×

An integrated multiple criteria decision making model applying axiomatic fuzzy set theory. (English) Zbl 1252.90050

Summary: This article presents a hybrid model for the multiple criteria decision making problems. The proposed decision model consists of three parts: (i) DEA (data envelopment analysis) is used to provide the best combination on the performance parameters of original data; (ii) By the application of AFS (axiomatic fuzzy set) theory and AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method, the weight of each attribute is calculated and (iii) TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) is applied to provide the ranking order of that best combination based on the weights of attributes. In addition, we also provide the definitely semantic interpretations for the decision results by AFS theory. Specially, the model not only employs the performance parameters from raw data, but also considers the preferences from decision-makers that can make the decision results more reasonable. The proposed model is used for robot selection to verify the proposed model. Using the selection index, the evaluation of alternative robots and the selection of the most appropriate are eventually feasible. Moreover, a numerical example for supplier selection is included to illustrate the application of the model for the newly developed problems.

MSC:

90C08 Special problems of linear programming (transportation, multi-index, data envelopment analysis, etc.)

Software:

MADM
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Triantaphyllou, E., Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers London · Zbl 0980.90032
[2] Gencer, C.; Gurpinar, D., Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm, Appl. Math. Model., 31, 2475-2486 (2007) · Zbl 1149.90350
[3] Ng, W. L., An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186, 1059-1067 (2008) · Zbl 1168.90518
[4] Lin, M. C.; Wang, C. C.; Chen, M. S.; Chang, C. A., Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process, Comput. Industry, 59, 17-31 (2008)
[5] Toloo, M.; Nalchigar, S., A new integrated DEA model for finding most BCC-efficient DMU, Appl. Math. Model., 33, 597-604 (2009) · Zbl 1167.90496
[6] Alberto A, A. A.; Marco A, B. B.; Antonin, P.; Magno A, G. H., An AHP-based decision-making tool for the solution of multiproduct batch plant design problem under imprecise demand, Comput. Oper. Res., 36, 711-736 (2009) · Zbl 1157.90580
[7] Boran, E. F.; Genc, S.; Kurt, M.; Akay, D., A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 11363-11368 (2009)
[8] Yue, Z. L., A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS, Appl. Math. Model., 35, 1926-1936 (2011) · Zbl 1217.91046
[9] Mannino, M.; Hong, S. N.; Choi, I. J., Efficiency evaluation of data warehouse operations, Decision Support Syst., 44, 883-898 (2008)
[10] Liu, S. T., A fuzzy DEA/AR approach to the selection of flexible manufacturing systems, Comput. Industrial Eng., 54, 66-76 (2008)
[11] Chen, X.; Skully, M.; Brown, K., Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras:1993-2000, China Econ. Rev., 16, 229-245 (2005)
[12] Edirisinghe, N. C.P.; Zhang, X., Generalized DEA model of fundamental analysis and its application to portfolio optimization, J. Bank. Finance, 31, 3311-3335 (2007)
[13] Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 0453.90002
[14] Parkan, C.; Wu, M. L., Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection, Comput. Industrial Eng., 36, 503-523 (1999)
[15] Shyur, H. J.; Shih, H. S., A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection, Math. Comput. Model., 44, 749-761 (2006) · Zbl 1178.90196
[16] Kahraman, C.; Engin, O.; Kabak, O.; Kaya, I., Information systems outsourcing decisions using a group decision-making approach, Eng. Appl. Artificial Intelligence, 22, 832-841 (2009)
[17] Feng, C. M.; Wang, R. T., Considering the financial ratios on the performance evaluation of highway bus industry, Transport Rev., 21, 449-467 (2001)
[18] Zanakis, S. H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S., Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 107, 507-529 (1998) · Zbl 0943.90054
[19] Shim, J. P., Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Socio-Economic Planning Sci., 23, 161-167 (1989)
[20] Saaty, T. L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychol., 15, 59-62 (1977)
[21] Saaty, T. L., Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 74, 426-447 (1994) · Zbl 0925.90233
[22] Saaty, T. L., Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP (2000), RWS Publications: RWS Publications Pittsburgh
[23] Liu, X. D., The fuzzy theory based on AFS algebras and AFS structure, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 217, 459-478 (1998) · Zbl 0896.06007
[24] Liu, X. D.; Wang, W.; Chai, T. Y., The fuzzy clustering analysis based on AFS theory, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part B, 35, 1013-1027 (2005)
[25] Liu, X. D.; Chai, T. Y.; Wang, W., Approaches to the representations and logic operations for fuzzy concepts in the framework of axiomatic fuzzy set theory I, II, Info. Sci., 177, 1007-1045 (2007) · Zbl 1119.03055
[26] Liu, X. D.; Pedrycz, W., Axiomatic Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications (2008), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Heidelberg
[27] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2, 429-444 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[28] Imany, M. M.; Schlesinger, R. J., Decision models for robot selection: a comparison of ordinary least squares and linear programming methods, Decision Sci., 20, 40-53 (1989)
[29] Khouja, M., The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection, Comput. Ind., 28, 123-132 (1995)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.