×

Environmental efficiency, irreversibility and the shadow price of emissions. (English) Zbl 1541.91201

Summary: Assessing the production of goods and services while minimizing the damage to the environment is a key component to advance sustainable development at national and global levels. The nonparametric estimation of lower and upper bounds on shadow prices of pollutants is undertaken to support the design of policies promoting environmental efficiency in the presence of asymmetry in adjusting productive and abatement capital capacity. This framework is applied to the pulp and paper sector of 39 countries for 1996–2009, and finds that the USA, China and Ireland are the most environmentally inefficient countries in the pulp and paper sector. The adjustment costs associated with net investment and disinvestment are found to be asymmetric. For those nations where the shadow price of CO\(_2\) is lower than the carbon tax, there is still an opportunity to abate emissions further. Results on complementarity or substitutability between pollutants are in general inconclusive.

MSC:

91B76 Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives

References:

[1] Akpan, U. S.; Green, O. A.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Isihak, S., Effect of technology change on CO_2 emissions in Japan’s Industrial Sectors in the Period 1995-2005: An input-output structural decomposition analysis, Environmental and Resource Economics, 61, 165-189 (2015)
[2] Ambec, S.; Coria, J., Prices vs quantities with multiple pollutants, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 123-140 (2013)
[3] Beavis, B., Optimal pollution in the presence of adjustment costs, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 6, 1-10 (1979) · Zbl 0397.90030
[4] Bostian, M.; Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lundgren, T., Environmental investment and firm performance: A network approach, Energy Economics, 57, 243-255 (2016)
[5] Brӓnnlund, R.; Chung, Y.; Fӓre, R.; Grosskopf, S., Emissions trading and profitability: The Swedish pulp and paper industry, Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 345-356 (1998)
[6] Chambers, R. G.; Serra, T.; Lansink, A. Oude, On the pricing of undesirable state-contingent outputs, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41, 485-509 (2014)
[7] Chen, C.-M.; van Dalen, J., Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 749-760 (2010) · Zbl 1177.90206
[8] Chung, Y. H.; Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S., Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 229-240 (1997)
[9] Conover, W. J., Practical nonparametric statistics, Wiley series in probability and statistics: Applied probability and statistics section (1999), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
[10] Cooper, R. W.; Haltiwanger, J. C., On the nature of adjustment costs, Review of Economic Studies, 73, 611-633 (2006) · Zbl 1145.91344
[11] Dixit, A.; Pindyck, R. S., Investment under Uncertainty (1994), Princeton University Press
[12] Droege, S. (2013) Carbon pricing and its future role for energy-intensive industries: Key features of steel, cement, aluminium, basic chemicals, pulp and paper, Climate Strategies Synthesis Report, Cambridge, UK.
[13] Elrod, A. A.; Malik, A. S., The Effect of Environmental regulation on plant-level product mix: A study of EPA’s cluster rule, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 164-184 (2017)
[14] Technology brief (2015), 107May
[15] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the pulp and paper manufacturing industry, Sector Policies and Program Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, October 2010.
[16] Fallah-Fini, S.; Triantis, K.; Johnson, A. L., Reviewing the literature on non-parametric dynamic efficiency measurement: State-of-the-art, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 51-67 (2014)
[17] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. A.K.; Pasurka, C., Productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economic and Statistics, 71, 90-98 (1989)
[18] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Lovell, C. A.K.; Yaisawarng, S., Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 2, 374-380 (1993)
[19] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Margaritis, D., Efficiency and productivity: Malmquist and more, (Fried, H. O.; Lovell, C. A.K.; Schmidt, S. S., The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth (2008), Oxford University Press, Inc), 522-621
[20] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Noh, D.-W.; Weber, W., Characteristics of a polluting technology: Theory and practice, Journal of Econometrics, 126, 469-492 (2005) · Zbl 1334.62211
[21] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Weber, W., Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture, Ecological Economics, 56, 89-103 (2006)
[22] Fleiter, T.; Schleich, J.; Ravivanpong, P., Adoption of energy-efficiency measures in SMEs-An empirical analysis based on energy audit data from Germany, Energy Policy, 51, 863-875 (2012)
[23] Forsund, F. R., Economic interpretations of DEA, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 9-15 (2018)
[24] Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) (2014) Non-market-based Approaches, Technical Paper 2014/10, United Nations.
[25] Gary, W. B.; Shadbegian, R. J.; Wang, C.; Meral, M., Do EPA regulations affect labor demand? Evidence from the pulp and paper industry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68, 188-202 (2014)
[26] Hailu, A.; Veeman, T. S., Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: An application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 605-616 (2001)
[27] Hailu, A.; Veeman, T. S., Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994: An input distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, 251-274 (2000) · Zbl 0964.91040
[28] Halkos, G. E.; Tzeremes, N. G., Measuring the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiency in CO2 emissions: an application of conditional full frontiers, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 367-382 (2014)
[29] Harford, J. D., Adjustment costs and optimal waste treatment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, 215-225 (1976)
[30] International Energy Agency (IEA) (2008) Worldwide trends in energy use and efficiency- Key insights from IEA indicator analysis.
[31] Inklaar, R.; Timmer, M. P., The Relative Price of Services, Review of Income and Wealth, 60, 4, 727-746 (2014)
