User talk:KhndzorUtogh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Republic of Artsakh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Republic of Artsakh was changed by KhndzorUtogh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914421 on 2021-04-06T13:22:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Armenian Caucus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. Please be aware of this notice. Parishan (talk) 21:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It is very unfortunate to see you engage in edit warring and modify consensus versions of articles without discussing them first. As if this was not enough, you go on to claim that I have a "responsibility" to justify to you why your non-consensus edit-warring version is not acceptable. The IWPR article is literally cited next to the sentence you are editing and if you could just take a moment to see what you are actually arguing against, instead of edit-warring, you would see for yourself what the article says: "Few Armenians know that dozens of Azerbaijanis died fleeing Armenia in 1988-89 - in Armenia the story is that the Azerbaijani minority's departure was peaceful. And while a beautiful 18th century mosque has recently been restored in Yerevan, few of its citizens recall that a small Azerbaijani mosque on what is now Vardanants Street was demolished by a bulldozer in 1990." The passage from De Waal you are citing is not acceptable because there is a difference between quoting and reporting. De Waal offers no report as to Azerbaijan destroying anything, he is just quoting a distressed Armenian citizen he runs into on the street, who is obviously not a reliable source. Parishan (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove the quotes section and the article should be passed no problem.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albert Hovhannisyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Albert Hovhannisyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Hovhannisyan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:27, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Citation Barnstar
	For your great work on the battle of Sardarabad, with which the article was featured on the main page's OTD section. Good luck with your editing journey :) - Kevo327 (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Erciş. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Uness232 (talk) 19:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arman Tsarukyan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 23:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KhndzorUtogh, Good day. Pls note that the subject was born in Georgia and moved to Russia and became citizen of Russia. He heritage /ethnicity is Armenia but we dont put his blood background/ethnicity in the lead section and it doesnt matter he raised the Amenia flag or he said he represent Armenia or any other counties - we merely state the nationality of the subject - see WP:ETHNICITY. You can see it has been stated many times in the edit summary in the article history page. The ethnicity can be stated in the body text in background or personal info section as long as it is supported by independent, reliable source. Cassiopeia talk 00:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khachakirner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Armenian POWs of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Armenian POWs of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the case, I don't edit with IP. Thank you for the message @RoySmith: KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khachakirner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Halidzor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

A b r v a g l ^(PingMe) 17:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Baku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Agop Dilâçar

added a link pointing to Springer

Armenians in Turkey

added a link pointing to Springer

Atatürk's reforms

added a link pointing to Springer

Hagop

added a link pointing to Springer

Turkish Language Association

added a link pointing to Springer

Turkish alphabet

added a link pointing to Springer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please calm down and assume good faith. all humanity is brother, armenians and turks are brothers. ----modern_primat ��ඞඞ TALK 15:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Interfase (talk) 19:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider following this instead of randomly placing it on my talk page KhndzorUtogh (talk) 17:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maraga massacre memorial in Nor Maragha.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 19:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A user continues to erroneously add extra details regarding places of birth for Davit Ishkhanyan, Grigory Martirosyan, and Samvel Shahramanyan. Seems they are edit warring now, I've left a warning on talk but no reply. Letting you know since I saw you also had to revert them. Archives908 (talk) 23:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, will take action if their behavior isn't rectified. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 02:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey, based on your activity i thought i'd let you know that WikiProject Artsakh is being revived due to recent events - thank you for your contributions! Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is KhndzorUtogh. Thank you. Brandmeister^talk 21:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KU. The above AE discussion was closed without any sanction toward you. Please be more cautious around edit warring in all areas, and particularly so in contentious topic areas. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is KhndzorUtogh. Thank you. Aredoros87 (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

