, R. B.; Nichols, E. L., Introduction to supply chain management, (1999), Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River · Zbl 0979.26001
[61] Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Jahanshahloo, G. R.; Hemati, S.; Givehchi, S., A new bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stagenetwork structures, Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng., 1, 2, 27-39, (2012)
[62] Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Nematollahi, N.; Behzadi, M. H.; Mirbolouki, M.; Moghaddas, Z., Centralized resource allocation with stochastic data, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 236, 7, 1783-1788, (2012) · Zbl 1236.90062
[63] Hsu, C.-W.; Hu, A. H., Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 2, 255-264, (2009)
[64] Humphreys, P. K.; Wong, Y. K.; Chan, F. T.S., Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 138, 1-3, 349-356, (2003)
[65] Hutchins, M. J.; Sutherland, J. W., An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions, J. Clean Prod., 16, 15, 1688-1698, (2008)
[66] Izadikhah, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., A new data envelopment analysis method for ranking decision making units: an application in industrial parks, Expert Systems, 32, 5, 598-608, (2015)
[67] Izadikhah, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Evaluating sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range directional measure in the presence of negative data, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 49, 110-126, (2016)
[68] Izadikhah, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., A new preference voting method for sustainable location planning using geographic information system and data envelopment analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 137, 1347-1367, (2016)
[69] Izadikhah, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Ahmadi, K., How to assess sustainability of suppliers in the presence of dual-role factor and volume discounts? A data envelopment analysis approach, Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res., 34, 1, 1-25, (2017) · Zbl 1375.90014
[70] Izadikhah, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Ahmadi, K., How to assess sustainability of suppliers in volume discount context? A new data envelopment analysis approach, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 51, 102-121, (2017)
[71] Jain, V.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Chandra, C., Weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive genetic algorithm based approach for incorporating value judgments, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 3, 1503-1512, (2015)
[72] Jin, J.; Zhou, D.; Zhou, P., Measuring environmental performance with stochastic environmental DEA: the case of APEC economies, Econ. Model., 38, 0, 80-86, (2014)
[73] Kao, C., Efficiency decomposition for general multi-stage systems in data envelopment analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 232, 1, 117-124, (2014) · Zbl 1305.90227
[74] Kao, C.; Hwang, S.-N., Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 185, 1, 418-429, (2008) · Zbl 1137.91497
[75] Karsak, E. E.; Dursun, M., An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 16, 6995-7004, (2014)
[76] Katsikeas, C. S.; Paparoidamis, N. G.; Katsikea, E., Supply source selection criteria: the impact of supplier performance ondistributor performance, Ind. Mark. Manag., 33, 8, 755-764, (2004)
[77] Kerstens, K.; Van de Woestyne, I., Negative data in DEA: a simple proportional distance function approach, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 62, 7, 1413-1419, (2011)
[78] Khodabakhshi, M., Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data in data envelopment analysis, Econ. Model., 26, 5, 968-973, (2009)
[79] Khodabakhshi, M., Super-efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis: an input relaxation approach, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235, 16, 4576-4588, (2011) · Zbl 1430.90408
[80] Khodabakhshi, M.; Asgharian, M., An input relaxation measure of efficiency in stochastic data envelopment analysis, Appl. Math. Model., 33, 4, 2010-2023, (2009) · Zbl 1205.90209
[81] Khodakarami, M.; Shabani, A.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Azadi, M., Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: an application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management, Measurement, 70, 0, 62-74, (2015)
[82] Kleinsorge, I. K.; Schary, P. B.; Tanner, R. D., Data envelopment analysis for monitoring customer supplier relationships, J. Account. Public Policy, 11, 4, 357-372, (1992)
[83] Korhonen, P. J.; Luptacik, M., Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154, 2, 437-446, (2004) · Zbl 1146.91327
[84] Kumar, A.; Jain, V.; Kumar, S., A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection, Omega, 42, 1, 109-123, (2014)
[85] Kuo, R. J.; Wang, Y. C.; Tien, F. C., Integration of artificial neural network and MADA methods for Green supplier selection, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 12, 1161-1170, (2010)
