×

Modeling and robust adaptive iterative learning control of a vehicle-based flexible manipulator with uncertainties. (English) Zbl 1418.93135

Summary: In this brief, this paper deals with a robust adaptive iterative learning control (ILC) problem for a flexible manipulator attached to a moving vehicle with uncertainties. To begin with, considering the infinite dimensionality of the flexible distributed parameter system, a coupled ordinary differential equation and partial differential equation model is established without any discretization. Then, it is followed by a presentation of an adaptive ILC strategy, which can drive the vehicle and joint to the desired positions based on a proportional-derivative feedback structure with unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances. The deformation of the flexible manipulator can also be suppressed simultaneously under the proposed control laws. By using Lyapunov’s direct method, the stability of the closed-loop system is demonstrated. The simulation results are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control laws.

MSC:

93C40 Adaptive control/observation systems
93B35 Sensitivity (robustness)
93C85 Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory
93C41 Control/observation systems with incomplete information
93C15 Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations
93C20 Control/observation systems governed by partial differential equations
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] SunC, HeW, HongJ. Neural network control of a flexible robotic manipulator using the lumped spring‐mass model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2017;47(8):1863‐1874.
[2] KarimiHR, YazdanpanahMJ. A new modeling approach to single‐link flexible manipulator using singular perturbation method. Electr Eng. 2006;88(5):375‐382.
[3] SubudhiB, MorrisAS. Singular perturbation based neuro‐H_∞ control scheme for a manipulator with flexible links and joints. Robotica. 2006;24:151‐161.
[4] LiY, TongS, LiT. Adaptive fuzzy output feedback control for a single‐link flexible robot manipulator driven DC motor via backstepping. Nonlinear Anal: Real World Appl. 2013;14(1):483‐494. · Zbl 1254.93100
[5] LiuZ, LiuJ, HeW. Dynamic modeling and vibration control for a nonlinear three‐dimensional flexible manipulator. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2018;28(13):3927‐3945. · Zbl 1397.93145
[6] ShanJ, LiuHT, SunD. Modified input shaping for a rotating single‐link flexible manipulator. J Sound Vib. 2005;285(1‐2):187‐207.
[7] XuB. Composite learning control of flexible‐link manipulator using NN and DOB. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern: Syst. 2017;48(11):1979‐1985. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2017.2700433 · doi:10.1109/TSMC.2017.2700433
[8] LiuZ, LiuJ, HeW. Adaptive boundary control of a flexible manipulator with input saturation. Int J Control. 2016;89(6):1191‐1202. · Zbl 1338.93193
[9] BakhtiM, IdrissiBB. Active vibration control of a flexible manipulator using model predictive control and Kalman optimal filtering. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 2013;5(1):165‐177.
[10] ChangW, TongS, LiY. Adaptive fuzzy backstepping output constraint control of flexible manipulator with actuator saturation. Neural Comput Appl. 2017;28(1):1165‐1175.
[11] UmetaniY, YoshidaK. Resolved motion rate control of space manipulators with generalized Jacobian matrix. IEEE Trans Robotics Autom. 1989;5(3):303‐314.
[12] WangX, MillsJK. Dynamic modeling of a flexible‐link planar parallel platform using a substructuring approach. Mech Mach Theory. 2006;41(6):671‐687. · Zbl 1159.70336
[13] NenchevD. A controller for a redundant free‐flying space robot with spacecraft attitude/manipulator motion coordination. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 1993; Yokohama, Japan.
[14] ParlaktunaO, OzkanM. Adaptive control of free‐floating space manipulators. Paper presented at: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics; 2000; Nashville, TN.
[15] JovanovićMM, SimonovićAM, ZorićND, et al. Experimental investigation of spillover effect in system of active vibration control. FME Trans. 2014;42:329‐334.
[16] HagenG, MezidI. Control spillover in dissipative evolution equations. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference; 2000; Chicago, IL.
[17] HeW, SunC. Boundary feedback stabilisation of a flexible robotic manipulator with constraint. Int J Control. 2016;89(3):635‐651. · Zbl 1332.93299
[18] HeX, HeW, QinH, SunC. Boundary vibration control for a flexible Timoshenko robotic manipulator. IET Control Theory Appl. 2018;12(7):875‐882.
[19] HeW, HeX, ZouM, LiH. PDE model based boundary control design for a flexible robotic manipulator with input backlash. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2018;27(2):790‐797. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2017.2780055 · doi:10.1109/TCST.2017.2780055
[20] LiuZ, LiuJ, HeW. Robust adaptive fault tolerant control for a linear cascaded ODE‐beam systems. Automatica. 2018;98:42‐50. · Zbl 1406.93094
[21] HeW, MengT, HeX, GeSS. Unified iterative learning control for flexible structures with input constraints. Automatica. 2018;86:326‐336. · Zbl 1406.93072
[22] AmannN, OwensDH, RogersE. Iterative learning control for discrete‐time systems with exponential rate of convergence. Control Theory Appl. 1996;143(2):217‐224. · Zbl 0875.93211
[23] SeelT, SchauerT, RaischJ. Monotonic convergence of iterative learning control systems with variable pass length. Int J Control. 2017;90(3):393‐406. · Zbl 1359.93154
[24] XuJX, ViswanathanB. Adaptive robust iterative learning control with dead zone scheme. Automatica. 2000;36(1):91‐99. · Zbl 0939.93018
[25] BuX, CuiL, HouZ, QianW. Formation control for a class of nonlinear multiagent systems using model‐free adaptive iterative learning. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2018;28:1402‐1412. · Zbl 1390.93019
[26] ZundertJV, BolderJ, OomenT. Optimality and flexibility in iterative learning control for varying tasks. Automatica. 2016;67:295‐302. · Zbl 1335.93037
[27] TayebiA. Adaptive iterative learning control for robot manipulators. Automatica. 2004;40(7):1195‐1203. · Zbl 1051.93038
[28] JiaB, LiuS, LiuY. Visual trajectory tracking of industrial manipulator with iterative learning control. Ind Robot. 2015;42(1):54‐63.
[29] NgoT, WangY, MaiTL, GeJ, NguyenMH, WeiSN. An adaptive iterative learning control for robot manipulator in task space. Int J Comput Commun Control. 2012;7(3):518‐529.
[30] WangD. A simple iterative learning controller with flexible joints. Automatica. 1995;31(9):1341‐1344. · Zbl 0831.93046
[31] CavinRKIII, DustoAR. Hamilton’s principle—finite element methods and flexible body dynamics. AIAA J. 1977;15(12):1684‐1690. · Zbl 0371.73041
[32] HeW, GeSS. Cooperative control of a nonuniform gantry crane with constrained tension. Automatica. 2016;66(4):146‐154. · Zbl 1335.93012
[33] RahnCD. Mechatronic Control of Distributed Noise and Vibration. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2001. · Zbl 0978.70001
[34] PolycarpouMM, IoannouPA. A robust adaptive nonlinear control design. Paper presented at: American Control Conference; 1993; San Francisco, CA.
[35] DoschJJ, InmanDJ, GarciaE. A self‐sensing piezoelectric actuator for collocated control. J Intell Material Syst Struct. 1992;3(1):166‐185.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.