User talk:George Ho

Health bulletin One of my loved ones is experiencing health issues yet recovering, hopefully . This might affect my ability to frequently edit this project, but I can still continue to contribute. I'll reply to you whenever I can. Thanks.

I am diagnosed with "moderate autism", but I don't know whether it matters to communities. I'll address whatever issues involving me you can bring up, i.e. I'll take accurate criticisms to heart. (More at my user page...)

Archives

/Archives/2006 /Archives/2007 Sorry, no posts from year 2008! /Archives/2009 /Archives/2010 /Archives/2011 /Archives/2012 /Archives/2013 /Archives/2014 /Archives/2015 /Archives/2016 /Archives/2017 /Archives/2018 /Archives/2019 /Archives/2020 /Archives/2021 /Archives/2022

An arbitration case regarding The Rambling man has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)'s resignation as an administrator is to be considered under controversial circumstances, and so his administrator status may only be regained via a successful request for adminship.
2. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) is prohibited from insulting and/or belittling other editors. If The Rambling Man finds himself tempted to engage in prohibited conduct, he is to disengage and either let the matter drop or refer it to another editor to resolve. If however, in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, The Rambling Man does engage in prohibited conduct, he may be blocked for a duration consistent with the blocking policy. The first four blocks under this provision shall be arbitration enforcement actions and may only be reviewed or appealed at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Should a fifth block prove necessary, the blocking administrator must notify the Arbitration Committee of the block via a Request for Clarification and Amendment so that the remedy may be reviewed. The enforcing administrator may also at their discretion fully protect The Rambling Man's talk page for the duration of the block.

   Nothing in this remedy prevents enforcement of policy by uninvolved administrators in the usual way.

3. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) and George Ho (talk · contribs) are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
4. George Ho (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted from participating in selecting main page content. For clarity, this means he may not participate in:

   1. Any process in which the content of the main page is selected, including Did you know?, In the news, On this day, Today's featured article, Today's featured list, and Today's featured picture.
   2. Any process in which possible problems with the content of the main page are reported, including WP:ERRORS and Talk:Main Page.
   3. Any discussion about the above processes, regardless of venue.

   He may edit articles linked from or eligible to be linked from the main page (e.g., the current featured article) and may participate in content review processes not directly connected to main page content selection (e.g., reviewing Featured article candidates). He may request reconsideration of this restriction twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

5. The community is encouraged to review the selection process for the Did you know and In the news sections of the main page. The community is also reminded that they may issue topic bans without the involvement of the Arbitration Committee if consensus shows a user has repeatedly submitted poor content, performed poor reviews, or otherwise disrupted these processes.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man

Hello,

I’m writing to remind you that as a result of the arbitration case that both you and The Rambling Man are prohibited from interacting with each other, barring the usual exceptions. Recently, you posted questions to the election pages of multiple candidates where you indirectly made reference to The Rambling Man. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) Please note that such comments are not permitted under the interaction ban and further instances will result in a block. Best regards, Mike V • Talk 22:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I won't do that anymore for now, Mike. Shall I report this the next time it happens? Or can someone else do it? George Ho (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are referring to a violation of the interaction ban, you can mention it another admin once. Otherwise, it would be best to avoid all discussion related to The Rambling Man. Mike V • Talk 23:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I report his attempts to excuse himself to you, Mike? I felt unease when he made indirect references by saying "canvassing". I was prompted to ask questions when mentioned "canvassed". Is this his actions at the questions subpages excusable? George Ho (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, a warning has been made and I've encouraged him to leave things alone. I think that is sufficient for now. Mike V • Talk 00:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop a note that, as a result of extensive community discussion and numerous issues, the warning issued above has been overturned. [1] Regards, The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating IBAN with The Rambling Man at Talk:2017 (such as the Talk:2017#2017 Manchester Arena bombing section and discussion regarding the "Cholera outbreak"), you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Happy New Year!

