Ken's Reviews > Second Place

Second Place by Rachel Cusk
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
730754
's review

liked it
bookshelves: contemporary, finished-in-2021

First of all, Jeffers, you'll want to know that this book consists of the protagonist -- a certain "M" who is a lady of letters (but no name) -- addressing an entire narrative to someone called Jeffers. You know this because, every two pages or so, she says "Jeffers" mid-sentence.

This, Jeffers, becomes a distraction for the reader.

Speaking of distraction, M has a thing for this famous painter named (wait for it) "L." As you can see, they are quite close, Jeffers. In the alphabet.

In the book, M cold-writes L, inviting him to a "second place" (read: cottage) on her property where he can paint in peace (note: a tall order, given her stalking propensities). The fact that a total stranger would write a famous painter thinking he would accept such a bizarre invitation is crazy. The fact that L accepts M's invitation is crazier still.

In literature, Jeffers, this is what's known as "the suspension bridge of disbelief."

M has a husband named Tony (you were expecting "T" perhaps?) who is like a large puppy dog. Think St. Bernard complete with mini-barrel collar. Devoted beyond belief (remember the bridge from last paragraph). But M, who is not very likeable (making the M-person point of view particularly trying, Jeffers) seems convinced that L will become her soul mate. And, of course, that he will paint her. And, of course, that the painting will become Starry, Starry M.

But he won't paint her, Jeffers! He's as ornery as Leonardo (or was it Michelangelo who had the temper?). Whichever. One of those Neapolitan grouches. And if you suspect this refusal might bring some schadenfreude (I looked up the spelling, Jeffers) for the reader, give yourself the Sherlock Holmes award!

As an omniscient POV narrative, this book might have been more interesting, but reckoning with the rather suffocating 3rd-person limited-to-M point of view makes it a bit of a trial. The author is trying to make some points about painting and life, I think, but it's the unlikable personality that keeps photo-bombing her intent. It's like a thick filter that doesn't so much filter things as block them. This happened with my lawn mower once, Jeffers, and it positively refused to go on!

Not that the book is all THAT bad, Jeffers. This isn't one of those stink bomb, one-star reviews you so cherish when visiting Goodreads. No, it had its moments. Like p. 128, where I marked the quote "Nothing evil ever dies. Especially of remorse." It reminded me of the front page of The New York Times from 2016-2020, Jeffers.

And, on p. 158, where I noted the line, "But the self is our god -- we have no other." I think Freud would like that, Jeffers. Just like he did the id and the super ego and a cigar being a cigar.

In the end, M learns something about herself as a mother and a wife, but not much about her L problem. I'm convinced there was a grand plan regarding L and painting and life, too. But it never quite got off the ground, Jeffers. Just like my plan to throw a big "Covid Is Over!" party this fall.

Well I suppose it's time to sign off, Jeffers. I've decided to 3-star this book. I kept reading, after all, though I don't know why. In the name of that mystery, I'm awarding the author some points. Clearly something was at play in the subconscious here, something the author was aware of and I was not.

Once I realize what this magical ingredient is, I plan to paint it. First, though, I will take a walk on the marshes. There's something about them -- never quite nailed down, but mentioned frequently -- in this book. Perhaps, then, if I see for myself?

Take care or, as they say nowadays: Stay safe (best place to succeed: that "second place" called a "cave")! Your trusted pen pal, Special K.
81 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Second Place.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

August 27, 2021 – Started Reading
August 27, 2021 – Shelved
August 28, 2021 –
page 70
37.63%
August 29, 2021 – Shelved as: contemporary
August 29, 2021 – Shelved as: finished-in-2021
August 29, 2021 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Chris (new)

Chris Great review! Haven't read anything by this author but I want to.


message 2: by Fionnuala (new) - added it

Fionnuala I would like to take a walk in those same marshes, Jeffers...I mean, Ken.
JKLM!


message 3: by Cheri (new)

Cheri Dear Special K., you've written the perfect review for this, I've come away with a heightened awareness of your seemingly unending patience, or perhaps it was a hope for finding a pot of gold at the other end of this seemingly strange rainbow of...? I highly suspect I love your review far more than I would this book!


message 4: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Chris wrote: "Great review! Haven't read anything by this author but I want to."


I see that I have now read three books by this author, perhaps liking this the least. But it was inspiring in its way, too.

Thanks for commenting!


message 5: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Fionnuala wrote: "I would like to take a walk in those same marshes, Jeffers...I mean, Ken.
JKLM!"


Ha-ha. The alphabet unleashed. And all for Jeffers, who probably stopped reading along about p. 54!

FGHI
JKLM


message 6: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Cheri wrote: "Dear Special K., you've written the perfect review for this, I've come away with a heightened awareness of your seemingly unending patience, or perhaps it was a hope for finding a pot of gold at th..."

I always read (and write) for that pot of gold. In reading, it's the payoff of a good book well written. In writing, on the other hand, it's the payoff of a good book well written.

