×

A new conditioning dual-rate observer-based tracker for hybrid chaotic systems with saturating actuators. (English) Zbl 1065.93016

The authors propose a new conditioning dual-rate observer-based tracker for hybrid chaotic systems with saturating actuators. First, a chaotic system is translated into an appropriate linearization model by using the optimal linearization method. Then, a digitally redesigned observer with a high-gain property is developed to accurately estimate the states of the linearization model.
The design of the tracker is based on advanced digital redesign techniques equipped with a predictive feature and using a slow-rate sampling period for the unconstrained chaotic system. Also, the authors add an inner state compensator based on the fast-rate digital redesign technique to deal with the wind-up phenomenon.
The aim is to change the dynamics of the internal states of the controller when the actuator is saturated, and so the authors feed the difference between the unconstrained input signal of plant \(u(t)\) and this input passed through a saturation limiter \(\bar u(t)\) to the inner-loop compensator. The state compensator has no effect when the actuator is working linearly, but it modifies the state of the controller when the actuator is saturated. It can systematically reduce the wind-up effects and preclude input saturation. The design principle and procedure, together with some necessary analyses, are given, and two illustrative examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure.

MSC:

93B51 Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.)
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
37D45 Strange attractors, chaotic dynamics of systems with hyperbolic behavior
93C62 Digital control/observation systems
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1142/S0218127499001024 · Zbl 0962.37013 · doi:10.1142/S0218127499001024
[2] DOI: 10.1142/S0218127494000307 · Zbl 0813.58036 · doi:10.1142/S0218127494000307
[3] Dorf RC, Modern Control Systems (1995)
[4] DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00165-9 · doi:10.1016/S0005-1098(97)00165-9
[5] DOI: 10.1109/81.895324 · Zbl 0999.93024 · doi:10.1109/81.895324
[6] DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(87)90029-X · Zbl 0638.93036 · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(87)90029-X
[7] DOI: 10.1109/37.526915 · doi:10.1109/37.526915
[8] DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(94)90048-5 · Zbl 0825.93312 · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(94)90048-5
[9] Kuo BC, Digital Control Systems (1980)
[10] Lewis FL, Optimal Control (1986)
[11] Shieh LS, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 10 pp 2221– (2000)
[12] DOI: 10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00026-3 · doi:10.1016/S0019-0578(98)00026-3
[13] DOI: 10.1109/7.543870 · doi:10.1109/7.543870
[14] DOI: 10.1109/41.43010 · doi:10.1109/41.43010
[15] DOI: 10.1109/91.755395 · doi:10.1109/91.755395
[16] Ueta T, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 10 pp 1917– (2000)
[17] DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00044-3 · Zbl 0959.93504 · doi:10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00044-3
[18] DOI: 10.1142/S0218127498001947 · Zbl 0940.93048 · doi:10.1142/S0218127498001947
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.