×

Measuring dynamic efficiency: theories and an integrated methodology. (English) Zbl 1177.90206

Summary: Almost all dynamic production systems are subject to lagged productive effects, which are an often-ignored latent source of interference in the efficiency measuring process. Existing data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches rely on a static production environment. They can easily lead to biased evaluation results due to the erroneous assumption. To tackle this issue, this paper develops a dynamic DEA model that allows intertemporal effects in efficiency measuring. Specifically, the dynamic DEA model incorporates dynamic factors via a linear parametric formulation. Our model can be applied in place of static DEA models to a wide range of applications, such as analyzing longitudinal firm performance and productivity changes. As for the empirical efficiencies, we demonstrate how the lag parameters in the dynamic model can be estimated by the panel vector autoregressive model (PVAR). We use our methodology to evaluate advertising efficiencies of several major automobile and pharmaceutical firms in North America. The result shows that using static DEA in dynamic production can lead to both rank reversals and changes in efficiency scores.

MSC:

90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
37N40 Dynamical systems in optimization and economics
90C31 Sensitivity, stability, parametric optimization
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Abraham, M.; Lodish, L., Getting the most out of advertising and promotion, Harvard Business Review, 68, 50-60 (1990)
[2] Adams, J., Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth, Journal Political Economics, 98, 4, 673-702 (1990)
[3] Ahn, S.; Schmidt, P., Efficient estimation of dynamic panel data models: Alternative assumptions and simplified estimation, Journal of Econometrics, 76, 1-2, 309-321 (1997) · Zbl 0873.62124
[4] Banker, R.; Chang, H.; Natarajan, R., Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry, Management Science, 51, 2, 291-304 (2005)
[5] Bertsimas, D., Tsitsiklis, J., 1997. Introduction to Linear Optimization. Athena Scientific Belmont, Mass (Chapter 5).; Bertsimas, D., Tsitsiklis, J., 1997. Introduction to Linear Optimization. Athena Scientific Belmont, Mass (Chapter 5).
[6] Binder, M.; Hsiao, C.; Pesaran, M., Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit roots and cointegration, Econometric Theory, 21, 4, 795-837 (2005) · Zbl 1082.62072
[7] Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.; Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444 (1978) · Zbl 0416.90080
[8] Chen, C.-M., A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 3, 687-699 (2009) · Zbl 1162.90474
[9] Clarke, D., Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales, Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 345-357 (1976)
[10] Dekimpe, M.; Hanssens, D., The persistence of marketing effects on sales, Marketing Science, 14, 1, 1-21 (1995)
[11] Dekimpe, M.; Hanssens, D., Sustained spending and persistent response: a new look at long-term marketing profitability, Journal Marketing Research, 36, 4, 397-412 (1999)
[12] Devaraj, S.; Kohli, R., Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4, 41-67 (2000)
[13] Devaraj, S.; Kohli, R., Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link?, Management Science, 49, 3, 273-289 (2003)
[14] Emrouznejad, A.; Parker, B.; Tavares, G., Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA Journal of Socio-Economics Planning Science, Socio-Economic Planning Science, 42, 3, 151-157 (2008)
[15] Emrouznejad, A.; Thanassoulis, E., A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computations, 160, 363-378 (2005) · Zbl 1079.91053
[16] Evans, L.; Wells, G., An alternative approach to simulating VAR models, Economics Letters, 12, 1, 23-29 (1983)
[17] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Brännlund, R., Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA (1996), Kluwer Academic: Kluwer Academic Dordrecht
[18] Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Seldon, B.; Tremblay, V., Advertising efficiency and the choice of media mix: A case of beer, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 4, 503-522 (2004)
[19] Farrell, M., The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A (General), 120, 3, 253-290 (1957)
[20] Feinberg, F., continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response, Management Science, 47, 11, 1476-1487 (2001)
[21] Gal, T.; Greenberg, H., Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers · Zbl 0881.00025
[22] Gharajedaghi, J., Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture (2006), Butterworth-Heinemann
[23] Golany, B., A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 34, 1029-1033 (1988) · Zbl 0645.90043
[24] Greene, W., Econometric Analysis (2003), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall New Jersey
[25] Greuner, M.; Kamerschen, D.; Klein, P., The competitive effects of advertising in the US automobile industry, 1970-1994, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 7, 3, 245-261 (2000)
[26] Henderson, R.; Cockburn, I., Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery, RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 1, 32-59 (1996)
[27] Herrington, J.; Dempsey, W., Comparing the current effects and carryover of national-, regional-, and local-sponsor advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, 45, 01, 60-72 (2005)
[28] Huergo, E.; Jaumandreu, J., Firm’s age, process innovation and productivity growth, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 541-561 (2004)
[29] Huselid, M.; Becker, B., Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link, Industrial Relations, 35, 400-422 (1996)
[30] Ichniowski, C.; Shaw, K.; Prennushi, G., The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines, American Economic Review, 87, 3, 291-313 (1997)
[31] Landesmann, M.; Scazzieri, R., Production and Economic Dynamics (1996), Cambridge University Press · Zbl 1167.91301
[32] Luo, X.; Donthu, N., Assessing advertising media spending inefficiencies in generating sales, Journal of Business Research, 58, 1, 28-36 (2005)
[33] Luo, X.; Donthu, N., Marketing’s credibility: A longitudinal investigation of marketing communication productivity and shareholder value, Journal of Marketing, 70, 4, 70-91 (2006)
[34] Nemoto, J.; Goto, M., Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 2, 191-210 (2003)
[35] Neyman, J.; Scott, E., Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations, Econometrica, 16, 1, 1-32 (1948) · Zbl 0034.07602
[36] Romer, P., Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102 (1990)
[37] Rust, R.; Ambler, T.; Carpenter, G.; Kumar, V.; Srivastava, R., Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions, Journal of Marketing, 68, 4, 76-89 (2004)
[38] Scheel, H.; Scholtes, S., Continuity of DEA efficiency measures, Operations Research, 51, 149-159 (2003) · Zbl 1163.90652
[39] Sueyoshi, T., Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone in production and cost analyses, Management Science, 43, 6, 779-796 (1997) · Zbl 0890.90006
[40] Sueyoshi, T.; Sekitani, K., Returns to scale in dynamic DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 2, 536-544 (2005) · Zbl 1067.90089
[41] Thursby, J.; Thursby, M., Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Management Science, 48, 1, 90-104 (2002)
[42] Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.; Matson, P.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S., Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices, Nature, 418, 671-677 (2002)
[43] Tulkens, H.; Vanden Eeckaut, P., Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects, European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 3, 474-499 (1995) · Zbl 0928.91028
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.