×

Direct probability integral method for static and dynamic reliability analysis of structures with complicated performance functions. (English) Zbl 1506.74485

Summary: For structural reliability assessment, some performance functions are fairly complicated, which leads to disjoint failure domains, discontinuous structural responses and multiple design points. Thus, such a problem is difficult to be solved by some existing methods, i.e., the design point-based methods and surrogate model-based methods, etc. Although the stochastic sampling-based methods can tackle this issue, much computational effort is needed. In this paper, a novel approach, direct probability integral method (DPIM), is proposed to address static and dynamic reliability assessment for structures with complicated performance functions. The DPIM is established based on the decoupled computation of probability density integral equation and structural physical equation. Firstly, by introducing the point selection technique based on generalized F discrepancy and the smoothing of Dirac delta function, the probability density integral equation is solved directly to calculate the probability density functions (PDFs) of static and dynamic responses of structures with complicated performance functions. Then, the failure probability for static system is acquired by integrating the PDF curve of structural response over failure domain. For stochastic dynamic system, the dynamic reliability assessment is fulfilled efficiently by DPIM combining with extreme value distribution. Finally, six representative examples indicate that DPIM is much more efficient than Monte Carlo simulation to attack the reliability estimation issue of structures containing complicated performance functions.

MSC:

74S60 Stochastic and other probabilistic methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
60K10 Applications of renewal theory (reliability, demand theory, etc.)
62N05 Reliability and life testing
65C20 Probabilistic models, generic numerical methods in probability and statistics

Software:

