×

Upper bounds in the Ohtsuki-Riley-Sakuma partial order on 2-Bridge knots. (English) Zbl 1246.57014

Work of T. Ohtsuki, R. Riley and M. Sakuma [in: M. Boileau (ed.) et al., The Zieschang Gedenkschrift. Coventry: Geometry & Topology Publications. Geometry and Topology Monographs 14, 417–450 (2008; Zbl 1146.57011)] that relates to the existence of certain epimorphisms between the complements of 2-bridge links can be used to define a partial order on 2-bridge knots. A refinement of this partial order is given by that of D. Silver and W. Whitten [J. Knot Theory Ramifications 15, 153–166 (2006; Zbl 1096.57007)].
A key concept in defining the Ohtsuki-Riley-Sakuma partial order, and in the paper under review, is a particular normalisation of the continued fraction expansion of a rational number defining a given 2-bridge knot. The rational number is expressed as an expanded even vector. That is, it is expressed as a finite sequence from \(\{2,0,-2\}\), such that whenever a 0 occurs the components on either side are either both 2 or both \(-2\). The partial order is given by comparing the expanded even vectors of the knots in question.
This paper considers the question of finding an upper bound on a set of 2-bridge knots. Any such set with an upper bound is finite. It is shown that a finite set of 2-bridge knots has an upper bound if and only if every two-element subset has an upper bound. A necessary and sufficient condition is given for the existence of an upper bound for two incomparable 2-bridge knots. The proof is constructive.
In addition, given two 2-bridge knots, a graphical interpretation is given of an expanded even vector representing an upper bound on the knots that is of minimal length among all such vectors.

MSC:

57M25 Knots and links in the \(3\)-sphere (MSC2010)

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1090/S0894-0347-2011-00711-X · Zbl 1237.57002 · doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2011-00711-X
[2] DOI: 10.4310/CAG.2010.v18.n1.a5 · Zbl 1211.57004 · doi:10.4310/CAG.2010.v18.n1.a5
[3] Burde G., de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 5, in: Knots (2003)
[4] DOI: 10.1093/qjmath/52.4.447 · Zbl 1003.57018 · doi:10.1093/qjmath/52.4.447
[5] DOI: 10.1142/S0218216511008747 · Zbl 1218.57004 · doi:10.1142/S0218216511008747
[6] DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.1221 · Zbl 1205.57011 · doi:10.2140/agt.2010.10.1221
[7] DOI: 10.1007/s10114-008-6269-2 · Zbl 1153.57005 · doi:10.1007/s10114-008-6269-2
[8] DOI: 10.2140/gtm.2008.13.307 · Zbl 1137.57006 · doi:10.2140/gtm.2008.13.307
[9] DOI: 10.2140/gtm.2008.14.417 · Zbl 1146.57011 · doi:10.2140/gtm.2008.14.417
[10] DOI: 10.1142/S0218216506004373 · Zbl 1096.57007 · doi:10.1142/S0218216506004373
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.