Compatibility of Hodge Theory on Alexander Modules. arXiv:2401.01209
Preprint, arXiv:2401.01209 [math.AG] (2024).
Summary: Let \(U\) be a smooth connected complex algebraic variety, and let \(f\colon U\to \mathbb C^*\) be an algebraic map. To the pair \((U,f)\) one can associate an infinite cyclic cover \(U^f\), and (homology) Alexander modules are defined as the homology groups of this cover. In two recent works, the first of which is joint with Geske, Maxim and Wang, we developed two different ways to put a mixed Hodge structure on Alexander modules. Since they are not finite dimensional in general, each approach replaces the Alexander module by a different finite dimensional module: one of them takes the torsion submodule, the other takes finite dimensional quotients, and the constructions are not directly comparable. In this note, we show that both constructions are compatible, in the sense that the map from the torsion to the quotients is a mixed Hodge structure morphism.
MSC:
14C30 | Transcendental methods, Hodge theory (algebro-geometric aspects) |
14D07 | Variation of Hodge structures (algebro-geometric aspects) |
14F40 | de Rham cohomology and algebraic geometry |
14F45 | Topological properties in algebraic geometry |
32S35 | Mixed Hodge theory of singular varieties (complex-analytic aspects) |
32S40 | Monodromy; relations with differential equations and \(D\)-modules (complex-analytic aspects) |
32S50 | Topological aspects of complex singularities: Lefschetz theorems, topological classification, invariants |
32S55 | Milnor fibration; relations with knot theory |
55N25 | Homology with local coefficients, equivariant cohomology |
55N30 | Sheaf cohomology in algebraic topology |
arXiv data are taken from the
arXiv OAI-PMH API.
If you found a mistake, please
report it directly to arXiv.