AK-MCS
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Schueller, G. I., Computational stochastic mechanics - recent advances, Comput. Struct., 79, 2225-2234 (2001)
[2] Roy, C. J.; Oberkampf, W. L., A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 200, 2131-2144 (2011) · Zbl 1230.76049
[3] Liu, Z. J.; Liu, W.; Peng, Y. B., Random function based spectral representation of stationary and non-stationary stochastic processes, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 45, 115-126 (2016)
[4] Stefanou, G.; Savvas, D.; Papadrakakis, M., Stochastic finite element analysis of composite structures based on mesoscale random fields of material properties, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 326, 319-337 (2017) · Zbl 1439.74237
[5] Chen, G. H.; Yang, D. X., Direct probability integral method for stochastic response analysis of static and dynamic structural systems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 357, Article 112612 pp. (2019) · Zbl 1442.65004
[6] Keshtegar, B.; Meng, Z., A hybrid relaxed first-order reliability method for efficient structural reliability analysis, Struct. Saf., 66, 84-93 (2017)
[7] Melchers, R. E., Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction (2018), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Chichester
[8] Youn, B. D.; Choi, K. K.; Yang, R. J.; Gu, L., Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 26, 272-283 (2004)
[9] Keshtegar, B.; Lee, I., Relaxed performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 54, 1439-1454 (2016)
[10] Jiang, C.; Fang, T.; Wang, Z. X.; Wei, X. P.; Huang, Z. L., A general solution framework for time-variant reliability based design optimization, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 323, 330-352 (2017) · Zbl 1439.74253
[11] Li, X. L.; Meng, Z.; Chen, G. H.; Yang, D. X., A hybrid self-adjusted single-loop approach for reliability-based design optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 60, 1867-1885 (2019)
[12] Rahman, S.; Xu, H., A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 19, 393-408 (2004)
[13] Xiong, F. F.; Greene, S.; Chen, W.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, S. X., A new sparse grid based method for uncertainty propagation, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 41, 335-349 (2010) · Zbl 1274.65069
[14] He, W. X.; Zeng, Y.; Li, G., A novel structural reliability analysis method via improved maximum entropy method based on nonlinear mapping and sparse grid numerical integration, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 133, Article 106247 pp. (2019)
[15] Olsson, A.; Sandberg, G.; Dahlblom, O., On latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis, Struct. Saf., 25, 47-68 (2003)
[16] Schueller, G. I.; Pradlwarter, H. J.; Koutsourelakis, P. S., A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions, Probab. Eng. Mech., 19, 463-474 (2004)
[17] Au, S. K.; Beck, J. L., Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation, Probab. Eng. Mech., 16, 263-277 (2001)
[18] Roussouly, N.; Petitjean, F.; Salaun, M., A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis, Probab. Eng. Mech., 32, 103-115 (2013)
[19] Blatman, G.; Sudret, B., An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis, Probab. Eng. Mech., 25, 183-197 (2010)
[20] Hurtado, J. E., An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory, Struct. Saf., 26, 271-293 (2004)
[21] Bourinet, J. M.; Deheeger, F.; Lemaire, M., Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines, Struct. Saf., 33, 343-353 (2011)
[22] Chojaczyk, A. A.; Teixeira, A. P.; Neves, L. C.; Cardoso, J. B.; Guedes Soares, C., Review and application of artificial neural networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures, Struct. Saf., 52, 78-89 (2015)
[23] Echard, B.; Gayton, N.; Lemaire, M., AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining kriging and monte carlo simulation, Struct. Saf., 33, 145-154 (2011)
[24] Gaspar, B.; Teixeira, A. P.; Guedes Soares, C., Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining kriging and a trust region method, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 165, 277-291 (2017)
[25] Jiang, C.; Qiu, H. B.; Yang, Z.; Chen, L. M.; Gao, L.; Li, P. G., A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 183, 47-59 (2019)
[26] Lee, T. H.; Jung, J. J., A sampling technique enhancing accuracy and efficiency of metamodel-based RBDO: Constraint boundary sampling, Comput. Struct., 86, 1463-1476 (2008)
[27] Keshtegar, B.; Kisi, O., M5 model tree and Monte Carlo simulation for efficient structural reliability analysis, Appl. Math. Model., 48, 899-910 (2017) · Zbl 1480.74286
[28] Kang, F.; Li, J. S.; Wang, Y.; Li, J., Extreme learning machine-based surrogate model for analyzing system reliability of soil slopes, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., 21, 1341-1362 (2017)
[29] Basudhar, A.; Missoum, S.; Sanchez, A. H., Limit state function identification using support vector machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 23, 1-11 (2008)
[30] Basudhar, A.; Missoum, S., Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines, Comput. Struct., 86, 1904-1917 (2008)
[31] Patel, J.; Choi, S. K., Classification approach for reliability-based topology optimization using probabilistic neural networks, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 45, 529-543 (2012) · Zbl 1274.74376
[32] Der Kiureghian, A.; Dakessian, T., Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability, Struct. Saf., 20, 37-49 (1998)
[33] Kim, J.; Song, J., Probability-adaptive Kriging in n-ball (PAK-Bn) for reliability analysis, Struct. Saf., 85, Article 101924 pp. (2020)
[34] Wang, Y. T.; Hao, P.; Guo, Z. D.; Liu, D. C.; Gao, Q., Reliability-based design optimization of complex problems with multiple design points via narrowed search region, J. Mech. Design., 142, Article 061702 pp. (2020)
[35] Yang, D. X., Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 15, 3131-3141 (2010) · Zbl 1222.65094
[36] Meng, Z.; Li, G.; Yang, D. X.; Zhan, L. C., A new directional stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability analysis, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 55, 601-612 (2017)
[37] Keshtegar, B.; Miri, M., Reliability analysis of corroded pipes using conjugate HL-RF algorithm based on average shear stress yield criterion, Eng. Fail. Anal., 46, 104-117 (2014)
[38] Keshtegar, B., A hybrid conjugate finite-step length method for robust and efficient reliability analysis, Appl. Math. Model., 45, 226-237 (2017) · Zbl 1446.90019
[39] Keshtegar, B.; Chakraborty, S., A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis, Appl. Math. Model., 53, 319-332 (2018) · Zbl 1480.74247
[40] Chen, Z. Z.; Wu, Z. H.; Li, X. K.; Chen, G.; Gao, L.; Gan, X. H.; Chen, G. F.; Wang, S. Z., A multiple-design-point approach for reliability-based design optimization, Eng. Optim., 51, 875-895 (2019)
[41] Valdebenito, M. A.; Jensen, H. A.; Labarca, A. A., Estimation of first excursion probabilities for uncertain stochastic linear systems subject to Gaussian load, Comput. Struct., 138, 36-48 (2014)
[42] Li, H. S.; Wang, T.; Yuan, J. Y.; Zhang, H., A sampling-based method for high-dimensional time-variant reliability analysis, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 126, 505-520 (2019)
[43] Crandall, S. H., First-crossing probabilities of the linear oscillator, J. Sound. Vib., 12, 285-299 (1970) · Zbl 0195.54504
[44] Spencer, B. F.; Elishakoff, I., Reliability of uncertain linear and nonlinear systems, J. Eng. Mech., 114, 135-148 (1988)
[45] Chen, J. B.; Li, J., The extreme value distribution and dynamic reliability analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters, Struct. Saf., 29, 77-93 (2007)
[46] Li, J.; Chen, J. B., Stochastic Dynamics of Structures (2009), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons Singapore · Zbl 1170.74003
[47] Chen, J. B.; Yang, J. Y.; Li, J., A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters, Struct. Saf., 59, 20-31 (2016)
[48] Silverman, B. W., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (1998), CRC Press: CRC Press Boca Raton · Zbl 0617.62042
[49] Goodfellow, I.; Bengio, Y.; Courville, A., Deep Learning (2016), MIT Press: MIT Press Boston · Zbl 1373.68009
[50] Wei, D.; Rahman, S., A multi-point univariate decomposition method for structural reliability analysis, Int. J. Press. Ves. Pip., 87, 220-229 (2010)
[51] Amin, M.; Ang, A. H.S., Non-stationary stochastic model of earthquake motion, J. Eng. Mech. Division-ASCE, 94, 559-583 (1968)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.