×

Sequential optimal truss generator for frequency ranges. (English) Zbl 0633.73096

The concept of an ordered set of optimum designs is introduced here and all the design variables and behavioral variables belonging to the optimum designs are represented by successive piecewise Taylor series. A most natural, direct, and efficient way of generating or sweeping out all the optimum designs sequentially in the set is devised. The procedure is started with the eigenvalue analysis on the truss defined by the set of all the minimum cross-sectional areas. Neither any further eigenvalue analysis nor application of any optimization technique is required in the proposed procedure. It is demonstrated that the proposed method is efficient not only for an ordered set of optimum designs of a large truss associated with the single lowest eigenvector but also for that associated with multiple lowest eigenvectors.

MSC:

74P99 Optimization problems in solid mechanics
65K10 Numerical optimization and variational techniques
74S30 Other numerical methods in solid mechanics (MSC2010)
49K40 Sensitivity, stability, well-posedness
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Venkayya, V. B.; Tischler, V. A., Optimization of structures with frequency constraints, (Computer Methods in Nonlinear Solids Structural Mechanics ASME-AMD-54 (1983), ASME: ASME New York), 239-259 · Zbl 0545.73083
[2] Sheu, C. Y., Elastic minimum weight design for specified fundamental frequency, Internat. J. Solids and Structures, 4, 953-958 (1968)
[3] Venkayya, V. B., Structural optimization: A review and some recommendations, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Engrg., 13, 203-228 (1978) · Zbl 0389.73079
[4] Bellagamba, L.; Yang, T. Y., Minimum mass truss structures with constraints on fundamental natural frequency, AIAA J., 19, 11, 1452-1458 (1981)
[5] Karihaloo, B. L.; Niordson, F. I., Optimum design of vibrating cantilevers, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 11, 6, 638-654 (1973) · Zbl 0245.73038
[6] Olhoff, N., Optimal design with respect to structural eigenvalue, (Proceedings 15th Congress of IUTAM. Proceedings 15th Congress of IUTAM, Toronto (1980)), 133-149 · Zbl 0457.73078
[7] Dobbs, M. W.; Nelson, R. B., Application of optimality criteria to automated structural design, AIAA J., 14, 10, 1436-1443 (1976)
[8] Atrek, E.; Gallagher, R. H.; Ragsdell, K. M.; Zienkiewicz, O. C., New Directions in Optimum Structural Design (1984), Wiley: Wiley New York · Zbl 0649.73039
[9] Taylor, J. E., Minimum mass bar for axial vibration at specified natural frequency, AIAA J., 5, 10, 1911-1913 (1967)
[10] Pierson, B. L., A survey of optimal structural design under dynamic constraints, Internat. Numer. Meths. Engrg., 4, 491-499 (1972)
[11] Miura, H.; Schmit, L. A., 3econd order approximation of natural frequency constraints in structural synthesis, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Engrg., 13, 337-351 (1978) · Zbl 0389.73068
[12] Clough, R. W.; Penzien, J., Dynamics of Structures, ((1975), McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill New York), 544-610 · Zbl 0357.73068
[13] Nakamura, Tsuneyoshi, Optimum Design of Building Frames (1980), Maruzen: Maruzen Tokyo, (in Japanese)
[14] Nakamura, Tsuneyoshi; Ito, H., Optimum design of building frames for specified fundamental period, Part I, Fundamental solution, Part II, Effect of column axial force, (Summaries, 1980 Meeting (1980), Architecture Institute of Japan), 947-950, (in Japanese)
[15] Nakamura, Tsuneyoshi; Yamane, T., Optimum design for specified fundamental frequency and its application to control of maximum earthquake response, (Summaries, 1983 Meeting (1983), Architecture Institute of Japan), 1041-1042, (in Japanese)
[16] Nakamura, Tsuneyoshi; Yamane, T., Optimum design and earthquake-response constrained design of elastic shear buildings, Earthquake Engrg. Structural Dynamics, 14, 5, 797-815 (1986)
[17] Schmit, L. A.; Chang, K. J., Optimum design sensitivity based on approximation concepts and dual method, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Engrg., 20, 39-75 (1984) · Zbl 0524.73095
[18] Adelman, H. M.; Haftka, R. T., Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems, AIAA J., 24, 5, 823-832 (1986)
[19] Vanderplaats, G. N.; Yoshida, N., Efficient calculation of optimum design sensitivity, AIAA J., 23, 11, 1798-1803 (1985) · Zbl 0577.73091
[20] Sobieszanski-Sobieski, J.; Barthelemy, J.; Riley, K. M., Sensitivity of optimum solutions of problem parameters, AIAA J., 20, 9, 1291-1299 (1982) · Zbl 0518.73084
[21] Barthelemy, J.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Optimum sensitivity derivatives of objective functions in nonlinear programming, AIAA J., 21, 6, 913-915 (1983) · Zbl 0534.90084
[22] Barthelemy, J.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Extrapolation of optimum design based on sensitivity derivatives, AIAA J., 21, 5, 797-799 (1983)
[23] Vanderplaats, G. N., An efficient feasible directions algorithm for design synthesis, AIAA J., 22, 11, 1633-1640 (1984)
[24] Olhoff, N.; Rasmussen, S. H., On single and bimodal optimum buckling loads of clamped columns, Internat. J. Solids and Structures, 13, 605-614 (1977) · Zbl 0357.73041
[25] Masur, E. F., Optimal structural design under multiple eigenvalue constraints, Internat. J. Solids and Structures, 20, 3, 211-231 (1984) · Zbl 0544.73117
[26] Khot, N. S., Optimization of structures with multiple frequency constraints, Comput. & Structures, 20, 5, 869-876 (1985) · Zbl 0565.73078
[27] Prager, W.; Taylor, J. E., Problems of optimal structural design, J. Appl. Mech., 35, 102-106 (1968) · Zbl 0155.52003
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.