[32] Kao, C., Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis: A Relational Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 325-330 (2013)
[33] Korhonen, P. J.; Luptacik, M., Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 437-446 (2004) · Zbl 1146.91327
[34] Kortelainen, M.; Kuosmanen, T., Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 57-69 (2007)
[35] Kühn, K.-U.; Van Reenen, J., Capacity constraints and irreversible investments: defending against collective dominance UPM Kymmene/Norske/Skog/Haindl, (Lyons, B., Cases in European competition policy: The economic analysis (2009), Cambridge University Press)
[36] Kuosmanen, T.; Kortelainen, M., Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 59-72 (2005)
[37] Kuosmanen, T.; Kortelainen, M.; Sipiläinen, T.; Cherchye, L., Firm and industry level profit efficiency analysis using absolute and uniform shadow prices, European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 584-594 (2010) · Zbl 1179.90111
[38] Lee, J.-D.; Park, J.-B.; Kim, T.-Y., Estimation of shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment inefficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 365-375 (2002)
[39] Lucas, R. E., Adjustment costs and the theory of supply, Journal of Political Economy, 75, 4, 321-334 (1967)
[40] Maynard, L. J.; Shortle, J. S., Determinants of cleaner technology investment in the U.S. bleached Kraft pulp industry, Land Economics, 77, 4, 561-576 (2001)
[41] Mortensen, D., Generalized costs of adjustment and dynamic factor demand theory, Econometrica, 41, 657-666 (1973) · Zbl 0295.90012
[42] Moya, J. A.; Pavel, C. C., Energy efficiency and GHG emissions: prospective scenarios for the pulp and paper industry, Article JRC111652 pp. (2018), Publications Office of the European Union: Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg, EUR 29289 ENISBN 978-92-79-89119-9
[43] Murty, S. (2010) On the theory of a firm: The case of by-production of emissions, the warwick economics research papers series (TWERPS), No. 934.
[44] Murty, S.; Russell, R. R.; Levkoff, S. B., On modeling pollution-generating technologies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64, 117-135 (2012)
[45] Nemoto, J.; Goto, M., Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production; An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 191-210 (2003)
[46] Nicolaï, J.-P., Emission reduction and profit-neutral permit allocations, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 239-253 (2019)
[47] Nielsen, Ø. A.; Schiantarelli, F., Zeros and lumps in investment: Empirical evidence on irreversibilities and nonconvexities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 1021-1037 (2003)
[48] Effective carbon rates: Pricing CO2 through taxes and emissions trading systems (2016), OECD Publishing: OECD Publishing Paris
[49] Oude Lansink, A.; Stefanou, S. E., Asymmetric adjustment of dynamic factors at the firm level, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 4, 1340-1351 (1997)
[50] Ouellette, P.; Yang, L., Investment and dynamic DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29, 235-247 (2008)
[51] Palm, F. C.; Pfann, G. A., Sources of asymmetry in production factor dynamics, Journal of Econometrics, 82, 2, 361-392 (1998) · Zbl 0886.62121
[52] Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; Beltrán-Esteve, M.; Gómez-Limón, J. A., Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions, European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 798-809 (2012) · Zbl 1253.90175
[53] Picazo-Tadeo, A. J.; Gómez-Limón, J. A.; Reig-Martínez, E., Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1154-1164 (2011)
[54] Podinovski, V. V., Direct estimation of marginal characteristics of nonparametric production frontiers in the presence of undesirable outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, 279, 258-276 (2019) · Zbl 1430.90586
[55] Podinovski, V. V.; Chambers, R. G.; Atici, K. B.; Deineko, I. D., Marginal values and returns to scale for nonparametric production frontiers, Operations Research, 64, 1, 236-250 (2016) · Zbl 1336.90052
[56] Ray, S. C.; Mukherjee, K.; Venkatesh, A., Nonparametric measures of efficiency in the presence of undesirable outputs: A by-production approach, Empirical Economics, 54, 1, 31-65 (2018)
[57] Reig-Martínez, E.; Picazo-Tadeo, A.; Hernández-Sancho, F., The calculation of shadow prices for industrial wastes using distance functions: An analysis for Spanish ceramic pavements firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 69, 277-285 (2001)
[58] Rødseth, K. L., Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42, 211-223 (2014)
[59] Rothschild, M., On the cost of adjustment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85, 605-622 (1971) · Zbl 0249.90003
[60] Silva, E.; Lansink, A. Oude; Stefanou, S. E., The adjustment-cost model of the firm: Duality and productive efficiency, International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 245-256 (2015)
[61] Silva, E.; Stefanou, S. E., Dynamic efficiency measurement: Theory and application, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 398-419 (2007)
[62] Silva, E.; Stefanou, S. E., Nonparametric dynamic production analysis and the theory of cost, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 5-32 (2003)
[63] Timmer, M. P.; Dietzenbacher, E.; Los, B.; Stehrer, R.; de Vries, G. J., An illustrated user guide to the world input-output database: The case of global automotive production, Review of International Economics, 23, 3, 575-605 (2015)
[64] Treadway, A., Adjustment Costs and Variable Inputs in the Theory of the Competitive Firm, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 329-347 (1970)
[65] Wiersma, D., Static and dynamic efficiency of pollution control strategies: A case study of SO_2 emissions abatement of the Dutch electricity sector, Environmental and Resource Economics, 1, 63-82 (1991)
[66] Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense (2000), WBCSD: WBCSD Geneva
[67] Xepapadeas, A. P., Environmental policy, adjustment costs, and behavior of the firm, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 23, 258-275 (1992)
[68] Zhou, P.; Zhou, X.; Fan, L. W., On estimating shadow prices of undesirable outputs with efficiency models: A literature review, Applied Energy, 130, 799-806 (2014)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.