×

Development of an efficient statistical volumes of fluid-Lagrangian particle tracking coupling method. (English) Zbl 1455.76057

Summary: The breakup of a liquid jet into irregular liquid structures and droplets leading to the formation of a dilute spray has been simulated numerically. To overcome the shortcomings of certain numerical methods in specific flow regimes, a combined approach has been chosen. The intact liquid core, its primary breakup and the dense spray regime are simulated using the volumes of fluid (VOF) method in combination with LES, whereas the Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT) approach in the LES context is applied to the dilute spray regime and the secondary breakup of droplets. A method has been developed to couple both simulation types on a statistical basis. This statistical coupling approach (SCA) reflects the dominating physical mechanisms of the two-phase flow in each regime to a high degree. The main benefit of the SCA is computational efficiency as compared with the more straightforward approach where one follows each structure, denoted here as the direct coupling approach. The computational benefits stem from the reduction of computational time since the VOF simulation is run only until statistical convergence and not during the whole spray development. A second benefit using the SCA is the possibility to use the stochastic parcel method in the LPT simulation whereby a large number of droplets may be handled. The coupling approach is applied to the atomization of a fuel jet in a high pressure chamber, demonstrating the gain of efficiency of the SCA as compared with direct coupling approach.

MSC:

76F65 Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence
76T10 Liquid-gas two-phase flows, bubbly flows

References:

[1] FarthA, FettesC, LeipertzA. Investigation of the diesel spray break‐up close to the nozzle at different injection conditions. The Fourth International Symposium COMODIA 98, Kyoto, Japan, 1998.
[2] FaethG, HsiangLP, WuP. Structure and breakup properties of sprays. International Journal of Multiphase Flow1995; 21:99-127. · Zbl 1134.76539
[3] NaberJD, SiebersDL. Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE International1996; 96(0034). DOI: 10.4271/960034. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/960034. · doi:10.4271/960034
[4] Martinez‐MartinezS, Sánchez‐CruzF, Riesco‐ÁvilaJM, Gallegos‐MuñozA, AcevesSM. Liquid penetration length in direct diesel fuel injection. Applied Thermal Engineering2008; 28(14-15):1756-1762.
[5] WuZ, ZhuZ, HuangZ. An experimental study on the spray structure of oxygenated fuel using laser‐based visualization and particle image velocimetry. Fuel2006; 85(10- 11):1458-1464.
[6] SiamasGA, JiangX, WrobelLC. Direct numerical simulation of the near‐field dynamics of annular gas-liquid two‐phase jets. Physics of Fluids2009; 21(042103):1-14. · Zbl 1183.76480
[7] FusterD, BagueA, BoeckT, Le MoyneL, LeboissetierA, PopinetS, RayP, ScardovelliR, ZaleskiS. Simulation of primary atomization with an octree adaptive mesh refinement and VOF method. International Journal of Multiphase Flow2009; 35:550-565.
[8] DesjardinsO, MoureauV, PitschH. An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization. Journal of Computational Physics2008; 227:8395-8416. · Zbl 1256.76051
[9] ShinjoJ, UmemuraA. Simulation of liquid jet primary breakup: dynamics of ligament and droplet formation. International Journal of Multiphase Flow2010; 36:513-532.
[10] Le ChenadecV, PitschH. A 3D unsplit forward/backward volume‐of‐fluid approach and coupling to the level set method. Journal of Computational Physics2013; 233:10-33. · Zbl 1286.76104
[11] MenardT, TanguyS, BerlemontA. Coupling level set/VOF/ghost fluid methods: validation and application to 3D simulation of the primary break‐up of a liquid jet. International Journal of Multiphase Flow2006; 33:510-524.
[12] DukowiczJ. A particle‐fluid numerical model for liquid sprays. Journal of Computational Physics1980; 35(2):229-253. · Zbl 0437.76051
[13] LeeC, ParkS. An experimental and numerical study on fuel atomization characteristics of high‐pressure diesel injection sprays. Fuel2002; 81(18):2417-2423.
[14] TomarG, FusterD, ZaleskiS, PopinetS. Multiscale simulations of primary atomization. Computers & Fluids2010; 39(10):1864-1874. · Zbl 1245.76148
[15] VallierA, RevstedtJ, NilssonH. Procedure for the break‐up of cavitation sheet. 4‐th International Meeting on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Belgrade, Serbia, 2011.
[16] HerrmannM. Detailed numerical simulations of the primary atomization of a turbulent liquid jet in crossflow. ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea and Air, GT2009, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2009.
[17] HerrmannM. A parallel Eulerian interface tracking/Lagrangian point particle multi‐scale coupling procedure. Journal of Computational Physics2010; 229:745-759. · Zbl 1253.76126
[18] BrackbillJ, KotheD, ZemachC. A continuum method for modeling surface tension. Journal of Computational Physics1992; 100:335-354. · Zbl 0775.76110
[19] LörstadD, FrancoisM, ShyyW, FuchsL. Assessment of volume of fluid and immersed boundary methods for droplet computations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids2004; 46:109-125. · Zbl 1060.76618
[20] LörstadD, FuchsL. High‐order surface tension VOF‐model for 3D bubbly flows with high density ratio. Journal of Computational Physics2004; 200:153-176. · Zbl 1288.76083
[21] LöstadD, FrancoisM, ShyyW, FuchsL. Volume of fluid ans immersed boundary investigations of a single rising droplet. AIAA, 41^stAerospace Science Meeting and Exibith2003(1282).
[22] BorisJ, GrinsteinF, OranE, KolbeR. New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dynamics Research1992; 100:199-228.
[23] PopeS. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press, 2000. · Zbl 0966.76002
[24] ElgobashiS. On predicting particle‐laden turbulent flows. Applied Scientific Research1994; 52:309-329.
[25] ReitzR. Computer Modeling of Sprays. Spray Technology Short Course. Pittsburgh: PA, 1994.
[26] SchillerL, NeumannAZ. A drag coefficient correlation. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure1933; 77:318-320.
[27] SalewskiM. LES of jets and sprays injected into crossflow. PhD Thesis, Lund University of Technology, 2006.
[28] CaraeniD, BergströmC, FuchsL. Modeling of liquid fuel injection, evaporation and mixing in a gas turbine burner using large eddy simulation. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion2000; 65:223-244. · Zbl 1055.76524
[29] AmsdenA, O’RourkeP, ButlerT. KIVA‐II: a computer program for chemically reactive flows with sprays. Technical Report (Technical Report LA‐11560‐MS), Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1989.
[30] SalewskiM, FuchsL. Consistency issues of Lagrangian particle tracking applied to a spray jet in crossflow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow2007; 33:394-410.
[31] HerbertD, SchmidtD, KnausD, PhilipsS, MagariP. Parallel VOF spray droplet identification in an unstructured grid. ILASS Americas, Orlando, Florida, May 2008, 2008.
[32] GrosshansH, SzászRZ, FuchsL. Numerical simulation of the primary breakup of a liquid fuel jet. International Conference on Jets, Wakes and Separated Flows, ICJWSF‐2010, September 27-30, 2010, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 2010.
[33] BraccoF. Modeling of engine sprays. SAE Technical Paper, 1985.
[34] GrosshansH, SzászRZ, FuchsL. Sensitivity analysis of spray dispersion and mixing for varying fuel properties. International Conference on Multiphase Flow, ICMF 2010, Tampa, FL, May 30 - June 4, 2010 7^th, Tampa, Florida, USA, 2010.
[35] EatonJ. Two‐way coupled turbulence simulations of gas‐particle flows using point‐particle tracking. International Journal of Multiphase Flow2009; 35(9):792-800.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.