User talk:Wici Rhuthun 1

Hello, Wici Rhuthun 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mountain Ash Golf Club, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --GouramiWatcher ^(?) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mountain Ash Golf Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --GouramiWatcher ^(?) 16:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wernddu Golf Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw the article on the new pages feed. At the time, there was not context to support the importance of the club (although the recently added material may help to keep it). A deletion request is not a threat in any way and because I am not an administrator, I cannot delete pages, only request deletion through the tag I placed on the article. Regarding to your user page, they are used simply as an 'about me.' If you want people to see an important message, please place it on the talk page of the article to make it more accessible. Thanks. --GouramiWatcher ^(?) 17:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wici Rhuthun 1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bodwyn, Llanrhuddlad for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Corvoe (speak to me) 16:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing to put Bryn Hafod, Llannerch-y-medd up for deletion. The reason is that I think the place, as a settlement, is just too small. I have added a request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales#Bryn Hafod, Llannerch-y-medd asking for comments. You are welcome to add your own comments but please make it clear that you were the creator of the article.

Also, do not put the names of the MPs in a place article. At the next election they may change and you would have then have to update all those articles. Just leave the constituency link in the infobox and users can then find their names (and lots more) in the constituency article. Twiceuponatime (talk) 07:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree to both requests. Wici Rhuthun 1 (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Can you put

{{db-author|rationale=settlement too small for article}}

at the head of the article and it will speedily disappear. As the creator you have special rights; if I do it it has to go for discussion. Twiceuponatime (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling work on the new articles. Just noticed though that when you've put *[[List of localities in Wales by population]] {{Anglesey}} all on one line the template isn't rendering correctly and the towns in group1 are all mashed up together. I don't know why but if you make sure that the {{Anglesey}} is on a line by itself the problem goes away. You might not have been seeing it as it might be an operating system/browser issue but something goes wrong somewhere. Thanks. Nthep (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine for me. What can I do now? Wici Rhuthun 1 (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the template down one line and now it looks fine. Just have to see what happens on any future ones. Nthep (talk) 13:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll keep that in mind. And thanks for being nice and complementary! The first glimpse of goodness on this wiki! Wici Rhuthun 1 (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work on Welsh settlements. The problem is that it's redundant saying how far it is from London and Cardiff. Much more useful to say the distance from a major town in Anglesey and local situation.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed you are creating a lot of article stubs for hamlets of very small communities that merely state the hamlet exists, rather than offer any significant details about the hamlet. I don't think this tactic is in the best interest of Wikipedia readers. For instance, Tre-Ysgawen says nothing about the size or population of the hamlet (likely not more than 1000), nor any information of any other hamlets in Llanddyfnan. It might be more useful to readers to first develop a list hamlets in articles of the respective community/village or larger geographic place to give proper context and centralized coverage; simply because a place is named does not necessarily make it notable nor necessary. Should subsequent textual development of a particular hamlet warrant its eventual splitting, perhaps only then should the content be split. Please see WP:NGEO, WP:NPLACE, and WP:LOCAL for more guidance. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are creating a lot of articles for small settlements in Anglesey. The infobox you are adding has errors so that it is not displaying the correct (local) map. I have corrected some – see Capel Coch, Maenaddwyn - llok in history to compare the changes. The template is very particular and some of the parameters have to be very precise; some with brackets, some not.

Also, it is not necessary to be so precise. Lat/long is more than sufficient with four decimal places. Distances should be whole numbers (and you don’t need to convert to km – the template does that automatically). Twiceuponatime (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Derry Ormond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Llangybi

Tirymynach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pen-y-garn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know there is a template that will do all the working out for you once you know the distance in either km or miles. It's called {{convert}} and will convert either miles to km or vice versa. The basic syntax is easy so {{convert|55|mi|km|1}} produces 55 miles (88.5 km). Saves you having to make all the calculations yourself. Nthep (talk) 09:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you speak to anybody? I'm trying to help you!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you forget to finish these articles? Please fix the issues tagged. For examples of other such clubs, see Westchester Country Club and Country Club of Rochester for some ideas. Bearian (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't think people liked them. I'll take another look at the few I posted. Wici Rhuthun 1 (talk) 09:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded and removed tags.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wici Rhuthun 1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nefyn & District Golf Club for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. KaraokeMac (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NOT APPROPRIATE!!! How very rude. Please reinstate the article. I've made a copy here. "Ian Woosnam ranks it among his favourites and holds the club record with a 67" - that answers the notability aspect! Wici Rhuthun 1 (talk) 11:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wici Rhuthun 1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Caerphilly Golf Club for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. KaraokeMac (talk) 11:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wici Rhuthun 1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Llanwern Golf Club for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. KaraokeMac (talk) 11:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of golf courses in the United Kingdom might interest you. A lot of them needing linking though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Clawddnewydd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Cae Cymro), a shop (Siop y Fro) and a pub (Glan Llyn) all owned and ran by the villagers.<ref>[http://www.communityshops.coop/clawddnewydd-siop-y-fro Community website; accessed 9 May 2014</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wici Rhuthun 1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bausley with Criggion, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 19:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wici Rhuthun 1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cefnmeiriadog, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 20:02, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've noticed a lot of your pages are being marked up for deletion due to failing to meet various criteria,

If these are works in progress and there is the aim to come back to them to complete or improve them there are some options available that should help to reduce the chance of these being deleted.

If you wish to create a page in your sandbox as a test of its suitability for creation you can do so by following the link near the top of the page, When complete you can then use the request for creation link so other people can offer guidance or advice on what may be useful to make sure it isnt tagged for deletion.

A second option would be to tag the page as under construction so that people are aware it isnt complete so dont act in haste at deleting it. this can be done by adding the tag underconstruction in {{ }} at the top of the created page

Hope this helps Amortias (T)(C) 20:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are being nominated for deletion by multiple people. Maybe the problem is that you haven't read WP:N WP:RS etc. Make articles that better conform to policy, and they won't be nominated for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:23, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rudbaxton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Michael's Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tai-Hirion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent evidence that this places exists as a village. There is a farm of this name on the island evidence of anything larger cannot be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. S a g a C i t y (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Llangallo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llangallo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhos-Engan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhos-Engan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Nebo, Llaneilian—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. RobinLeicester (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tredegar Park Golf Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  — Amakuru (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wici Rhuthun 1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Goetre, Ceredigion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no place called Goitre shown on Google maps. There appears to be two buildings under the name Goytre on Election maps but not much evidence of a village. If this is simply a farmhouse, it doesn't appear notable. There are no available sources to prove the existence of this alleged settlement. Wikilinks point to the community in Monmouthshire. Time for article to go.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wici Rhuthun 1, after seeing this post of yours, I wondered if you were familiar with the WP:CANVASSING guidelines? -- DeFacto (talk). 10:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bala Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bala Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ruthin-Pwllglas Golf Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is a notable golf club despite its age. A BEFORE turns up news and book listings, but Wikipedia is not a directory of golf clubs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 00:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruthin-Pwllglas Golf Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthin-Pwllglas Golf Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 13:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elysian Grove has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria (WP:NLAND) and has been an orphan article since 2017.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Penrhyn, Anglesey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article doesn't say what Penrhyn is supposed to be ("Penrhyn is a in the community of Llanfair-yn-Neubwll") and has no real sources. I can find no evidence of a settlement called Penrhyn, only a beach and a caravan park.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tregynrig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tregynrig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 13:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bodrida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodrida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   00:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castellior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castellior until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   00:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornelyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   00:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Penmorwdd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find the place on Google Maps, which is the only source. I cannot find anything about Penmorwdd. Does it really exist?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]