Thanks for stopping by!


message 7: by Ilse (new)

Ilse You wrapped up your frustation/disappointment with the book entertainingly, Special K. It might take some time before I'll get to read this as there are more letters waiting to be read, (K. and G. for instance - reading From A to X: A Story in Letters was a wonderful experience, so a rather average L & M won't harm too much. Loved that line on not dying of remorse, reminded me of the cynicism that for a happy life one needs a sleepy conscience.


message 8: by Julie (new)

Julie To continue with the alphabet, Special K, I would think this would be an N-O-P-(E) for moi. Very entertaining review. What delightful hay you've made out of fodder!


message 9: by Violeta (new)

Violeta Although this 'Special K" of Julie's, above, is bringing to mind the cereal brand, I absolutely agree with her: yes, your writing is special, it's entertaining and witty. It has put a big smile on my face and it worked miracles with my mood this morning - which is something that Cusk never managed. Thank you, K!


message 10: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Ilse wrote: "You wrapped up your frustation/disappointment with the book entertainingly, Special K. It might take some time before I'll get to read this as there are more letters waiting to be read, ([book:K.|4..."

Loved following your links, Ilse. Of course, how special am I when Kafka has already bought up all the real estate at "K"? Right. Not very.

Which reminds me. I have a few Kafka books I haven't read and MUST before I face that GR guy. You know. The Grim Reaper. Who won't let us read in the afterlife, damn him.


Robin Oh Jeffers, you have to agree this review of K’s is one of the most clever and amusing (not to mention accurate) posted to Goodreads in recent days. I also found M to be a bore, but you knew that, Jeffers. And people said and thought the most nonsensical things! I also awarded three stars to this book, though with time, I feel less and less generous. So, prepare yourself, Jeffers. I may dock a star for sheer annoyance. But for K’s fantastic review? 5 blazing stars!!


message 12: by Laysee (new)

Laysee Brilliant review, Ken. Loved your creative write-up. Very refreshing.


message 13: by Ken (last edited Sep 02, 2021 04:34AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Julie wrote: "To continue with the alphabet, Special K, I would think this would be an N-O-P-(E) for moi. Very entertaining review. What delightful hay you've made out of fodder!"

Julie... Ha-ha on the "N-O-P-E." It reminds me of spelling words that might trigger the dog and get him hepped up for no reason: "C-O-O-K-I-E" and "W-A-L-K," for instance.

I've always wanted to be a man of letters. Is this cheating?


message 14: by Ken (last edited Sep 02, 2021 04:39AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Violeta wrote: "Although this 'Special K" of Julie's, above, is bringing to mind the cereal brand, I absolutely agree with her: yes, your writing is special, it's entertaining and witty. It has put a big smile on ..."

Truth be told (and it doesn't like to be in this day and age), the "Special K" sobriquet has been done before, notably by an NBA basketball player in the 80s, Greg Kelser.

Don't know much about him, but I do recall the nickname because I'm in the K Club (K Klub?) myself, and I don't find anything special about the cereal -- it's just another brand I never buy. That is, if they still make it.


message 15: by Julie (new)

Julie Ken wrote: "I've always wanted to be a man of letters ... Is this cheating?"

😀


message 16: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Robin wrote: "Oh Jeffers, you have to agree this review of K’s is one of the most clever and amusing (not to mention accurate) posted to Goodreads in recent days. I also found M to be a bore, but you knew that, ..."


I've experienced that sensation, too. About stars, I mean. Looking back on reviews, I sometimes think, "Was I too harsh?" (Meaning, donate a star and feel big-hearted.)

Or, "Was I too lenient?" (Meaning, dock a star and hightail it... this author will never see it, anyway -- unless she's a beginner just climbing the literary tower's ivy, in which case I would never do such a thing.")

Second thoughts, Jeffers. It's always a decision of what color and brush.


message 17: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Laysee wrote: "Brilliant review, Ken. Loved your creative write-up. Very refreshing."


Thank you, Laysee. It *was* like a creative writing exercise I assigned myself. The kind we used to *like* to get in school (and, as you know, those were few and far between).


Jeremy L IS quite close to M. I hadn’t thought of that hehe:)! I was on the fence. I liked some of the strange shenanigans once we got all the characters to the cottage especially the tension generated with his young uninvited guest, whose characterization I thought was perfect. L and M both learned some lessons the hard way.


message 19: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Yes, the young uninvited guest, as the monkey in the wrench, was a rare treat here! And K has learned some lessons the hard way, too.


Laura A shrewdly discerning review, K! I thought this book was extremely trying. I agree with your observation that an omniscient narrator would have made it more endurable, maybe even likeable. There were a few insightful reflections that stood out to me, also, but it was far too weighed down and cluttered by these constant attempts at profundity to really hit home.


message 21: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Laura wrote: "A shrewdly discerning review, K! I thought this book was extremely trying. I agree with your observation that an omniscient narrator would have made it more endurable, maybe even likeable. There we..."

Thanks for the affirmation, Laura. Agreed, there are insightful moments and this is a talented writer. It's just that this book did not exactly "sing."


Stephen Kowalkowski Hilarious review!


message 23: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Stephen wrote: "Hilarious review!"

Thank you, S!

=)


Vartika Fantastic review, Special K!


message 25: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Thanks, Vartika. Probably the review I most enjoyed writing in '21.


Vartika And definitely the review I've enjoyed most reading 10 days into this new year!


message 27: by Ken (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ken Ha. Thanks!


back to top