Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Llangallo
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Llangallo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This place does not exist - it's a typographic error for Llanallgo, which does, and on which we have a stub article. Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Llanallgo Seasider91 (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- I also find it's an occasional typo for the church of St. Crallo, Coychurch (Llangrallo). I'd just get rid of it. Richard Keatinge (talk) 10:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps if it is an unlikely search. SwisterTwister talk 19:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Non-existent place. Probably could have been CSD's under G6. And I agree with SwisterTwister that a redirect is not necessary. Onel5969 TT me 13:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.