Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden track
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 22:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hidden track (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary definition with a HUGE and completely arbitrary example sheet. Trim, split the examples or delete. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and trim. The "received heavy radio airplay" list has clearly collapsed into a meaningless list of every hidden track people can think of, but a few of those examples seem fine, and the rest of the article seems factual and sourceable enough. --McGeddon (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. No valid reason advanced for deletion, and the subject appears encyclopedic. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but purge any non-notable albums/bands. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Some of the examples could/should be trimmed, but that's no reason to delete the whole article. —Mulad (talk) 15:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.