×

Optimal reinsurance-investment strategy for a dynamic contagion claim model. (English) Zbl 1446.91056

Summary: We study the optimal reinsurance-investment problem for the compound dynamic contagion process introduced by A. Dassios and H. Zhao [Adv. Appl. Probab. 43, No. 3, 814–846 (2011; Zbl 1230.60089)]. This model allows for self-exciting and externally-exciting clustering effect for the claim arrivals, and includes the well-known Cox process with shot noise intensity and the Hawkes process as special cases. For tractability, we assume that the insurer’s risk preference is the time-consistent mean-variance criterion. By utilizing the dynamic programming and extended HJB equation approach, a closed-form expression is obtained for the equilibrium reinsurance-investment strategy. An excess-of-loss reinsurance type is shown to be optimal even in the presence of self-exciting and externally-exciting contagion claims, and the strategy depends on both the claim size and claim arrivals assumptions. Further, we show that the self-exciting effect is of a more dangerous nature than the externally-exciting effect as the former requires more risk management controls than the latter. In addition, we find that the reinsurance strategy does not always become more conservative (i.e., transferring more risk to the reinsurer) when the claim arrivals are contagious. Indeed, the insurer can be better off retaining more risk if the claim severity is relatively light-tailed.

MSC:

91G05 Actuarial mathematics
91G45 Financial networks (including contagion, systemic risk, regulation)

Citations:

Zbl 1230.60089
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Albrecher, Hansjörg; Asmussen, Søren, Ruin probabilities and aggregate claims distributions for shot noise Cox processes, Scand. Actuar. J., 2006, 2, 86-110 (2006) · Zbl 1129.91022
[2] Bacry, Emmanuel; Mastromatteo, Iacopo; Muzy, Jean-François, Hawkes processes in finance, Market Microstruct. Liq., 1, 01, 1550005 (2015)
[3] Bai, Lihua; Guo, Junyi, Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment with multiple risky assets and no-shorting constraint, Insurance Math. Econom., 42, 3, 968-975 (2008) · Zbl 1147.93046
[4] Basak, Suleyman; Chabakauri, Georgy, Dynamic mean-variance asset allocation, Rev. Financ. Stud., 23, 8, 2970-3016 (2010)
[5] Beard, Robert, Risk Theory: The Stochastic Basis of Insurance, Vol. 20 (2013), Springer Science & Business Media
[6] Björk, Tomas; Grandell, Jan, Exponential inequalities for ruin probabilities in the Cox case, Scand. Actuar. J., 1988, 1-3, 77-111 (1988) · Zbl 0668.62072
[7] Björk, Tomas; Khapko, Mariana; Murgoci, Agatha, On time-inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time, Finance Stoch., 21, 2, 331-360 (2017) · Zbl 1360.49013
[8] Cox, David R., Some statistical methods connected with series of events, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 129-164 (1955) · Zbl 0067.37403
[9] Dassios, Angelos; Zhao, Hongbiao, A dynamic contagion process, Adv. Appl. Probab., 43, 3, 814-846 (2011) · Zbl 1230.60089
[10] Dassios, Angelos; Zhao, Hongbiao, Ruin by dynamic contagion claims, Insurance Math. Econom., 51, 1, 93-106 (2012) · Zbl 1284.91224
[11] Delong, Łukasz; Gerrard, Russell, Mean-variance portfolio selection for a non-life insurance company, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 66, 2, 339-367 (2007) · Zbl 1148.60040
[12] Embrechts, Paul; Schmidli, Hanspeter; Grandell, Jan, Finite-time Lundberg inequalities in the Cox case, Scand. Actuar. J., 1993, 1, 17-41 (1993) · Zbl 0785.62094
[13] Hale, Jack K.; Koçak, Hüseyin, Dynamics and Bifurcations, Vol. 3 (2012), Springer Science & Business Media · Zbl 0745.58002
[14] Hawkes, Alan G., Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes, Biometrika, 58, 1, 83-90 (1971) · Zbl 0219.60029
[15] Hawkes, Alan G., Hawkes processes and their applications to finance: a review, Quant. Finance, 18, 2, 193-198 (2018)
[16] Kirchner, Matthias, An estimation procedure for the Hawkes process, Quant. Finance, 17, 4, 571-595 (2017) · Zbl 1406.62118
[17] Landriault, David; Li, Bin; Li, Danping; Young, Virginia R., Equilibrium strategies for the mean-variance investment problem over a random horizon, SIAM J. Financial Math., 9, 3, 1046-1073 (2018) · Zbl 1416.91354
[18] Li, Bin; Li, Danping; Xiong, Dewen, Alpha-robust mean-variance reinsurance-investment strategy, J. Econom. Dynam. Control, 70, 101-123 (2016) · Zbl 1401.91521
[19] Li, Danping; Li, Dongchen; Young, Virginia R., Optimality of excess-loss reinsurance under a mean-variance criterion, Insurance Math. Econom., 75, 82-89 (2017) · Zbl 1394.91222
[20] Lim, Kar Wai, Lee, Young, Hanlen, Leif, Zhao, Hongbiao, 2016. Simulation and calibration of a fully Bayesian marked multidimensional Hawkes process with dissimilar decays. In: Asian Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 238-253.
[21] Liu, Chi Sang; Yang, Hailiang, Optimal investment for an insurer to minimize its probability of ruin, N. Am. Actuar. J., 8, 2, 11-31 (2004) · Zbl 1085.60511
[22] Promislow, S. David; Young, Virginia R., Minimizing the probability of ruin when claims follow Brownian motion with drift, N. Am. Actuar. J., 9, 3, 109 (2005) · Zbl 1141.91543
[23] Schmidli, Hanspeter, Lundberg inequalities for a Cox model with a piecewise constant intensity, J. Appl. Probab., 33, 1, 196-210 (1996) · Zbl 0845.60066
[24] Schmidli, Hanspeter, On minimizing the ruin probability by investment and reinsurance, Ann. Appl. Probab., 12, 3, 890-907 (2002) · Zbl 1021.60061
[25] Seal, Hilary L., The Poisson process: its failure in risk theory, Insurance Math. Econom., 2, 4, 287-288 (1983)
[26] Stabile, Gabriele; Torrisi, Giovanni Luca, Risk processes with non-stationary Hawkes claims arrivals, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 12, 3, 415-429 (2010) · Zbl 1231.91239
[27] Strotz, Robert Henry, Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, Rev. Econom. Stud., 23, 3, 165-180 (1955)
[28] Terrell, William J., Stability and Stabilization: An Introduction (2009), Princeton University Press · Zbl 1170.34001
[29] Zeng, Yan; Li, Zhongfei, Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance policies for mean-variance insurers, Insurance Math. Econom., 49, 1, 145-154 (2011) · Zbl 1218.91167
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.