User talk:FULBERT/Archive 81

Hi, this is Raymond and it's my 4th post. 1. I add the rank of Wanda Group on the 2020 China Top 500 Private Enterprises List. 2. Link to diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wanda_Group&type=revision&diff=1052965019&oldid=1046437252 3. I realized the source of reference should be reliable. --RaymondZqiu (talk) 03:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

RaymondZqiu, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, I have assigned myself this article. Thank you!--RaymondZqiu (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

RaymondZqiu Great. Current with Week 4. --- FULBERT (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sudharmono on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, everyone. Here is Haoxuan Nie's week 2 report.

1. I found that my assigned article is rated C level, which means there is a lot to fill in. The article uses a number of sub-headings to describe in detail where this climate exists on different continents. The content of the article is also related to the topic, but the whole article does not cite many reliable sources, which needs to be added.

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humid_subtropical_climate

3. I think actively adding in-text citations in every sentence of the article can enhance the professionalism and credibility of the article, making it a good entry. A good article requires a neutral tone, a clear structure, balanced content, and good citations. --Nenenie (talk) 22:51, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Nenenie Please complete the article evaluation per the instructions and steps in the Evaluate Wikipedia training assignment and then ping me here when it is done. You will then have a link to your evaluation on your own sandbox page. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT Dear professor, I completed the article evaluation, here is the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nenenie/Evaluate_an_Article --Nenenie (talk) 00:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Nenenie, Nice work. Current for this week. FULBERT (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

1. The article that I choose was "Asian Hip Pop". This is currently a level C article and needs many improvements. The history background part seems to be incomplete and many key figures and people were not added to the article. The citation also has some issues and some do not contain one. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bl2240/Evaluate_an_Article 3. I learned that all articles should be reviewed and evaluated before sending to the public. If not, others would get incomplete or false information. --Bl2240 (talk) 07:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERTHi, I just assign myself the article in the Dashboard. Please check it out, thx! --Bl2240 (talk) 05:20, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240, Nice overview, and current with this week. FULBERT (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

1. The article that I copyedited was "Changpeng Zhao" (The CEO of Binance). 2.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Changpeng_Zhao&type=revision&diff=1050501631&oldid=1047007898 3. I learned that Wikipedia is free for all to edit, yet we should be extra careful when doing our editing. In this case, the original writer did not provide the DOB for Changpeng Zhao. --Bl2240 (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240, I would ordinarily revert your edit with a message similar to: "The source used here does not fulfill the Wikipedia policy of using reliable, third party WP:INDEPENDENT published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy WP:RELIABLE" because the source you used is not as credible or reliable as would be ideal. However, being your first edit, I will accept. Nice learning to edit, though please use a more credible source (a journal article, Statista, NYTimes, etc.) next time. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240 Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here and it will then be complete and with your credit. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, Thanks and I added this one in the Dashboards. --Bl2240 (talk) 05:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240, You actually added a citation, so beyond what was needed for this week. You are current. FULBERT (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, this is dongjunjie's second week post

1. I found that the articles I assigned belong to the Academic disciplines category. This article answers very rigorously. This article is defined and recognized by the academic journals that publish the research results, as well as the academic groups and academic departments or faculties in the colleges and universities where the practitioners belong. At the same time, it has a very comprehensive references as a support, so that readers can obtain a lot of useful knowledge from it 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-cultural_communication 3. I learned how to add citations in the text correctly in this article to enhance the professionalism and credibility of the article. 4.the link of evaluation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jjjjdddd199704/Evaluate_an_Article#Evaluate_the_article --Jjjjdddd199704 (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Jjjjdddd199704, Nice overview. Current with this week. FULBERT (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

1. The article that I copyedited was "Ren Zhengfei" (The CEO of Huawei). 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren_Zhengfei 3. Because everyone can edit the wiki, I afarid to provide errors Information, and I checked my reference again and again. In this change, I found that the original text did not mention Ren Zhengfei’s ranking and wealth in Forbes, so I added "In April 2021, the Forbes Global Rich List was released, and Ren Zhengfei ranked 2378 on the list with a fortune of 1.3 billion US dollars. "this sentence. 4. the link of "Ren Zhengfei"'s Bibliography, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jjjjdddd199704/Ren_Zhengfei/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography --Jjjjdddd199704 (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Jjjjdddd199704, Great! Current with this week. FULBERT (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone! This is Tianhao Fu. This is my first time editing with Wikipedia and I am very excited! TFMonk19970531 (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