[86] Lee, A. H.I.; Kang, H.-Y.; Hsu, C.-F.; Hung, H.-C., A Green supplier selection model for high-tech industry, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 4, 7917-7927, (2009)
[87] Lewis, H. F.; Mallikarjun, S.; Sexton, T. R., Unoriented two-stage DEA: the case of the oscillating intermediate products, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 229, 2, 529-539, (2013)
[88] Li, H.; Yang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, C., Resource allocation models’ construction for the reduction of undesirable outputs based on DEA methods, Math. Comput. Model., 58, 5-6, 913-926, (2013)
[89] Li, L.; Li, M.; Wu, C., Production efficiency evaluation of energy companies based on the improved super-efficiency data envelopment analysis considering undesirable outputs, Math. Comput. Model., 58, 5-6, 1057-1067, (2013)
[90] Lin, C.; Madu, C. N.; Kuei, C.-h.; Tsai, H.-L.; Wang, K.-n., Developing an assessment framework for managing sustainability programs: a analytic network process approach, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 5, 2488-2501, (2015)
[91] Liu, S.-T., A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 212, 3, 606-608, (2011) · Zbl 1252.90049
[92] Liu, S.-T., Performance measurement of Taiwan financial holding companies: an additive efficiency decomposition approach, Exp. Syst. Appl., 38, 5, 5674-5679, (2011)
[93] Liu, S.-T., Fuzzy efficiency ranking in fuzzy two-stage data envelopment analysis, Optim. Lett., 8, 2, 633-652, (2014) · Zbl 1288.91047
[94] Liu, S.-T., Restricting weight flexibility in fuzzy two-stage DEA, Comput. Ind. Eng., 74, 0, 149-160, (2014)
[95] Liu, W.; Zhou, Z.; Ma, C.; Liu, D.; Shen, W., Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs, Omega, 56, 74-87, (2015)
[96] Liu, W. B.; Meng, W.; Li, X. X.; Zhang, D. Q., DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs, Annals Oper. Res., 173, 1, 177-194, (2010) · Zbl 1186.90075
[97] Ma, J., A two-stage DEA model considering shared inputs and free intermediate measures, Expert Syst. Appl., 42, 9, 4339-4347, (2015)
[98] Mafakheri, F.; Breton, M.; Ghoniem, A., Supplier selection-order allocation: a two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 132, 1, 52-57, (2011)
[99] Maghbouli, M.; Amirteimoori, A.; Kordrostami, S., Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: a DEA based approach, Measurement, 48, 109-118, (2014)
[100] Mahdiloo, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R.; Lee, K.-H., Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 168, 279-289, (2015)
[101] Martins, A. A.; Mata, T. M.; Costa, C. A.V.; Sikdar, S. K., Framework for sustainability metrics, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 10, 2962-2973, (2007)
[102] Mirhedayatian, S. M.; Azadi, M.; Farzipoor Saen, R., A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating Green supply chain management, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 147, Part B, 544-554, (2014)
[103] Mirhedayatian, S. M.; Vahdat, S. E.; Jelodar, M. J.; Saen, R. F., Welding process selection for repairing nodular cast iron engine block by integrated fuzzy data envelopment analysis and TOPSIS approaches, Mater. Des., 43, 272-282, (2013)
[104] Oliveira, R. C.; Lourenço, J. C., A multicriteria model for assigning new orders to service suppliers, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 139, 2, 390-399, (2002) · Zbl 1001.90508
[105] Pal, O.; Gupta, A. K.; Garg, R. K., Supplier selection criteria and methods in supply chains: a review, Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus. Ind. Eng., 7, 10, 2667-2773, (2013)
[106] Punniyamoorthy, M.; Mathiyalagan, P.; Parthiban, P., A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 1, 458-474, (2011)
[107] Retzlaff-Roberts, D. L.; Morey, R. C., A goal-programming method of stochastic allocative data envelopment analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 71, 3, 379-397, (1993) · Zbl 0802.90010
[108] Roostaee, R.; Izadikhah, M.; Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F.; Rostamy Malkhalifeh, M., A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method for supplier selection with VIKOR method, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl., 2, 1, 1-17, (2012)
[109] Sahoo, B. K.; Luptacik, M.; Mahlberg, B., Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: an application, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 215, 3, 750-762, (2011) · Zbl 1238.91116
[110] Scheel, H., Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 132, 2, 400-410, (2001) · Zbl 0985.90053
[111] Seiford, L. M.; Zhu, J., Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 142, 1, 16-20, (2002) · Zbl 1079.90565
[112] Sengupta, J. K., Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case, Comput. Oper. Res., 14, 2, 117-129, (1987) · Zbl 0617.90051
[113] Seuring, S.; Müller, M., From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, J. Clean. Prod., 16, 15, 1699-1710, (2008)
