×

Simultaneous linear and anti-windup controller synthesis: delayed activation case. (English) Zbl 1332.93126

Summary: In this paper, we present a method for the synthesis of a delayed anti-windup scheme in which the anti-windup compensator is activated only when the degree of saturation reaches a certain level. Unlike the traditional two-step anti-windup design procedure, our method synthesizes entire parameters of the nominal controller and the delayed anti-windup compensator simultaneously. In this simultaneous design, the trade-offs between the linear and the constrained closed-loop response are carried out, for the anti-windup compensator retrofits to the “existing” nominal controller. Sufficient conditions for guaranteeing global stability and minimizing the induced \(\mathcal{L}_2\) gain performance for exogenous input are formulated and solved as some linear matrix inequality (LMI) optimization problems. Effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated with a well-known example.

MSC:

93B50 Synthesis problems
93C15 Control/observation systems governed by ordinary differential equations
93C10 Nonlinear systems in control theory
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] YoonS. S., J. K.Park, and T. W.Yoon, “Dynamic anti‐windup scheme for feedback linearizable nonlinear control systems with saturating inputs,” Automatica, Vol. 44, No. 12, pp. 3176-3180 (2008). · Zbl 1153.93498
[2] TarbouriechS. and M.Turner, “Anti‐windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems,” IET Contr. Theory Appl., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-19 (2009).
[3] GaleaniS., S.Tarbouriech, M.Turner, and L.Zaccarian, “A tutorial on modern anti‐windup design,” Eur. J. Control, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 418-440 (2009). · Zbl 1298.93164
[4] TarbouriechS., G.Garcia, Gomes da SilvaJr, J. M. and I.Queinnec, Stability and Stabilization of Linear Systems with Saturating Actuators, Springer, London (2011). · Zbl 1279.93004
[5] ZaccarianL. and A. R.Teel, Modern Anti‐Windup Synthesis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2011).
[6] HanusR., M.Kinnaert, and J. L.Henrotte, “Conditioning technique, a general anti‐windup and bumpless transfer method,” Automatica, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 729-739 (1987). · Zbl 0638.93036
[7] KothareM. V., P. J.Campo, and M.Morari, “A unified framework for the study of anti‐windup designs,” Automatica, Vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 1869-1883 (1994). · Zbl 0825.93312
[8] MulderE. F., M. V.Kothare, and M.Morari, “Multivariable anti‐windup controller synthesis using linear matrix inequalities,” Automatica, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1401-1416 (2001). · Zbl 0996.93035
[9] WuX., and Z.Lin, “On immediate, delayed and anticipatory activation of anti‐windup mechanism: static anti‐windup case,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 771-777 (2012). · Zbl 1369.93401
[10] CaoY. Y., Z.Lin, and D. G.Ward, “Anti‐windup approach to enlarging domain of attractions for linear systems subject to actuator saturation and constant disturbances,” Automatica, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 140-145 (2012). · Zbl 1364.93612
[11] De DonaJ. A., S. O.Reza Moheimani, and G. C.Goodwin, “Robust combined plc/lhg controller with over saturation in input signal,” Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Chicago, IL, pp. 750-751 (2000).
[12] Gomes da SilvaJ. M. and S.Tarbouriech, “Anti‐windup design with guaranteed regions of stability: an LMI based approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 106-111 (2005). · Zbl 1365.93443
[13] HuT., and Z.Lin, “Exact characterization of invariant ellipsoids for single input linear systems subject to actuator saturation,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 164-169 (2002). · Zbl 1364.93160
[14] GrimmG., A. R.Teel, and L.Zaccarian, “Linear LMI‐based external anti‐windup augmentation for stable linear systems,” Automatica, Vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1987-1996 (2004). · Zbl 1059.93048
[15] RoosC., and BiannicJ. M., “A convex characterization of dynamically‐constrained anti‐windup controllers,” Automatica, Vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 2449-2452 (2008). · Zbl 1153.93376
[16] Sajjadi‐KiaS. and F.Jabbari, “Modified anti‐windup compensators for stable plants,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 54, No. 8, pp. 1934-1939 (2009). · Zbl 1367.93211
[17] Sajjadi‐KiaS. and F.Jabbari, “Modified dynamic anti‐windup through deferral of activation,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, Vol. 22, pp. 1661-1673 (2012). · Zbl 1274.93093
[18] DoA. L., Comes da SilvaJr, J. M., O.Sename, and L.Dugard. “Control design for LPV systems with input saturation and state constraints: an application to a semi‐active suspension,” Proc. 50th Conf. Decis. Control, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 3416-3421 (2011).
[19] Gomes da SilvaJ. M., D.Limon, T.Alamo, and E. F.Camacho, “Dynamic output feedback for discrete‐time systems under amplitude and rate actuator constraints,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 2367-2372 (2008). · Zbl 1367.93503
[20] MulderE. F., P. Y.Tiwari, and M. V.Kothare, “Simultaneous linear and anti‐windup controller synthesis using multiobjective convex optimization,” Automatica, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 805-811 (2008). · Zbl 1168.93344
[21] SchererC., P.Gahinet, and M.Chilali, “Multiobjective output‐feedback control via LMI optimization,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 896-911 (1997). · Zbl 0883.93024
[22] GrimmG., J.Hatifield, I.Postlethwaite, A. R.Teel, M.Turner, and L.Zaccarian, “Anti‐windup for stable linear systems with input saturation: an LMI based synthesis,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 1509-1525 (2003). · Zbl 1364.93635
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.