Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 June 15

June 15

File:Unchained Melody 1955 sheet music.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a sheet music cover of Unchained Melody as the lead/infobox image, but I've wondered recently whether it's needed and compliant with NFCC, especially "contextual significance" criterion. If not, then I won't object its deletion. George Ho (talk) 04:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:On The Radio (Belgium).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Displaying at least two releases may fail WP:NFCC#3a. This is a Belgian release (Discogs) and is a reverse version of the parent compilation album's front cover. Should use the other image (File:On the radio donna summer US single variant A.png) instead. George Ho (talk) 05:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Starship Versions.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file being used as fair use, but missing fair use rationale box (not completely required) and the rationale provided is incomplete (missing WP:NFCCP#10c). This file does not meet WP:NFCCP#8 "Contextual Significance" - it is not necessary to enhance the reader's understanding of the versions of the SpaceX Starship; the different sized rockets can be visualized based on the article's content and the data could be summarized without needing to show this slide. Consigned (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The table has already been swapped out in SpaceX Starship#Versions (WP:NFCCP#7 fell). I've also found a transparent higher-res version of Starship V3 in an FAA publication, so WP:NFCCP#1 is gone too now since a V2 graphic could be created from File:Starship stack V3.png. HLFan (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.PNG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File is on Commons with the same name but have a keep local. However the uploader that added the keep local is deceased and therefore not active anymore. So the reason for the keep local no longer exist. It was suggested on Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2024_April_24#File:4-cube_4^4.png that files are deleted via a PROD. But the file was proposed for deletion in 2009 so I can’t do a PROD. Back then it was suggested to delete because it was obsolete and replaced by an svg. It was kept because uploader requested and it was used as a source for the svg. Now the file is moved to Commons so there is no longer any issue in deleting the file. MGA73 (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.PNG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File is on Commons with the same name but have a keep local. However the uploader that added the keep local is deceased and therefore not active anymore. So the reason for the keep local no longer exist. It was suggested on Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2024_April_24#File:4-cube_4^4.png that files are deleted via a PROD. But the file was proposed for deletion in 2009 so I can’t do a PROD. Back then it was suggested to delete because it was obsolete and replaced by an svg. It was kept because uploader requested and it was used as a source for the svg. Now the file is moved to Commons so there is no longer any issue in deleting the file. MGA73 (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.