George Ho,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightning Comics (1967) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightning Comics (1967) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mooonswimmer 14:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Glover (Survivor contestant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Gentry. Thanks! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 02:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ruby Tandoh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when baker Ruby Tandoh (pictured) publicly came out, she mocked critics who suggested that she had romanced a male contest judge? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruby Tandoh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ruby Tandoh), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 19,804 views (1,650.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

Unclear what makes her notable. Lots of sources, but why? What is she known for? Being a reality TV contestant does not mean notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Wiglesworth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:You're Makin' Me High The Remix Let It Flow US CD maxi-single.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harold A Fidler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George,

I go through a lot of PROD'd files and I was wondering why you prefered a pretty bland image of a record over a more visually appealing album cover. If they are both non-free images used to illustrate the article subject, in an article about that subject, then I think our readers would prefer an interesting album cover over an image of what the record looked like decades ago. I realize that you are more familiar with copyright guidelines than I am so I'm wondering what I missing here. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: I appreciate your preference for a cover art to illustrate a song, but various releases back then used either picture sleeves or generic ones. Many pre-1990s American vinyl releases and other overseas releases use generic sleeves. But then I figured that I can use free portion of any release, regardless of where it was released in. Otherwise, if I couldn't find a free replacement, then I can go for a non-free portion of a release from the song's home country. Worse, even some album arts don't belong to any specific single release but rather a compilation album or a song's parent album.

I nominated some of my uploads to FFD to have them evaluated. They were eventually deleted without objections from others. George Ho (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tamla Motown logo variant A.webp, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hot Press 40th Birthday June 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PD-AR-Movie has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 14:18, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dancer colum mccann.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article KVUE (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required because there is a hatnote already on the KVUE page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. From Bassie f (his talk page) 08:46, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Ho. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 10 Attitudes at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I Just Want to Make Love to You by Etta James UK CD single 1996 re-release.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Theme from Shaft by Isaac Hayes US single rainbow crescent variant.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clay Jordan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you find articles that are worthy of 1E AfD/redirect discussions, please consider notifying me. E.g. if you don’t see me at Survivor AfDs, please ping me. It’s not canvassing if I’m requesting it, right? These 1E-chopped-liver articles are WP:NOT and shouldn’t exist, especially the BLPs. I completely understand how an “event” causes a BLP to be created before someone steps up and makes a 1E article. But trying to kill the BLP makes many a seasoned editor wet their panties simply because “the sources are good”. Seeing those AfD closures was particularly satisfying. Artificial Nagger (talk) 04:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Even if the sources were sufficient to technically establish notability per WP:GNG, which I'm far from convinced they do, this would be a clear example of WP:BLP1E.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Gentry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April songs

my story today

just a little flower of encouragement for the health issues you are taking care of -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story today, Messiah (Handel), was my first dip into the FA ocean, thanks to great colleagues. - a few pics added, one day missing --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Boys of Summer by DJ Sammy featuring Loona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Boys of Summer by DJ Sammy featuring Loona.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Boys of Summer by DJ Sammy featuring Loona.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please see image in this article: https://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/newspapers/Digitised/Article/shinmin19930908-1.2.9.18

right click & translate to english if you need further explanation, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 12:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Billie Jean US 7-inch vinyl Side-A.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George Ho. You nominated File:Darin and Sheila Damude.jpg for discussion at FFD, but didn't do the same for File:Gerard Lowe.jpg. Just curious as to why since the way both files are being used is quite similar. The uploader of both files is the same and it might be hard to convince that user that one file is no good, but the other one is OK since they probably see no difference between the two. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about PROD-ding the Lowe image after the Damudes image, hoping that the uploader would leave it alone. Maybe I can include the Lowe image as part of a future multi-nom discussion on his other uploads of victims. George Ho (talk) 19:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Ho,

I just deleted some files your PROD'd but I noticed that you didn't post a notification on the talk page of the editor who uploaded them. Please use Twinkle any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/FFD/RFD/etc.) and set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator". We do have bots that sometimes fill in at times like this when a page tagger forgets to notify the page creator but it isn't 100% reliable. So, it would be much easier for you to post these notices, via Twinkle, when you tag a page for deletion. Please try Twinkle out, it really is a useful editing tool in so many ways. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reference, you don't need to use Twinkle to add a user talk page notification; you can simply copy-and-paste the notification template syntax in the prod deletion template onto the uploader's user talk page. When you add {{Proposed deletion}} to a file's page, just make sure the |help= parameter isn't set to |help=off. The notification template will be displayed by default if you remove the parameter altogether or set it to |help=yes. You can also add the same notification to the article's talk page or a relevant WikiProject's talk page if you want. FWIW, it's also a good idea to tag captions if they exist as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:17, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Winnie the Pooh and Tigger Too poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:1E. Most of the sources are about her involvement Survivor. Need to demonstrate notability outside of the show.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephenie LaGrossa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Ho! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Survivor: Thailand. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

