×

Unification of parametric and implicit methods for shape sensitivity analysis and optimization with fixed mesh. (English) Zbl 07874359

Summary: Parametric and implicit methods are traditionally thought to be two irrelevant approaches in structural shape optimization. Parametric method works as a Lagrangian approach and often uses the parametric boundary representation (B-rep) of curves/surfaces, for example, Bezier and B-splines in combination with the conformal mesh of a finite element model, while implicit method relies upon level-set functions, that is, implicit functions for B-rep, and works as an Eulerian approach in combination with the fixed mesh within the scope of extended finite element method or finite cell method. The original contribution of this work is the unification of both methods. First, a new shape optimization method is proposed by combining the features of the parametric and implicit B-reps. Shape changes of the structural boundary are governed by parametric B-rep on the fixed mesh to maintain the merit in computer-aided design modeling and avoid laborious remeshing. Second, analytical shape design sensitivity is formulated for the parametric B-rep in the framework of fixed mesh of finite cell method by means of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Numerical examples are solved to illustrate the unified methodology.
{Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}

MSC:

74Sxx Numerical and other methods in solid mechanics
74Pxx Optimization problems in solid mechanics
74Kxx Thin bodies, structures

Software:

BOSS-Quattro
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] BraibantV, FleuryC. Shape optimal design using B‐splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering1984; 44(3):247-267. · Zbl 0525.73104
[2] BletzingerKU, FirlM, LinhardJ. Optimal shapes of mechanically motivated surfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2010; 199(5):324-333. · Zbl 1227.74043
[3] ZhangWH, WangD, YangJG. A parametric mapping method for curve shape optimization on 3D panel structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2010; 84:485-504. · Zbl 1202.74131
[4] LeC, BrunsT, TortorelliD. A gradient‐based, parameter‐free approach to shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2011; 200(9):985-996. · Zbl 1225.74065
[5] KimNH, ChoiKK, BotkinME. Numerical method for shape optimization using meshfree method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2002; 24(6):418-429.
[6] GarcíaMJ, StevenGP. Fixed grid finite elements in elasticity problems. Engineering Computations1999; 16(2):145-164. · Zbl 0948.74059
[7] GarcíaMJ, StevenGP. Fixed grid finite element analysis in structural design and optimization. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, University of Sydney, 1999.
[8] DunningPD, KimHA, MullineuxG. Investigation and improvement of sensitivity computation using the area‐fraction weighted fixed grid FEM and structural optimization. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design2011; 47(8):933-941.
[9] KimNH, ChangY. Eulerian shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization with a fixed grid. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2005; 194(30):3291-3314. · Zbl 1137.74415
[10] WangD, ZhangWH. A general material perturbation method using fixed mesh for stress sensitivity analysis and structural shape optimization. Computers & Structures2013; 129:40-53.
[11] SukumarN, MoësN, MoranB. Extended finite element method for three‐dimensional crack modelling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2000; 48(11):1549-1570. · Zbl 0963.74067
[12] Van MiegroetL, DuysinxP. Stress concentration minimization of 2D filets using X‐FEM and level set description. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization2007; 33(4-5):425-438.
[13] LuoZ, ZhangN, GaoW. Structural shape and topology optimization using a meshless Galerkin level set method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2012; 90(3):369-389. · Zbl 1242.74076
[14] ParvizianJ, DüsterA, RankE. Finite cell method. Computational Mechanics2007; 41(1):121-133. · Zbl 1162.74506
[15] ParvizianJ, DüsterA, RankE. Topology optimization using the finite cell method. Optimization and Engineering2012; 13(1):57-78. · Zbl 1293.74357
[16] CaiSY, ZhangWH, ZhuJH. Stress constrained shape and topology optimization with fixed mesh: a B‐spline finite cell method combined with level set function. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2014; 278:361-387. · Zbl 1423.74741
[17] WangMY, WangX, GuoD. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2003; 192(1):227-246. · Zbl 1083.74573
[18] AllaireG, JouveF, ToaderAM. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level‐set method. Journal of Computational Physics2004; 194(1):363-393. · Zbl 1136.74368
[19] SethianJA, WiegmannA. Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. Journal of Computational Physics2000; 163(2):489-528. · Zbl 0994.74082
[20] LuoZ, WangMY, WangSY, WeiP. A level set‐based parameterization method for structural shape and topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering2008; 76(1):1-26. · Zbl 1158.74443
[21] WangY, LuoZ, KangZ. A multi‐material level set‐based topology and shape optimization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2015; 283:1570-1586. · Zbl 1423.74769
[22] FougerolleYD, GribokA, FoufouS. Boolean operations with implicit and parametric representation of primitives using R‐functions. Visualization and Computer Graphics2005; 11(5):529-539.
[23] ShapiroV. Theory of R‐Functions and Applications: A Primer. In CPA88‐3, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1988.
[24] ManberU. Introduction to Algorithms: A Creative Approach. Addison‐Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.: Boston, Massachusetts, 1989. · Zbl 0825.68397
[25] FeitoF, TorresJC, UrenaA. Orientation, simplicity, and inclusion test for planar polygons. Computers & Graphics1995; 19(4):595-600.
[26] HormannK, AgathosA. The point in polygon problem for arbitrary polygons. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications2001; 20(3):131-144. · Zbl 0990.68173
[27] TaylorG. Point in polygon test. Survey Review1994; 32(254):479-484.
[28] HuangCW, ShihTY. On the complexity of point‐in‐polygon algorithms. Computers & Geosciences1997; 23(1):109-118.
[29] TeillaudM. Union and split operations on dynamic trapezoidal maps. Computational Geometry2000; 17(3):153-163. · Zbl 0968.68038
[30] PreparataFP, ShamosMI. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer: New York, 1985. · Zbl 0575.68059
[31] EtzionM, RappoportA. On compatible star decompositions of simple polygons. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics1997; 3(1):87-95.
[32] RankE. Shell Finite Cell Method: a high order fictitious domain approach for thin‐walled structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2011; 200:3200-3209. · Zbl 1230.74232
[33] SederbergTW, AndersonDC, GoldmanRN. Implicit representation of parametric curves and surfaces. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing1984; 28(1):72-84. · Zbl 0601.65008
[34] WalkerRJ. Algebraic Curves. Princeton: New Jersey, 1950.
[35] YalcinH, UnelM, WolovichW. Implicitization of parametric curves by matrix annihilation. International Journal of Computer Vision2003; 54(1-3):105-115. · Zbl 1076.68098
[36] SvanbergK. A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch. In First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization: Goslar, Germany, 1995; 9-16.
[37] RadovcicY, RemouchampsA. BOSS QUATTRO: an open system for parametric design. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization2002; 23(2):140-152.
[38] BennettJA, BotkinME. Structural shape optimization with geometric description and adaptive mesh refinement. AIAA Journal1985; 23(3):458-464.
[39] HölligK, ReifU, WipperJ. Weighted extended B‐spline approximation of Dirichlet problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis2001; 39(2):442-462. · Zbl 0996.65119
[40] HölligK, ApprichC, StreitA. Introduction to the Web‐method and its applications. Advances in Computational Mathematics2005; 23(1-2):215-237. · Zbl 1070.65118
[41] ZhangWH, BeckersP, FleuryC. A unified parametric design approach to structural shape optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering1995; 38(13):2283-2292. · Zbl 0854.73040
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.