TFMonk19970531, Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you find this an interesting experience! FULBERT (talk) 22:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, This is Saba. I did assign an article for this week, and then I evaluated the assigned article. Please see the below link of the sandbox I created to see the process of what I have done. --SABA90S (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SABA90S/Evaluate_an_Article

SABA90S Nice work! Current. --- FULBERT (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone! Here is Ruijia Liang. I am so excited to editing Wikipedia. And Let's be "Wikipediar". --Cloi929 (talk) 12:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Cloi929, Welcome to Wikipedia; I hope you find this a valuable experience! FULBERT (talk) 01:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone, this is Huachen Bu, I'm really excited at the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia! Come along! --Beccabubu (talk) 12:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Beccabubu, Welcome to Wikipedia; I hope you find this a valuable experience! FULBERT (talk) 01:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

1. My Copyedit article is "A Madman's Diary". Here is the link, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Madman%27s_Diary

2. I just added some details and change some words that can make the article more specific. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Madman%27s_Diary&type=revision&diff=1051127236&oldid=1045458837

3. I was worried about revising the article at first. I was afraid I didn't know enough about it and would make mistakes. So I chose a topic that I particularly liked and knew well. I think by adding some details, readers can better understand the main idea of the article and feel the feelings the author wants to express. Make the story described in the theme more vivid. --Nenenie (talk) 18:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Nenenie, This is fine for now. You may want to add a citation to this as well given the amount you contributed, though I think this is good enough for now. Current. FULBERT (talk) 01:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are all doing well, this is Kai Wu's report for the week 2 assignment. This article I assigned to myself is related to stock market protection. It's a class C level article so there is plenty of room for improvement. For this article, I found that it has a daily average of 146 views. there are some issues of the content are lack of evidence and support, the stock analysis method is currently missing, such as the current ratio, Return on Equity, etc. None of these important methods for stock market analysis are listed; moreover, these content will be added on.

Link to my article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_market_prediction

what I have learned in the process is by adding technical content into theoretical content can better enhance the credibility of the article.Gdaymate011 (talk) 01:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Gdaymate011, Please complete the article evaluation per the instructions and steps in the Evaluate Wikipedia training assignment and then ping me here when it is done. You will then have a link to your evaluation on your own sandbox page. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Dear Professor, the link of evaluation, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gdaymate011/Evaluate_an_Article Gdaymate011 (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Gdaymate011, Please remember to indent your replies with one colon ": " for each level of indent you want, as this helps with readability. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

User:FULBERT fixed format

Gdaymate011 I will mark this as completed, but please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Assignment 2 is now current. --- FULBERT (talk) 18:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mehmed Handžić on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone, this is Kyle. I am glad to be here and have my first editing experience with Wikipedia.Notkc01 (talk) 06:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Notkc01, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you find this an interesting and exciting experience! FULBERT (talk) 10:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi professor, this is Jing. It is my first time editing the wiki and I am excited to learn more skills. Jw6740 (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Jw6740, Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you find learning to edit to be interesting! FULBERT (talk) 13:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello professor, This is Chenjshi(Yuqiong), it is my first time editing Wikipedia, i hope i can learn a lot from this part. Chenjshi (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2021 (UTC) Chenjshi(talk) 01:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Chenjshi Welcome to Wikipedia! Make sure to add a space before signing, as it did not capture your full Wikipedia name (it was not turned into a link). --- FULBERT (talk) 21:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Chenjshi Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. Make sure to preview it and confirm you are logged on first. --- FULBERT (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

18:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello professor, I am YiFan Feng. This is my first time editing Wikipedia and I am very excited. I don’t know why the content I uploaded disappeared. This is the second time I have written this content. I hope it can be saved and let me complete my learning goals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yifannn (talk • contribs) 04:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Yifannn Please remember to sign each of your posts using four tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. Do this as a reply and then ping me here, and then I will take a look at it and reply. --- FULBERT (talk) 01:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The article I assign is “communication studies”. Good communication skills are essential to allow others and yourself to understand information more accurately and quickly, so I find it is interesting to learn more about this area.

There are some issues with this article, so I made some adjustment advice below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Beccabubu/Evaluate_an_Article

I think the whole process of evaluating a Wikipedia article is fun and challenging; it gives value to my knowledge and helps me learn about new things. --Beccabubu (talk) 13:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Beccabubu, Nice work. Please do not indent your initial posts here; only indent replies. OK for now and Week 2 is now current. FULBERT (talk) 01:39, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, this is Kai Wu's third assignment 1: My copyedited article is the "Opium War".this is the link to my assigned article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars.

