×

Partially Bayesian active learning cubature for structural reliability analysis with extremely small failure probabilities. (English) Zbl 1539.62303

Summary: The Bayesian failure probability inference (BFPI) framework provides a well-established Bayesian approach to quantifying our epistemic uncertainty about the failure probability resulting from a limited number of performance function evaluations. However, it is still challenging to perform Bayesian active learning of the failure probability by taking advantage of the BFPI framework. In this work, three Bayesian active learning methods are proposed under the name ‘partially Bayesian active learning cubature’ (PBALC), based on a cleaver use of the BFPI framework for structural reliability analysis, especially when small failure probabilities are involved. Since the posterior variance of the failure probability is computationally expensive to evaluate, the underlying idea is to exploit only the posterior mean of the failure probability to design two critical components for Bayesian active learning, i.e., the stopping criterion and the learning function. On this basis, three sets of stopping criteria and learning functions are proposed, resulting in the three proposed methods PBALC1, PBALC2 and PBALC3. Furthermore, the analytically intractable integrals involved in the stopping criteria are properly addressed from a numerical point of view. Five numerical examples are studied to demonstrate the performance of the three proposed methods. It is found empirically that the proposed methods can assess very small failure probabilities and significantly outperform several existing methods in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

MSC:

62N05 Reliability and life testing
62F15 Bayesian inference
65C05 Monte Carlo methods

Software:

AK-MCS

References:

