Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 31

May 31

File:Gul Wareen Bacha performing at Rahman Baba's Shrine.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The licencing is in doubt. There are no EXIF details, but the uploader declares themself to be the copyright owner. I believe that they need to furnish proof of the right to upload this picture here via WP:VRT otherwise it cannot remain here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Overnight sensation hit record by raspberries US single side-A.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This label consists only of simple text on a solid-color background and is thus ineligible for copyright due to being below the required threshold of originality. License should thus be changed to {{PD-ineligible}}. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 18:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the image has the old, classic Capitol logo. Well, it's tiny, but you should see it at the trademark notice. Furthermore, the shape of the logo resembles the actual US Capitol itself. I'll try to find other free alternatives if I can. George Ho (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice it now. Could the old logo be considered de minimis, as it does not contribute as much to the label's greater significance (especially with the larger Capitol wordmark at the bottom)? JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umm.... not to my eyes, unfortunately. The Capitol Records authored the vinyl side label, confirming its authorship. De minimis doesn't apply, i.e. the old logo is anything but that. George Ho (talk) 20:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, I uploaded this free alternative: File:Overnight sensation by raspberries Australian single side-A.png. George Ho (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.