2: I have added one paragraph regarding the history of the opium war in order to make the article looks more detailed. this is my diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opium_Wars&type=revision&diff=1051895188&oldid=1050470888.

3: The reason I am doing this article is that I'm very interested in history. Therefore, I hope to make this historical article more complete through my own contribution. Through my reading of this article, I found that many parts are not quite complete. I added some historical background at the beginning, hoping to make the article more detailed.

4: The link for the article "the Opium War" bibliography:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gdaymate011/Opium_Wars/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography Gdaymate011 (talk) 06:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Gdaymate011, Nice work. Current with Week 3. FULBERT (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

This week I learned how to assign an article while looking up references online. I have a better understanding of this editing system, including how to edit an encyclopedia and how to build one. The whole process is as rigorous as writing an academic paper.Sleep by 11 (talk) 16:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Sleep by 11, Please finish all parts of this assignment for this week and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 23:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

This is huilin, this is my first time using Wikipedia and editing it. It will be hard for me, but I will try my best. Huilin826 (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Huilin826, Welcome to Wikipedia; hoping you find it an exciting space! FULBERT (talk) 23:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi everyone, This is Kyle. Hope everyone is having a good week. Here is my Week2 assignment.

1. The article is about physical fitness and it gives people with any level of fitness knowledge with a general idea of the fitness world.

2. The link for the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_fitness#High_intensity_interval_training

3. The article made a good general introduction for physical fitness but I found that each training category was only described by one sentence. For some categories, the information is not accurate and can be revised. Here is my evaluation link for the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Notkc01/Evaluate_an_Article Notkc01 (talk) 13:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Notkc01, Nice work on Week 2. Done. FULBERT (talk) 00:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, everyone, this is Amber. 1. I found an article that talked about the Chinese language, but its timeline is not very clear. The 1950s is very important for the revolution of the Chinese. so I edited it be highlighted in bold. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_language 3. A good article should have very clear. A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview.--Amber MWY (talk) 14:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Amber MWY, Please complete the article evaluation per the instructions and steps in the Evaluate Wikipedia training assignment and then ping me here when it is done. You will then have a link to your evaluation on your own sandbox page. --- FULBERT (talk) 23:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, Hi professor, I did it but I do not know why it did not show that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amber_MWY/Evaluate_an_Article--Amber MWY (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Amber MWY, The page this sent me to was not your completed evaluation. Please review the training as the link to do it is in there. Ping me when done. FULBERT (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, Hi professor, I found this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amber_MWY/Evaluate_an_Article. Please check it, Thank you.--Amber MWY (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Amber MWY, OK, now answer some of the questions for the evaluation itself. It asks you questions on the top of the page so answer some of them on the bottom. Ping me here when done and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 13:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT,Dear Professor, I answered it again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amber_MWY/Evaluate_an_Article Thank you!--Amber MWY (talk) 15:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Amber MWY, This is still a bit short, but good enough for now. Week 2 is done. FULBERT (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, Thank you, Professor!--Amber MWY (talk) 03:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi All,

1. This week I was working on the article the same as last one, which is "Asian Hip Pop". There was citation missing in 1990's Chinese hip pop on a very important person in the music history of modern China, Cui Jian. I added the reference, which was a journal written by Andreas Steen on Chinese pop music.

2. Link to the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asian_hip_hop&type=revision&diff=1052462043&oldid=1038493053

3. I learn that citation is vital in a published article since it establishes the credibility of the article, especially when it comes to historical events we should pay extra attention to using the references from credible sources. --Bl2240 (talk) 08:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Bl2240, Nice source added. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

1. I found an article about electronic business which is related to the topic of my research paper. After reviewing the article, I found it still has room to improve such as the lack of images and references, the content also can be improved as well. 2. Here is the link to my article evaluation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jw6740/Evaluate_an_Article 3. What I learned from this process is the importance of the peer view of any article that will be published for others to look at. With more evaluations, the article can be improved to a more accurate level. Jw6740 (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Jw6740, Nice overview. Current with Week 2. FULBERT (talk) 15:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

1. I added a citation about the commentary to the novel. It roughly describes the social and historical background reflected in the story and thus brings changes to the protagonist, making a protagonist with clear thoughts persecuted and assimilated due to social decay. It was also a chilling instance of the era.