He doesn't appear to have any notability outside of the show, so this is better off on that article. I recommend condensing it some first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clay Jordan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 05:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George Ho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tom Westman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hells kitchen 11 dvd raw uncensored.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hells kitchen season 8 dvd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hells kitchen season 16 digital release.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your generosity of spirit is appreciated. Orenburg1 (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I remember you uploaded some cleaner audio of fair use songs a while back and I was wondering if you could help me out. There's a free (commons!) video with a bunch of Spanish and Catalan names being said, and I was hoping to create audio files to add these to the relevant articles, but it seems like however I export the audio it's always the wrong kind of .wav for the uploader. If I just uploaded the video, would you be able to (separate and) upload audio files of each name? Thanks, Kingsif (talk) 03:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme get this straight: you intend to upload fair use or free videos, right? Or audio and video? And which video format? I can get audio format .wav. Regarding naming, how about using {{rename media}} (if local) or {{rename}} (if Commons)? Or you can simply rename the files yourself via Wizard before uploading the file. George Ho (talk) 04:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, there's a free video. I have separated audio and saved it as .wav format, but the Commons uploader says it only takes a certain type of wav file and what I have is wrong... it's not working. I can't find a way to convert the audio to .ogg, which I think is the only other file type the uploader accepts. As I remember you have uploaded .ogg files before, I was going to upload the video (as .webm, which the uploader automatically converts) and am asking if you would be able to take the audio from this video and upload to Commons as .ogg files. The audio is of (peoples') names, nothing to do with file naming - that's the other part, it's maybe 10 names, so I could also split up the video to multiple uploads, one for each name. Kingsif (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.mp3 is now a free format and (IMO) easier to use than ogg, and the uploader should be aware of it. (Still can't figure out why ogg is still used more often than mp3, despite mp3's patent being expired for several years.) If you still insist on using wav instead, both c:COM:File types#WAVE and c:Help:Convertin video should help you more. How about the Audacity software? George Ho (talk) 09:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't "insist", the uploader doesn't accept other formats I've been able to convert to, and only gave an explanation about .wav. Sorry for asking. Kingsif (talk) 01:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't be more of a help. Honestly, I've not exported videos into .wav before. You can ask at c:COM:VPT for help on legitimately converting videos into WAV. George Ho (talk) 02:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's still not what I was asking, lol. It's okay. Kingsif (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the naming, when I uploaded JPEG and PNG, I can use the same titles only as long as no other JPEG file uses the same name of the JPEG file and no other PNG file uses the same name of the PNG file.

Same may be true for videos and audios... only as long as no other WebM file uses the same name of the WebM file and no other WAV file uses the same name of the WAV file. You might or might not ignore those potential warnings. George Ho (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Politely, this is absolutely nothing to do with what I was asking at all. It became clear you didn't get it a few replies back, don't worry. Kingsif (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is what you were referring, right: As I remember you have uploaded .ogg files before, I was going to upload the video (as .webm, which the uploader automatically converts) and am asking if you would be able to take the audio from this video and upload to Commons as .ogg files. I think I overlooked this part, didn't I? You want me to export one of videos into OGG, right? If so, then.... Well, I apologize for overlooking what was supposed to be a simple request.

