×

Adaptive synchronization control of networked robot systems without velocity measurements. (English) Zbl 1398.93256

Summary: This paper addresses the adaptive synchronization control problem of networked robot systems characterized by the Lagrangian function, where exact dynamic models are unknown and velocity measurements are unavailable. A class of distributed observers, comprised of multiple dynamic variables and static variables, are established based on no a-priori restriction on the boundness of the observer states. The observer is compatible for different control schemes with or without structure uncertainties. Using the estimated states given by the observer, adaptive distributed control input is developed, and then, closed-loop dynamic models for filtered vectors are established. It is proven that our proposed control scheme permits global exact state estimation and global asymptotic synchronization while compensating for structure uncertainties. Simulations are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the results.

MSC:

93C85 Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory
93A14 Decentralized systems
93C40 Adaptive control/observation systems
93C15 Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations
93B07 Observability
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] XiaoF, WangL, ChenJ, GaoY. Finite‐time formation control for multi‐agent systems. Automatica. 2009;45(11):2605‐2611. · Zbl 1180.93006
[2] MengD, JiaY, DuJ, ZhangJ, LiW. Formation learning algorithms for mobile agents subject to 2‐D dynamically changing topologies. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2013 American Control Conference; 2013; Washington, DC.
[3] QinJ, YuC, GaoH. Coordination for linear multiagent systems with dynamic interaction topology in the leader‐following framework. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2014;61(5):2412‐2422.
[4] LinJ, MorseA, AndersonB. The multi‐agent rendezvous problem. Paper presented at: Procceedings of the 42nd Conference on Decision and Control; 2003; Maui, HI.
[5] ZhaoD, LiS, GaoF, ZhuQ. Robust adaptive terminal sliding mode‐based synchronised position control for multiple motion axes systems. IET Control Theory Appl. 2009;3(1):136‐150.
[6] ZhaoD, ZhuQ. Position synchronised control of multiple robotic manipulators based on integral sliding mode. Int J Syst Sci. 2014;45(3):556‐570. · Zbl 1307.93108
[7] ChongCY, KumarSP. Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proc IEEE. 2003;91(8):1247‐1256.
[8] LesserV, OrtizC, TambeM. Distributed Sensor Networks: A Multiagent Perspective. New York, NY: Springer; 2003. · Zbl 1033.68009
[9] LuoRC, ChenO. Mobile sensor node deployment and asynchronous power management for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2012;59(5):2377‐2385.
[10] AhmedS, NahrstedtK, WangG. Topology‐aware optimal task allocation for mission critical environment‐A decentralized approach. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2011 Military Communications Conference; 2011; Baltimore, MD.
[11] LeeDH, ZaheerSA, KimJH. Ad hoc network‐based task allocation with resource‐aware cost generation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2014;61(12):6871‐6881.
[12] LiS, DuH, LinX. Finite‐time consensus algorithm for multi‐agent systems with double‐integrator dynamics. Automatica. 2011;47(8):1706‐1712. · Zbl 1226.93014
[13] ZhangB, JiaY. Algebraic criteria for consensus problems of general linear multi‐agent systems with switching topology. J Franklin Inst. 2015;352(4):1521‐1540. · Zbl 1395.93029
[14] ZhangH, LewisFL, QuZ. Lyapunov, adaptive, and optimal design techniques for cooperative systems on directed communication graphs. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2012;59(7):3026‐3041.
[15] WangY, SongY, LewisFL. Robust adaptive fault‐tolerant control of multiagent systems with uncertain nonidentical dynamics and undetectable actuation failures. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2015;62(6):3978‐3988.
[16] ChungS, AhsunU, SlotineJE. Application of synchronization to formation flying spacecraft: Lagrangian approach. J Guid Control Dyn. 2009;32(2):512‐526.
[17] DuH, LiS. Attitude synchronization control for a group of flexible spacecraft. Automatica. 2014;50(2):646‐651. · Zbl 1364.93016
[18] LiS, DuH, ShiP. Distributed attitude control for multiple spacecraft with communication delays. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2014;50(3):1765‐1773.
[19] ZhangB, JiaY, DuJ, ZhangJ. Finite‐time synchronous control for multiple manipulators with sensor saturations and a constant reference. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2014;22(3):1159‐1165.
[20] ZhangB, JiaY, MatsunoF. Finite‐time observers for multi‐agent systems without velocity measurements and with input saturations. Syst Control Lett. 2014;68:86‐94. · Zbl 1288.93030
[21] ZhangF, DawsonDM, deQueirozMS, DixonWE. Global adaptive output feedback tracking control of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2000;45(6):1203‐1208. · Zbl 0972.93045
[22] DixonWE. Adaptive regulation of amplitude limited robot manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2007;52(3):488‐493. · Zbl 1366.93402
[23] YangQ, ZhouF, ChenJ, LiX, FangH. Distributed tracking for multiple Lagrangian systems using only position measurements. Int Fed Autom Control. 2014;57(3):287‐292.
[24] Olfati‐SaberR, MurrayR. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time‐delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2004;49(9):1520‐1533. · Zbl 1365.93301
[25] NamvarM. A class of globally convergent velocity observers for robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2009;54(8):1956‐1961. · Zbl 1367.93096
[26] MeiJ, RenW, ChenJ, MaG. Distributed adaptive cooridination for multiple Lagrangian systems under a directed graph without using neighbors’ velocity information. Automatica. 2013;49(6):1723‐1731. · Zbl 1360.93047
[27] KhalilHK. Nonlinear Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice‐hall; 2002. · Zbl 1003.34002
[28] HuangC, LianK, ChiuC, FuL. Smooth sliding mode control for constrained manipulator with joint flexibility. IFAC Proc Vol. 2005;38(1):91‐96.
[29] Nyong‐BasseyBE, AkinloyeB. Comparative study of optimised artificial intelligence based first order sliding mode controllers for position control of a DC motor actuator. J Autom Mob Robotics Intell Syst. 2016;10(3):58‐71.
[30] LinZ, SaberiA, StoorvogelAA. Semiglobal stabilization of linear discrete‐time systems subject to input saturation via linear feedback‐an ARE‐based approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1996;41(8):1203‐1207. · Zbl 0873.93071
[31] SuY, MullerPC, ZhengC. Global asymptotic saturated PID control for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2000;18(6):1280‐1288.
[32] ÅströmKJ, WittenmarkB. Computer‐Controlled Systems: Theory and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.
[33] Carrasco‐RoblesM, SerranoL. A novel CMOS current mode fully differential tanh(x) implementation. Paper presented at: IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems; 2008; Seattle, WA.
[34] Carrasco‐RoblesM, SerranoL. Accurate differential tanh (nx) implementation. Int J Circuit Theory Appl. 2009;37(5):613‐629. · Zbl 1191.94136
[35] ZhaoD, LiS, ZhuQ. Adaptive synchronized tracking control for multiple robotic manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. Int J Syst Sci. 2016;47(4):791‐804. · Zbl 1333.93180
[36] ZhaoD, NiW, ZhuQ. A framework of neural networks based consensus control for multiple robotic manipulators. Neurocomputing. 2014;140:8‐18.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.