2. Here is the link to the diff of what citation I added.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Madman%27s_Diary&type=revision&diff=1052388228&oldid=1051512079

3. From this task, I found that adding citations can enhance the persuasions and make the language more authoritative and powerful. At the same time, it also increases readers' clearer and deeper understanding of the article. --Nenenie (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Nenenie, Nice addition. Remember, try to write in an encyclopedia tone, which means avoid conversation or what may be perceived as biased language. Overall, fine. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 15:28, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

1.my copyedited article is: Steinhardt, N. (2019). Chinese architecture : A history. Princeton University Press. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2193647558/$N?accountid=12768&forcedol=true&forcedol=true 2.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chinese_architecture&diff=1052774604&oldid=1052686089 3.At first I was nervous, I was afraid that I would make some mistakes, like grammatical errors. But I am happy when I finished. For me, I like ancient Chinese architecture very much. Let more people to have a deeper understanding of ancient Chinese architecture. I think it's great!Cloi929 (talk) 06:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Cloi929, This source is good though it points to a database. Can you fix it so it points to the book's ISBN? This involves only editing that one source you inserted. Ping me here when you are finished and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, this is Kyle.

1: The article I copyedited is "Plyometrics". Here is the link to my assigned article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyometrics

2: I have some grammar mistakes in the article to help improve the readability. This is my diff link:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plyometrics&diff=1052448972&oldid=1034084692

3: The reason I am doing this article is that I go to the gym regularly and I have tried different training methods and menus. Plyometrics is definitely one of the essential movements that one needs to add to his or her workout routine if he or she wants to pursue higher athleticism.

4: The link for the article "Plyometrics" bibliography: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Notkc01/Plyometrics/Bibliography Notkc01 (talk) 06:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Notkc01, Nice edit. Current with Week 3. FULBERT (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi guys, this is Kyle.

1. The article I assigned is "split jump". The link to the article：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_jump_(exercise)

2. This article is very short and there is no citation on it. In order to make people who want to have a deeper understanding of this exercise and its pros and cons, I feel like I need to add some citations. I added one sentence to the article to help elaborate the usage of a certain type of exercise and I also cited a journal article to help increase the credibility. Here is the diff-link of my revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Split_jump_(exercise)&diff=1052457297&oldid=744899863

3. Here is the assigned link to the bibliography: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Notkc01/Split_jump_(exercise)/Bibliography Notkc01 (talk) 07:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Notkc01, Nice edit. Current with Week 4. FULBERT (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

I have chosen an article relevant to the travel business as I am passionate about this topic. I have read this article and went through it to see if there are any mistakes. However, it was hard for me to try to find something in a professional article at the beginning. I have realized a couple of pronunciation and grammar mistakes. I edited and modified all of the mistakes I found and published the changes. Here is the article link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_on_cruise_ships

And also my bibliography page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SABA90S/COVID-19_pandemic_on_cruise_ships/Bibliography. --SABA90S (talk) 14:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

SABA90S, Please provide the diff per WP:DIFF to your change and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 17:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

FULBERT, Please see the below link of the diff. --SABA90S (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_on_cruise_ships&diff=1051278608&oldid=1051271324

SABA90S, I am not sure how you got the coding around your reply, though next time please just use " : " with replies. This is fine, though did you see the change that was then done with your edits? It is fine for this week (current with Week 3) though Wikipedia articles maintain either British or American English within an article, however it was initially written, for consistency. Good enough for now. --- FULBERT (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

1.The article that I choose was "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the food industry". This is currently a level C article and needs many improvements. The classification of countries could be more organized. The data and the situation of many countries can be improved. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BaixinH/Evaluate_an_Article 3. I learned that to write a good article, many factors need to be considered, including content, typesetting, structure and neutral of the article, which will affect the quality of the article.BaixinH (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

BaixinH, Nice review. You are current. FULBERT (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

1. My copyedited article is the "Sina Weibo".this is the link to my assigned article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sina_Weibo 2. I correct and error and add the current situation of some company.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sina_Weibo&type=revision&diff=1052620283&oldid=1049343540 3. The lesson I learned is that Wiki is a free and public knowledge platform, we should be careful when we read and edit it. It is our responsibility to take care of the content we write. So I need to check the information through many resource.BaixinH (talk) 06:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

BaixinH, Nice edit. Week3 is current. FULBERT (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)