[1] Kurtz, N.; Song, J., Cross-entropy-based adaptive importance sampling using Gaussian mixture, Struct. Saf., 42, 35-44, 2013
[2] Papaioannou, I.; Papadimitriou, C.; Straub, D., Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis, Struct. Saf., 62, 66-75, 2016
[3] Au, S.-K.; Beck, J. L., Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation, Probab. Eng. Mech., 16, 4, 263-277, 2001
[4] Au, S.-K.; Wang, Y., Engineering Risk Assessment with Subset Simulation, 2014, John Wiley & Sons
[5] Bjerager, P., Probability integration by directional simulation, J. Eng. Mech., 114, 8, 1285-1302, 1988
[6] Nie, J.; Ellingwood, B. R., Directional methods for structural reliability analysis, Struct. Saf., 22, 3, 233-249, 2000
[7] Koutsourelakis, P.-S.; Pradlwarter, H. J.; Schueller, G. I., Reliability of structures in high dimensions, part I: algorithms and applications, Probab. Eng. Mech., 19, 4, 409-417, 2004
[8] Breitung, K. W., Asymptotic Approximations for Probability Integrals, 2006, Springer
[9] Hasofer, A. M.; Lind, N. C., Exact and invariant second-moment code format, J. Eng. Mech. Div., 100, 1, 111-121, 1974
[10] Breitung, K., Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals, J. Eng. Mech., 110, 3, 357-366, 1984
[11] Zhao, Y.-G.; Ono, T., Moment methods for structural reliability, Struct. Saf., 23, 1, 47-75, 2001
[12] Xu, J.; Dang, C., A new bivariate dimension reduction method for efficient structural reliability analysis, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 115, 281-300, 2019
[13] Zhang, X.; Pandey, M. D., Structural reliability analysis based on the concepts of entropy, fractional moment and dimensional reduction method, Struct. Saf., 43, 28-40, 2013
[14] Xu, J.; Kong, F., Adaptive scaled unscented transformation for highly efficient structural reliability analysis by maximum entropy method, Struct. Saf., 76, 123-134, 2019
[15] Li, J.; Chen, J.-b.; Fan, W.-l., The equivalent extreme-value event and evaluation of the structural system reliability, Struct. Saf., 29, 2, 112-131, 2007
[16] Gao, K.; Liu, G.; Tang, W., High-dimensional reliability analysis based on the improved number-theoretical method, Appl. Math. Model., 107, 151-164, 2022 · Zbl 1503.60089
[17] Li, X.; Chen, G.; Cui, H.; Yang, D., Direct probability integral method for static and dynamic reliability analysis of structures with complicated performance functions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 374, Article 113583 pp., 2021 · Zbl 1506.74485
[18] Chen, G.; Yang, D., A unified analysis framework of static and dynamic structural reliabilities based on direct probability integral method, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 158, Article 107783 pp., 2021
[19] Bichon, B. J.; Eldred, M. S.; Swiler, L. P.; Mahadevan, S.; McFarland, J. M., Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA J., 46, 10, 2459-2468, 2008
[20] Echard, B.; Gayton, N.; Lemaire, M., AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation, Struct. Saf., 33, 2, 145-154, 2011
[21] Briol, F.-X.; Oates, C. J.; Girolami, M.; Osborne, M. A.; Sejdinovic, D., Probabilistic integration: A role in statistical computation?, Statist. Sci., 34, 1, 1-22, 2019 · Zbl 1420.62135
[22] Dang, C.; Wei, P.; Song, J.; Beer, M., Estimation of failure probability function under imprecise probabilities by active learning-augmented probabilistic integration, ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. A, 7, 4, Article 04021054 pp., 2021
[23] Dang, C.; Wei, P.; Faes, M. G.; Valdebenito, M. A.; Beer, M., Parallel adaptive Bayesian quadrature for rare event estimation, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 225, Article 108621 pp., 2022
[24] Dang, C.; Valdebenito, M. A.; Faes, M. G.; Wei, P.; Beer, M., Structural reliability analysis: A Bayesian perspective, Struct. Saf., 99, Article 102259 pp., 2022
[25] Hu, Z.; Dang, C.; Wang, L.; Beer, M., Parallel Bayesian probabilistic integration for structural reliability analysis with small failure probabilities, Struct. Saf., 106, Article 102409 pp., 2024
[26] Dang, C.; Valdebenito, M. A.; Song, J.; Wei, P.; Beer, M., Estimation of small failure probabilities by partially Bayesian active learning line sampling: Theory and algorithm, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 412, Article 116068 pp., 2023 · Zbl 1539.62015
[27] Dang, C.; Valdebenito, M. A.; Faes, M. G.; Song, J.; Wei, P.; Beer, M., Structural reliability analysis by line sampling: A Bayesian active learning treatment, Struct. Saf., 104, Article 102351 pp., 2023
[28] Wei, P.; Tang, C.; Yang, Y., Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of extremely rare failure events by combining sampling and surrogate model methods, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O, 233, 6, 943-957, 2019
[29] Yang, X.; Liu, Y.; Mi, C.; Wang, X., Active learning Kriging model combining with kernel-density-estimation-based importance sampling method for the estimation of low failure probability, J. Mech. Des., 140, 5, Article 051402 pp., 2018
[30] Bect, J.; Li, L.; Vazquez, E., Bayesian subset simulation, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif., 5, 1, 762-786, 2017 · Zbl 06861829
[31] Bucher, C. G.; Bourgund, U., A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems, Struct. Saf., 7, 1, 57-66, 1990
[32] Huang, B.; Du, X., Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and saddlepoint approximations, J. Mech. Des., 128, 1, 26-33, 2005
[33] Dang, C.; Wei, P.; Faes, M. G.; Beer, M., Bayesian probabilistic propagation of hybrid uncertainties: Estimation of response expectation function, its variable importance and bounds, Comput. Struct., 270, Article 106860 pp., 2022
[34] Marelli, S.; Schöbi, R.; Sudret, B., UQLab User Manual - Structural Reliability (Rare Event Estimation)Tech. Rep., 2022, Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich: Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification, ETH Zurich Switzerland, Report UQLab-V2.0-107
[35] Valdebenito, M. A.; Jensen, H. A.; Hernández, H.; Mehrez, L., Sensitivity estimation of failure probability applying line sampling, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 171, 99-111, 2018
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.