• You are warned not to engage in battleground editing and to ensure that you engage construtively with consensus building process.
• Indefinite interaction ban from Aredoros87 which applies everywhere on Wikipedia.
• Indefinitie restriction that requires you to obtain consensus to readd any content (except for things covered by these exemptions) that has been reverted in any article related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, and related ethnic conflicts, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:39, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KhndzorUtogh. There is an Arbitration Enforcement request that involves you: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#KhndzorUtogh. Parishan (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KhndzorUtogh. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.
Message added 03:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again KU. The recent AE filing against you has been closed with no sanctions. Per the agreement of the responding admins, including me, you are advised to self-revert when a possible restriction violation is identified (even if it's in a grey area), and cautioned that a pattern of such lapses, even with self-reverts, will result in a tightening of sanctions. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KhndzorUtogh. Per the administrators' decision, I have been advised to ask you to revert yourself here as your edit is in violation of your arbitration enforcement sanction. Parishan (talk) 03:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parishan, and thank you for following the advice. Could you be more specific about how that edit was a violation? Presumably you've already found the prior edit in which KU added the same content and the intervening edit where it was reverted. Sharing those cuts down on duplicate effort. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Here is the sequence:

1. 1 January 2024 The sentence "Azerbaijan regains control of all of Nagorno-Karabakh" is added by Anime King;
2. 3 January 2024 KhndzorUtogh changes "regains" to "takes";
3. 5 January 2024 I change "takes" back to "regains";
4. 18 January 2024 KhndzorUtogh changes "regains" to "takes" again.

There has been a discussion in progress since 3 January 2024 and no consensus has been reached so far. Parishan (talk) 03:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Don't know how I missed that it was the diff from the AE request. Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your recent edit which undid the addition of flags from the infobox of the Republic of Artsakh page. You cited MOS:INFOBOXFLAG as grounds for this change, but after reviewing the article I could not find any reasoning that would support it's removal. Could you please explain your reasoning behind the change? Thanks. - Nintentoad125 (talk) 07:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nintentoad125: "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes" with the exceptions usually being sporting events. --KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However, almost every good page that has a "preceded and succeeded by" section uses the flags. Here is some examples:

• Soviet Union
• Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic
• Irish Free State

These are all big pages that use flags in the appropriate sections. - Nintentoad125 (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nintentoad125: with all due respect, this is just whataboutism. The guideline is that flags are generally not included, and there hasn't been any consensus for how flags would be an improvement. The Soviet Union has far more states listed, which arguably makes the flag a visual improvement, but it is not one here. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KhndzorUtogh: I understand your point. I just don't see any clear cut non-conflicting guidelines on this topic. It would be helpful if we could get a larger consensus for more editors on this issue. - 🇮🇪 Signed, Nintentoad125 👻 (Talk to me! 🗣️) 07:45, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KhndzorUtogh. The Arbitration Enforcement discussion you started has now been closed. Per the consensus of the responding administrators, I'm advising you that it would be beneficial if we saw a little less of you at AE, either as a filer or a subject. Please don't take this as discouragement from filing clear and urgent requests for enforcement, but if you're not sure, then it would be best to let others consider if AE is needed. Please continue to respect your own sanctions and follow best practices for content and conduct resolution. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Since you were closely monitoring my edits, I wanted to notify you that the same IP address is making similar disruptive reverts. I would appreciate it if you could revert those changes using your extended confirmation. Special:Contributions/93.199.244.40 Göycen (talk) 09:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear KhndzorUtogh. There is an issue on Wikidata, and I thought you could help me with it. One user is changing the Armenian name of the Q158903 settlement to Shusha on Wikidata, whereas in Armenian, the settlement is called Shushi. Can you tell me what the regulations are on this matter, according to Wikipedia policy/rules? You can see the discussion here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Interfase#Armenian_names. Thank you! Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 02:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ավետիսյան91 Hi Ավետիսյան jan. I don't know about the Wikidata policies, but the name in Armenian as you said is clearly Shushi, that's a fact. If the user still edits inappropriately, perhaps you should report them to the Wikidata admins. Hope this helps. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 08:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[1] removed the RfC section and template, can you fix it? Bogazicili (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bogazicili I'd be glad to, but I just posted my comment, I don't think I did anything to the template. Do you now how to fix it? KhndzorUtogh (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undo your edit, and manually re-add it, fixing indents. Use "edit source" on top of the section, rather than reply function. Bogazicili (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]