Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus clip
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Circlip. Shimeru 06:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jesus clip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A topic that doesn't assert notability through any reliable-sources. Wizard191 (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Circlip, whichthis seems to be a synonym for Circlip.[1] First Light (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge first sentence, and only sourced text, to Circlip, per Wizard191 and Andy Dingley (below). First Light (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Added 3 sources. Edison (talk) 20:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this a reliable source? Wizard191 (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No. In addition, the mountain bike reference actually has as the definition of "Jesus Clip" as "(see circlip)".[2] The slang dictionary reference essentially says that it's a slang term, not a neologism. The first sentence of the article is the only part that is referenced. This could arguably be a one-sentence stub on a slang term, but then it would be going up against WP:DICDEF. First Light (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the referenced sentence into Circlip. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to a named section in circlip, preserving a redirect. Although there are a few of these aren't circlips, the vast majority are and the humorous naming isn't really enough to stand as an article. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.