[114] Shabanpour, H.; Yousefi, S.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Forecasting efficiency of Green suppliers by dynamic data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 1098-1107, (2017)
[115] Shang, J.-K.; Wang, F.-C.; Hung, W.-T., A stochastic DEA study of hotel efficiency, Appl. Econ., 42, 19, 2505-2518, (2009)
[116] Sharp, J. A.; Meng, W.; Liu, W., A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ’natural’ negative outputs and inputs, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 58, 12, 1672-1677, (2007)
[117] Sridhar, K.; Jones, G., The three fundamental criticisms of the triple bottom line approach: an empirical study to link sustainability reports in companies based in the Asia-Pacific region and TBL shortcomings, Asian J. Bus. Ethics., 2, 1, 91-111, (2013)
[118] Talluri, S.; Narasimhan, R.; Nair, A., Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA approach, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 100, 2, 212-222, (2006)
[119] Tao, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X., An integrated multiple criteria decision making model applying axiomatic fuzzy set theory, Appl. Math. Model., 36, 10, 5046-5058, (2012) · Zbl 1252.90050
[120] Tavana, M.; Khalili-Damghani, K., A new two-stage Stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model, Measurement, 53, 0, 277-296, (2014)
[121] Tavana, M.; Khanjani Shiraz, R.; Hatami-Marbini, A., A new chance-constrained DEA model with birandom input and output data, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 65, 12, 1824-1839, (2014)
[122] Tavassoli, M.; Faramarzi, G. R.; Farzipoor Saen, R., Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input, J. Air Transp. Manag., 34, 146-153, (2014)
[123] Toloo, M.; Emrouznejad, A.; Moreno, P., A linear relational DEA model to evaluate two-stage processes with shared inputs, Comput. Appl. Math., 1-17, (2015)
[124] Toloo, M.; Nalchigar, S., A new DEA method for supplier selection in presence of both cardinal and ordinal data, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 12, 14726-14731, (2011)
[125] Toloo, M.; Tichý, T., Two alternative approaches for selecting performance measures in data envelopment analysis, Measurement, 65, 29-40, (2015)
[126] Vachon, S.; Klassen, R. D., Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration, Int. J. Prod. Res., 45, 2, 401-423, (2007)
[127] Wang, M.; Li, Y., Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 9, 4181-4185, (2014)
[128] Weber, C. A., A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance, Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., 1, 1, 28-39, (1996)
[129] Wu, D., Supplier selection: a hybrid model using DEA, decision tree and neural network, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 5, 9105-9112, (2009)
[130] Wu, D.; Lee, C.-G., Stochastic DEA with ordinal data applied to a multi-attribute pricing problem, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 207, 3, 1679-1688, (2010) · Zbl 1206.91037
[131] Wu, D.; Olson, D. L., Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114, 2, 646-655, (2008)
[132] Wu, D. D., A systematic stochastic efficiency analysis model and application to international supplier performance evaluation, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 9, 6257-6264, (2010)
[133] Yang, Z., A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the overall performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies, Math. Comput. Model., 43, 7-8, 910-919, (2006) · Zbl 1171.90468
[134] Yeh, W.-C.; Chuang, M.-C., Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in Green supply chain problems, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 4, 4244-4253, (2011)
[135] Yu, J.-R.; Tsai, C.-C., A decision framework for supplier rating and purchase allocation: a case in the semiconductor industry, Comput. Ind. Eng., 55, 3, 634-646, (2008)
[136] Yu, Y.; Shi, Q., Two-stage DEA model with additional input in the second stage and part of intermediate products as final output, Expert Syst. Appl., 41, 15, 6570-6574, (2014)
[137] Zeydan, M.; Çolpan, C.; Çobanoğlu, C., A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 3, 2741-2751, (2011)
[138] Zha, Y.; Liang, L., Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 205, 2, 332-338, (2010) · Zbl 1188.90137
[139] Zhou, X.; Pedrycz, W.; Kuang, Y.; Zhang, Z., Type-2 fuzzy multi-objective DEA model: an application to sustainable supplier evaluation, Appl. Soft Comput., 46, 424-440, (2016)
[140] Zhu, Q.; Dou, Y.; Sarkis, J., A portfolio-based analysis for Green supplier management using the analytical network process, Supply Chain Manag. An Int. J., 15, 306-319, (2010)
[141] Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J., Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of Green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, J. Oper. Manag., 22, 3, 265-289, (2004)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.