I favor and prefer MP3 moreso due to it being compatible with multiple devices. Unsure about OGG, but it's playable on browsers and the Wikipedia mobile app. I'd like to know which video you were referring to, so I can create an OGG file. (Honestly, I'm flabbergastered by the uploader's reluctance to go for MP3.) George Ho (talk) 00:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at WT:NFCC § US Capitol attack participant photos. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Billie Jean US 7-inch vinyl Side-A.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me by Elton John UK vinyl Side-A.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Live and Let Die by Wings UK vinyl solid centre.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Pie by Don McLean US vinyl single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Let the Sun Go Down on Me by Elton John UK vinyl Side-A.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello George Ho, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want an edit war. Wikipedia:Ownership of content. We can do more Requests for comment or you can compromise. You just reverted 4 sources and a photo from the article. I have read the talk page. Ikipedia2 (talk) 10:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize that was my mistake @George Ho I didn't see the edit I created was moved below into another section. I removed the photo. As recompense (an apology), if you don't want any photo in the article at all, at the top of this article, you can either put any photo you wish or delete the infobox altogether. I was wrong. I apologize. Ikipedia2 (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		The Barnstar of Diplomacy is awarded to users who have helped to resolve, peacefully, conflicts on Wikipedia. This barnstar is awarded to George Ho for always taking the high road and being a diplomat. Ikipedia2 (talk) 18:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rock with You by Michael Jackson Side A US vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:RETAIN, MOS:VAR, and WP:ALBUMSTYLE, please undo the addition of {{track listing}} in this edit. This article uses a plain list style and that should be retained. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why or what you mean. By adding more info, if I use the plain list format, the execution would've looked sloppy, and the source would've looked less readable. I left disc two listing as-is yesterday because I felt exhausted, but I plan to reformat the disc two listing with the same template. George Ho (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is that this article doesn't use {{track listing}}. There are several valid styles (plain list, a table, the template) and the consensus is that there is a strong preference for leaving the original style of an article. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the consensus for the listing style of the article about Digging Deep: Subterranea? George Ho (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was the original style. That's what MOS:RETAIN and MOS:VAR are about. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:RETAIN refers to English-language varieties or dialects, like American English and British English. As I see, MOS:VAR says to use the first style used in an early non-stub revision if no consensus for either style has been made, i.e. plain listing.

But look at the styling right now. After adding writing credits and tracks' origins, is the listing still readable more than "track listing" template? George Ho (talk) 19:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait... Perhaps MOS:LIST would make more sense than MOS:VAR? (MOS:ALBUM is an essay, so enforcing it wouldn't make sense, IMO.) George Ho (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure about MOS:MUSIC, which doesn't say much about track listings other than discouraging them in song articles. George Ho (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the track listing template is ugly and it is not as useful to me. As far as the place to include styling information, note that this is discussed at WP:ALBUMSTYLE, not WP:ALBUM. As far as album style advice being incorporated into MOS:MUSIC, it has been discussed at WT:ALBUM and there is consensus for it, but no one has put forth the effort to get it to that state yet. :/ ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this discussion you're referring to? George Ho (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant threads:

• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_70#Why_isn't_the_albums_style_guide_part_of_the_MoS?
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_71#Confirming_a_passage_in_WP:ALBUMSTYLE
• Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_71#Track_listing_styles

Happy to help if I can provide more context. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the discussions aren't RfC, to be frank. They aren't straw polls. Also, I can't determine whether there's a consensus. I see just editors disagreeing, I think. Maybe I was skimming too fast and couldn't bother to read a lot and reread? George Ho (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, maybe some of that's extraneous. And to be clear, I don't know of an RfC on the topic.

• 2020 thread about how we need to have incorporation into the MoS: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_60#WP:ALBUM_needs_an_official_MOS
• A very brief discussion about including the existing album style advice into the MoS properly: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Formalising_Manual_of_Style_for_albums

That's all I can find immediately where someone from WP:ALBUM is saying "hey, WP:ALBUMSTYLE should be part of the MoS formally". I think that actually answers your question and isn't superfluous or otherwise off topic. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:14, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Unsure what to make about two additional discussions you provided. The latter one ended without consensus for one proposal. The former looks lackluster, while the essay hasn't yet been promoted to a guideline. This is a case-by-case situation, yet you are apparently seeking a standard. Why not create a new discussion on this at Talk:Digging Deep: Subterranea and invite a few projects for their inputs? George Ho (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if anything, it's the other way around: since you want to change the existing style, you need to get consensus by convincing others that there is something extraordinary, per WP:BRD or WP:RETAIN. Otherwise, we could have 200,000 of these back-and-forths where you (or someone else) are adding {{track listing}} and I (or someone else) am removing it back and forth. That's why MOS:RETAIN exists: where we have different styles, keep the existing one so that we don't expend these resources on this kind of stuff. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why use MOS:RETAIN, which refers to only English varieties, not any list format? George Ho (talk) 23:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*sigh MOS:VAR. It applies to all kinds of styles, George.

―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cat Country 貓城記 circa 1947.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just to ask you as you are an expert of big brother and franchises of the show User:George Ho is it necessary to add day entered in late entrants rows for nominations table like over here Bigg Boss (Malayalam season 5)#Nomination table because big brother tables don’t have this on. 2A02:6B68:10:6100:54CE:D971:7BF1:43E1 (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coy vance duke of hazzard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hyperba21 (talk) 13:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the most reputable universities in China, Fudan University deserves a comprehensive wikipedia page for the global audience. However, the user has cut down more than half of the carefully curated and edited contribution over the years by many other users for no reason.

