×

Extended omega ratio optimization for risk-averse investors. (English) Zbl 1367.91202

Summary: The omega ratio, a performance measure, is the ratio of the expected upside deviation of return to the expected downside deviation of return from a predetermined threshold described by an investor. It has been exhibited that the omega ratio optimization is equivalent to a linear program under a mild condition and thus easily tractable. But the omega ratio optimization fails to hedge against many other risks involved in portfolio return that may adversely affect the interests of a risk-averse investor. On the other hand, there are widely accepted mean-risk models for portfolio selection that seek to maximize mean return and minimize the associated risk but in general fail to maximize the relative performance ratio around the threshold return. In this paper, we aim to propose a model called ‘extended omega ratio optimization’ that combines the features of the omega ratio optimization model and mean-risk models. The proposed model introduces constraint on a general risk function in the omega ratio optimization model in such a way that the resultant model remains linear and thus tractable. Our empirical experience with real data from S&P BSE sensex index shows that the optimal portfolios from the extended omega ratio optimization model(s) improved over the optimal portfolios from the omega ratio optimization in having less associated risk and over the optimal portfolios from the corresponding mean-risk model(s) in having a high value omega ratio.

MSC:

91G70 Statistical methods; risk measures
91G10 Portfolio theory
90C90 Applications of mathematical programming
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D., 1999. Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance9, 203-228. · Zbl 0980.91042
[2] Avouyi‐Dovi, S., Morin, S., Neto, D., 2004. Optimal asset allocation with omega function. Technical Report, Banque de France.
[3] Charnes, A., Cooper, W., 1962. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly9, 181-186. · Zbl 0127.36901
[4] Dembo, R., Mausser, H., 2000. The put/call efficient frontier. Algo Research Quarterly3, 13-26.
[5] Fishburn, P.C., 1977. Mean‐risk analysis with risk associated with below‐target returns. American Economic Review59, 116-126.
[6] Geoffrion, A.M., Marsten, R.E., 1972. Integer programming algorithm: a framework and state of the art survey. Management Science18, 465-491. · Zbl 0238.90043
[7] Gilli, M., Kellezi, E., Hysi, H., 2006. A data‐driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization. Journal of Risk8, 3, 1-19.
[8] Horst, R., Tuy, H., 1996. Global Optimization: Deterministic Approaches (3rd edn). Springer‐Verlag, Berlin. · Zbl 0867.90105
[9] Huyer, W., Neumaier, A., 1999. MCS: global optimization by multilevel coordinate search. Journal of Global Optimization14, 331-355. · Zbl 0956.90045
[10] Kane, S.J., Bartholomew‐Biggs, M.C., Cross, M., Dewar, M., 2009. Optimizing omega. Journal of Global Optimization45, 153-167. · Zbl 1180.90247
[11] Kapsos, M., Zymler, S., Christofides, N., Rustem, B., 2014. Optimizing the omega ratio using linear programming. Journal of Operational Risk9, 4, 49-57.
[12] Kirilyuk, V.S., 2013. Maximizing the omega ratio by two linear programming problems. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis49, 699-705. · Zbl 1306.90091
[13] Konno H., Shirakawa, H., Yamazaki, H., 1993. A mean‐absolute deviation‐skewness portfolio optimisation model. Annals of Operations Research45, 205-220. · Zbl 0785.90014
[14] Konno, H., Yamazaki, H., 1991. Mean‐absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market. Management Science37, 519-531.
[15] Markowitz, H.M., 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance7, 77-91.
[16] Mausser, H., Saunders, D., Seco, L., 2006. Optimizing omega. Risk Magazine11, 88-92.
[17] Michalowski, W., Ogryczak, W., 2001. Extending the MAD portfolio optimization model to incorporate downside risk aversion. Naval Research Logistics48, 185-200. · Zbl 1130.91342
[18] Ogryczak, W., Ruszczynski, A., 1999. From stochastic dominance to mean‐risk models: semideviations as risk measures. European Journal of Operational Research116, 33-50. · Zbl 1007.91513
[19] Reeves, C.R. (ed.) (ed.), 1993, Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. · Zbl 0942.90500
[20] Rockafeller, R.T., Uryasev, S., 2000. Optimization of conditional value‐at‐risk. Journal of Risk2, 21-42.
[21] Roman, D., Darby‐Dowman, K., Mitra, G., 2007. Mean‐risk models using two risk measures: a multi‐objective approach. Quantitative Finance7, 443-458. · Zbl 1190.91139
[22] Roy, A.D., 1952. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica20, 431-449. · Zbl 0047.38805
[23] Shadwick, W., Keating, C., 2002. A universal performance measure. Journal of Performance Measurement6, 3, 59-84.
[24] Sharma, A., Mehra, A., 2013. Portfolio selection with a minimax measure in safety constraint. Optimization62, 1473-1500. · Zbl 1282.91309
[25] Sharpe, W.F., 1994. The Sharpe ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management21, 1, 49-58.
[26] Wang, J., 2000. Mean‐variance‐VaR based portfolio optimisation. Mimeo, Valdosta State University.
[27] Working Group on Global Derivatives. 1993. Derivatives: Practices and Principles. Group of Thirty, Washington, DC.
[28] Young, M.R., 1998. A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution. Management Science44, 673-683. · Zbl 0999.91043
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.