×

Mechanobiological free energy: a variational approach to tensional homeostasis in tissue equivalents. (English) Zbl 07775396

Summary: Classical engineering materials typically seek to maintain or attain a relaxed, stress-free state, if admitted by the boundary conditions. By contrast, living tissues seek to establish and maintain a certain non-zero target stress, a behavior that is often referred to as tensional homeostasis. Although a growing body of experimental evidence is underpinning the importance of tensional homeostasis for the biomechanics of living tissues, its theoretical implications remain poorly understood. Motivated by tissue culture studies, this paper demonstrates that tensional homeostasis has significant impact on the way how the notion of free energy should be conceptualized in living tissues. It demonstrates that standard variational approaches from continuum mechanics and engineering mechanics such as the principle of minimal total mechanical potential are in practice often insufficient to capture even the qualitative mechanical behavior of living tissues. To overcome this problem, this paper introduces, under assumptions that reflect the situation in tissue culture experiments, the novel concept of mechanobiological free energy. Mechanobiological free energy is shown to share the essential favorable properties of other free energy concepts such as Helmholtz free energy or strain energy but to generalize them in a way suitable to understand mechanobiological remodeling in collagenous tissues inhabited by living cells. In particular, mechanobiological free energy gives rise to a simple variational approach to tensional homeostasis in tissue equivalents.
{© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim}

MSC:

74Lxx Special subfields of solid mechanics
74Axx Generalities, axiomatics, foundations of continuum mechanics of solids
92Cxx Physiological, cellular and medical topics
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] R. A.Brown et al., Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three‐dimensional substrates, J. Cell Physiol. 175(3), 323-332 (1998).
[2] H.Wolinsky and S.Glagov, A lamellar unit of aortic medial structure and function in mammals, Circ. Res.20(1), 99-111 (1967).
[3] T.Matsumoto and K.Hayashi, Response of arterial wall to hypertension and residual stress, in: K.Hayashi (ed.), A.Kamiya (ed.), and K.Ono (ed.) (Editors), Biomechanics (Springer, 1996), p. 93-119.
[4] D. G.Ezra et al., Changes in fibroblast mechanostat set point and mechanosensitivity: an adaptive response to mechanical stress in floppy eyelid syndrome, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.51(8), 3853-3863 (2010).
[5] D. D.Simon and J. D.Humphrey, Learning from Tissue Equivalents: Biomechanics and Mechanobiology, in: A. B.Brennan (ed.) and C. M.Kirschner (ed.) (Editors), Bio‐inspired Materials for Biomedical Engineering (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014), p. 281-308.
[6] D. D.Simon, S. I.Murtada, and J. D.Humphrey, Computational model of matrix remodeling and entrenchment in the free‐floating fibroblast‐populated collagen lattice, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.30(12), 1506-1529 (2014).
[7] D. D.Simon, L. E.Niklason, and J. D.Humphrey, Tissue Transglutaminase, not lysyl Oxidase, dominates early Calcium‐dependent remodeling of fibroblast‐populated collagen lattices, Cells Tissues Organs200(2), 104-117 (2014).
[8] C. J.Cyron and J. D.Humphrey, Growth and remodeling of load‐bearing biological soft tissues, Meccanica, p. 1-20 (2016).
[9] C. J.Cyron and J. D.Humphrey, Vascular homeostasis and the concept of mechanobiological stability, Int. J. Eng. Sci.85, 203-223 (2014).
[10] G.Holzapfel, Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2000). · Zbl 0980.74001
[11] J.Ferruzzi, M. R.Bersi, and J. D.Humphrey, Biomechanical phenotyping of central arteries in health and disease: advantages of and methods for murine models, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41(7), 1311-1330 (2013).
[12] J. P.Vande Geest, M. S.Sacks, and D. A.Vorp, The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta, J. Biomech. 39(7), 1324-1334 (2006).
[13] G.Holzapfel, T.Gasser, and R.Ogden, A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models, J. Elast.61(1‐3), 1-48 (2000). · Zbl 1023.74033
[14] E.Kuhl and P.Steinmann, On spatial and material settings of thermo‐hyperelastodynamics for open systems, Acta Mech.160(3), 179-217 (2003). · Zbl 1064.74007
[15] E.Kuhl and P.Steinmann, Mass– and volume-specific views on thermodynamics for open systems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Phys. Eng. Sci.459(2038), 2547-2568 (2003). · Zbl 1092.80500
[16] G. A.Ateshian and T.Ricken, Multigenerational interstitial growth of biological tissues, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 9(6), 689-702 (2010).
[17] K. E. K.Wyatt, J. W.Bourne, and P. A.Torzilli, Deformation‐dependent enzyme mechanokinetic cleavage of type I collagen, J. Biomech. Eng. 131(5), 051004 (2009).
[18] B. P.Flynn et al., Mechanical strain stabilizes reconstituted collagen fibrils against enzymatic degradation by mammalian collagenase matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP‐8), PLoS One, 5(8), e12337 (2010).
[19] C. J.O’Callaghan and B.Williams, Mechanical strain‐induced extracellular matrix production by human vascular smooth muscle cells: role of TGF‐beta(1), Hypertension36(3), 319-324 (2000).
[20] J. S.Wilson, S.Baek, and J. D.Humphrey, Parametric study of effects of collagen turnover on the natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Proc. R. Soc. A469(2150), 20120556 (2013). · Zbl 1371.92069
[21] C. A.Figueroa et al., A computational framework for fluid‐solid‐growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.198(45‐46), 3583-3602 (2009). · Zbl 1229.74097
[22] T. S. E.Eriksson et al., Modelling volumetric growth in a thick walled fibre reinforced artery, J. Mech. Phys. Solids73, 134-150 (2014). · Zbl 1349.74260
[23] A.Valentín, J.Humphrey, and G. A.Holzapfel, A finite element‐based constrained mixture implementation for arterial growth, remodeling, and adaptation: Theory and numerical verification, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng.29(8), 822-849 (2013).
[24] C. J.Cyron, R. C.Aydin, and J. D.Humphrey, A homogenized constrained mixture (and mechanical analog) model for growth and remodeling of soft tissue, Biomech. Model. Mechan. (2016).
[25] J. D.Humphrey and S. L.O’Rourke, An Introduction to Biomechanics: Solids and Fluids, Analysis and Design (Springer, New York, 2015).
[26] C. J.Cyron, J. S.Wilson, and J. D.Humphrey, Mechanobiological stability: a new paradigm to understand the enlargement of aneurysms?J. R. Soc. Int.11(100), 20140680 (2014).
[27] P.Junker, J.Makowski, and K.Hackl, The principle of the minimum of the dissipation potential for non‐isothermal processes, Contin. Mech. Thermodyn.26(3), 259-268 (2014). · Zbl 1341.80008
[28] P.Junker and K.Hackl, A discontinuous phase field approach to variational growth‐based topology optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., p. 1-14 (2016).
[29] P.Junker and K.Hackl, A variational growth approach to topology optimization, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.52(2), 293-304 (2015).
[30] D. R.Jantos, P.Junker, and K.Hackl, An evolutionary topology optimization approach with variationally controlled growth, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.310, 780-801 (2016). · Zbl 1439.74278
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.