I would like to specifically ask what is the reason behind deletion of the previous history section, especially regarding the funding and Chinese meaning behind the university name as cited here: "Fudan University, then romanized as Fuh Tan, was founded as Fudan Public School in 1905, by Ma Xiangbo, SJ, who had resigned from Aurora University. The two Chinese characters Fu (復, means "again") and Dan (旦, means "morning", "light" ), meaning both "(heavenly light shines) day after day" and "Aurora Revived"." This entire paragraph was deleted, and the previous user cited reasons are :"WP:NOTADVERT, WP:RS, WP:NOT, WP:BOOSTER", please specify which one this paragraph violated and how so?

Also, the following sections describing the history from 1911-present was completely deleted. What is the reason for this? To compare, Zhejiang University has a very similar section, which the user did not delete, what is the reason behind? Frostst (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To compare, Zhejiang University has a very similar section, which the user did not delete. Please be careful of using "other stuff exists" argument. Furthermore, are you associated with the Fuhan University? If so, please read WP:COI. George Ho (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, but can you specify the reason behind deleting history and university name origin? What is the standard here? Help me understand please!Frostst (talk) 22:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not only the material you reinserted lacks references, but also it seems to be promoting and/or favoring the University, i.e. pro-University, which is against WP:NPOV policy. As I see so far, your article edits are of just one article. What are other articles you have considered? George Ho (talk) 02:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Mayer Dukes of Hazzard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hyperba21 (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In February 2024, I tried to replace the single covers for the songs "Alone Again (Naturally)" and "Helter Skelter" (song) (File:Alone Again single.jpg and File:The Beatles "Helter Skelter" US picture sleeve.jpg) with free single labels from Commons (c:File:Alone Again (Naturally) by Gilbert O'Sullivan side-A 1972 US release.jpg and c:File:Helter Skelter by The Beatles B-side label US vinyl (copy 2).png) as they likely failed WP:NFCC#1. Both were promptly reverted by a user who said that the cover arts are not "fully replaceable" with the vinyl labels, and both cover arts survived FFDs calling for their replacement/deletion (WP:Files for discussion/2024 February 16#File:Alone Again single.jpg and #File:The Beatles "Helter Skelter" US picture sleeve.jpg). What are your thoughts about this? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reading FFD discussions, I figured that pro-cover arts people will favor keeping them. I'd refrain from re-nominating them for now until a lot of time passes. Of course, there are other songs to consider, but if I were you, I'd focus more on pre-1980s single releases if you wanna continue with the same mission. Meanwhile, I added a caption for Alone Again (Naturally). George Ho (talk) 03:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How long would "a lot of time" be? Three months? Six months? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 03:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be safer, try years... or decades.... unless there are special circumstances? George Ho (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and furthermore, I'd be careful of (articles about) rock songs or songs by Madonna if I were you. George Ho (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which songs should be prioritized then? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That... I can't say much except avoid classic rock songs and Madonna songs. And maybe avoid songs or genres that certain users have been specializing in. George Ho (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered stopping your campaign against cover art altogether? This is not something that has community support (as has been evidenced at FFD) and if you want a general policy against it you should gain consensus for that, instead of citing NFCC (which again, the community does not interpret in the same way as you do).

Your plan of working only on articles that have a low amount of eyes on them, where editors are unlikely to care, indicates that you know you're editing against consensus. Please stop. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli: I'd love to stop if not for fears of misinforming and misleading general public into believing that a cover art is the standard artwork of a single release and if not for other editors omitting captions as "irrelevant" or "non-controversial". Readers looking at a vinyl label would identify one part of a release, some of them more curious and willing to research further. Other readers ofa sing article would jump into conclusions and then... stop researching further... or just listen to the song over and over without having to research. Avoiding misinformation is a high priority, in my opinion. The consensus, I think, would consist of those wanting to attract mass appeal without consider accuracy and probably young'uns who are oblivious about much of history. George Ho (talk) 02:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you want to avoid misinformation, but why can't you just use a caption for the cover art? It'd be clear to our readers that the cover art wasn't used everywhere if a caption is added. Ignoring this, though, it still isn't acceptable to act unilaterally when you acknowledge that the overall community disagrees with you on this topic. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Sometimes, an editor can remove one older caption and then a newer one. (2) Even a caption might not ease my concerns about which portion or cover art is appropriate as lead image. (3) Lately, there has been a trend of eliminating captions from articles about most recent songs, especially when a cover art is universal. (4) Most album articles may not necessarily need a caption; unsure about song articles. (5) No point on adding a caption for an existing image if I'd replace an existing image with another one.

