Summary: Aggregating data in a database could also be called ”integrating along fibers”: given functions \(\pi\colon E\to D\) and \(s\colon E\to R\), where \((R,\circledast)\) is a commutative monoid, we want a new function \((\circledast s)_\pi\) that sends each \(d\in D\) to the ”sum” of all \(s(e)\) for which \(\pi(e)=d\). The operation lives alongside querying – or more generally data migration – in typical database usage: one wants to know how much Canadians spent on cell phones in 2021, for example, and such requests typically require both aggregation and querying. But whereas querying has an elegant category-theoretic treatment in terms of parametric right adjoints between copresheaf categories, a categorical formulation of aggregation – especially one that lives alongside that for querying – appears to be completely absent from the literature. In this paper we show how both querying and aggregation fit into the ”polynomial ecosystem”. Starting with the category \(\mathbf{Poly}\) of polynomial functors in one variable, we review the relatively recent results of Ahman-Uustalu and Garner, which showed that the framed bicategory \(\mathbb{C}\mathbf{at}^\sharp\) of comonads in \(\mathbf{Poly}\) is precisely the right setting for data migration: its objects are categories and its bicomodules are parametric right adjoints between their copresheaf categories. We then develop a great deal of theory, compressed for space reasons, including local monoidal closed structures, a coclosure to bicomodule composition, and an understanding of adjoints in \(\mathbb{C}\mathbf{at}^\sharp\). Doing so allows us to derive interesting mathematical results, e.g.that the ordinary operation of transposing a span can be decomposed into the composite of two more primitive operations, and then finally to explain how aggregation arises, alongside querying, in \(\mathbb{C}\mathbf{at}^\sharp\).