×

Values and evidence: how models make a difference. (English) Zbl 1398.62013

Summary: We call attention to an underappreciated way in which non-epistemic values influence evidence evaluation in science. Our argument draws upon some well-known features of scientific modeling. We show that, when scientific models stand in for background knowledge in Bayesian and other probabilistic methods for evidence evaluation, conclusions can be influenced by the non-epistemic values that shaped the setting of priorities in model development. Moreover, it is often infeasible to correct for this influence. We further suggest that, while this value influence is not particularly prone to the problem of wishful thinking, it could have problematic non-epistemic consequences in some cases.

MSC:

62A01 Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics

References:

[1] Betz, G, In defense of the value-free ideal, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3, 207-220, (2013) · doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x
[2] Betz, G, Are climate models credible worlds? prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5, 191-215, (2015) · doi:10.1007/s13194-015-0108-y
[3] Biddle, J; Winsberg, E; Magnus, PD (ed.); Busch, J (ed.), Value judgments and the estimation of uncertainty in climate modeling, 172-197, (2009), New York
[4] Cohen, L. J. (1992). An essay on belief and acceptance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[5] Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., et al. (2013). Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. In T. F. Stocker et al. (Eds.), Climate change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Melo-Martin, I; Intemann, K, The risk of using inductive risk to challenge the value-free ideal, Philosophy of Science, 83, 500-520, (2016) · doi:10.1086/687259
[7] Douglas, H, Inductive risk and values in science, Philosophy of Science, 67, 559-579, (2000) · doi:10.1086/392855
[8] Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. · doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78
[9] Elliott, K; McKaughan, D, Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science, Philosophy of Science, 81, 1-21, (2014) · doi:10.1086/674345
[10] Giorgi, F; Mearns, LO, Probability of regional climate change based on the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method, Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 1629, (2003) · doi:10.1029/2003GL017130
[11] Gneiting, T; Katzfuss, M, Probabilistic forecasting, Annual Review of Statistics and its Application, 1, 125-151, (2014) · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-062713-085831
[12] Harris, G. R., Sexton, D. M. H., Booth, B. B. B., et al. (2013). Probabilistic projections of transient climate change. Climate Dynamics, 40(11-12), 2937-2972. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1647-y.
[13] Harsanyi, JC, Acceptance of empirical statements: A Bayesian theory without cognitive utilities, Theory and Decision, 18, 1-30, (1985) · doi:10.1007/BF00134075
[14] Intemann, K, Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5, 217-232, (2015) · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0105-6
[15] Jeffrey, R, Valuation and acceptance of scientific hypotheses, Philosophy of Science, 22, 237-246, (1956) · doi:10.1086/287489
[16] Krzysztofowicz, R, Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model, Water Resources Research, 35, 2739-2750, (1999) · doi:10.1029/1999WR900099
[17] Krzysztofowicz, R, Bayesian system for probabilistic river stage forecasting, Journal of Hydrology, 268, 16-40, (2002) · doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00106-3
[18] Lenhard, J; Winsberg, E, Holism, entrenchment and the future of climate model pluralism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 41, 253-262, (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.07.001
[19] Mastrandrea, M. D., Field, C. B., Stocker, T. F., et al. (2010). Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at http://ww1w.ipcc.ch.
[20] Mauritsen, T., Stevens, B., Roeckner, E., et al. (2012). Tuning the climate of a global model. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 4, M00A01. doi:10.1029/2012MS000154.
[21] Morgan, MG, Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy, PNAS, 111, 7176-7184, (2014) · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319946111
[22] Murphy, J. M., Sexton, D. M. H., Jenkins, G. J., et al. (2009). UK climate projections science report: Climate change projections. Exeter: Met Office Hadley Centre.
[23] Parker, W, Ensemble modeling, uncertainty and robust predictions, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 213-223, (2013)
[24] Parker, W, Values and uncertainties in climate prediction, revisited, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46, 24-30, (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.003
[25] Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agntology: the making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[26] Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., et al. (2005). Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Monthly Weather Review, 133, 1155-1174.
[27] Rudner, R, The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments, Philosophy of Science, 20, 1-6, (1953) · doi:10.1086/287231
[28] Steel, D, Acceptance, values and probability, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 53, 81-88, (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.05.010
[29] Steele, K, The scientist qua policy advisor makes value judgments, Philosophy of Science, 79, 893-904, (2012) · doi:10.1086/667842
[30] Winsberg, E, Values and uncertainties in the predictions of global climate models, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 22, 111-137, (2012) · doi:10.1353/ken.2012.0008
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.