I used to prefer releases matching nationality of a singer, but now I realize free alternative would be more suitable especially to compensate insufficient depth about one song. George Ho (talk) 03:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are really issues though? Yes, if an image doesn't need a caption, then it doesn't need one. It shouldn't be too hard to pick a suitable lead image in most cases, and it's clear that editors prefer actual cover art to pictures of the records. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if an image doesn't need a caption, then it doesn't need one. For newer singles, sure. But various artworks have been used for specific releases, most of them overseas.

Many American singles lacked picture sleeves back in those pre-CD vinyl days, and old surviving singles occasionally or often have been traded from one generic sleeve to another. Even some picture sleeves were discarded for whatever reason, probably wear and tear, or the same reason listeners discarded singles, or... I dunno.

To recognize a vinyl single, if a picture sleeve is absent, a surviving vinyl label should suffice, but nowadays that's as if you are a vinyl collector or into vinyl again amid ongoing vinyl revival era. A single lacking labels and picture sleeves would be harder to identify, honestly. I might say the same about CD and cassette singles, but would those be different stories?

it's clear that editors prefer actual cover art to pictures of the records. Not surprised. However, that also leads some editors into using (misleading) cover arts of parent albums using same names of songs, thinking that such cover arts would fool readers, especially without using captions. Millennials and newer generation, as I fear, probably wouldn't bother researching older songs but rather newer ones heard on radio or streaming, especially when researching has never been one of their top priorities. Even they wouldn't care much about how music industry worked back in old pre-digital days from past consumers' perspectives.

I still think vinyl labels should sufficiently help readers recognize specific American releases lacking official picture sleeves, but that's when no free alternatives exist at this point and when songs or singers come from the USA. Same if from other regions, like the UK or Australia. —George Ho (talk) 11:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tell Me If You Still Care by S.O.S. Band 1983 US vinyl 12-inch.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supercalifradgilisticexpialidocious by Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke US vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AstonishingTunesAdmirer 連絡 18:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George, you appear not to have done anything with the recently restored File:Sabrina Spellman casting magic milk.png. It will be deleted if you don't use it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: I tried, but another user reverted the change and instead changes revisions of the one that the user intends to use but is discussed at FFD. George Ho (talk) 01:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Way It Is First issue album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Overnight sensation hit record by raspberries US single side-A.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! File:Take me in your arms kim weston Canadian single side-A.png seems to be a duplicate of File:I hear a symphony the supremes Canadian single side-A.png. Was that your intention? Jonteemil (talk) 16:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not at all. As I now realized, I uploaded the wrong image. I was able to use an image from the source that I cited at the time of upload. George Ho (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I figured that might've been the case. Jonteemil (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Unchained Melody 1955 sheet music.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:With a Little Help from My Friends by Joe Cocker UK vinyl single Side-A.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cry Me a River sheet music 1953.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfie by Cilla Black UK single side-A.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion at WT:OLY whether this is a good idea. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, George,

Please consider posting your own notifications with PROD'd articles and files rather than relying on a bot to do this for you. I've found that FastilyBot doesn't always post notifications when it should and it is easier for the editor tagging the page to do it themself. Just use Twinkle to tag the page and, in your Twinkle Preferences, make sure the "Notify page creator" box is checked off. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: With all due respect, must I notify those inactive for one year, three months, or what? Also, Twinkle doesn't provide notification about multiple pages (articles, files, or any other) by the same author or provider. I would have to manually notify the same person about multiple things instead. George Ho (talk) 22:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} tag from File:Carola The Flame.ogg, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this file should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Thanks! jlwoodwa (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} tag from File:MinaParole.ogg, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this file should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Thanks! jlwoodwa (talk) 03:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Edge magazine issue 323 25th anniversary.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, use of templates, such as {{pb}} for paragraph breaks, is better for many purposes - such as accessibility - than html tags.

This is just a hint, not a complaint (your edit conflicted with mine on the blackout RfC, but I've left yours in place, since editing other people's comments is meant to be very minimal).

This comment doesn't really need to be split into three paragraphs via para breaks; I'm just doing them here as an illustration. :) Boud (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]